I am disassociating myself from this section of I2.

[odeon]

I'm pretty much the same, but there are posters I tend to ignore, too.

[Lucifer]

 

[Sophgay]

 I tend to choose whether or not to ignore based on the subject, rather than the poster. But I do read some people's posts more than others.

[Calandale]

But really, if someone wants to ignore someone because they annoy them or make their blood boil or whatever, why do you have to turn that around and make it a negative thing about that person by refering to it as "wanting to stick their head in the sand"?

Well, in the case of site related issues, it means not ever being able to understand
the full context of issues. In other cases, it might well mean hiding from attacks on
themselves, and not realizing how idiotic they are coming off.

Seems to be that you want to be able to harp on and on about something to someone without them being able to not hear you. You want to be able to trap them into your dialogue. Or you want them to be answerable to made up accusations from your detective work or that of like minded people. It's no secret that you value chaos, but that doesnt mean you get to ram it down the throats of others. I'm sure that there are a few people that treat this place and perhaps a few others as their only social outlet. If you want a handful of arseholes to be able to ruin that for someone because you think they should be made to listen to something that could be really stressing them out, good for you. How does that make you feel? Not too bad I suppose.

As I've noted, one already need not read posts.
But, at least you can go back and see, if there is
something interesting which is referred to, if they're
not turned off - you aren't limited to half the story.
Personally, I would hate to be being attacked, WITHOUT
being able to respond; incidentally why I told Steve K that
he was coming under fire here, and should stop by to defend
himself. Bad TOM, in that case - he flipped out about being
told.

You are equating having a voice which everyone CAN read,
to forcing people to read them.

Funny how that things that annoy you are more important that things that annoy others that you dont happen to agree or care about.

Nothing funny about it. Pretty much human nature, I think.
Now, the question of whether free speech is annoying are
not is an issue worth addressing. Hiding, and sniping it away
piece by piece, without even realizing that is what is being done
is something else entirely. Be aware of what you are destroying.

[Pyraxis]

I'm pretty much the same, but there are posters I tend to ignore, too.

  If you're ignoring people, then you're not reading the responses of every member. How is that being the same?

[Persona]

I read most posts.

Just don't reply to all of them.

[Calandale]

I read and reply to my own posts only.
No one else makes sense.

[duncvis]

I read and reply to my own posts only.
No one else makes sense.

that's because you're fucking delusional.

[Pyraxis]

I read and reply to my own posts only.
No one else makes sense.

Because there are no separations between your body and any other matter in existence, huh?

[Calandale]

I read and reply to my own posts only.
No one else makes sense.

Because there are no separations between your body and any other matter in existence, huh?

Sure. 

I was just cracking a joke though.
The reality is that a tend to skim most stuff
(not games much). I post in most places that
I read.

[Pyraxis]

Because there are no separations between your body and any other matter in existence, huh?

Sure. 

I was just cracking a joke though.

So was I. 

[Calandale]

Because there are no separations between your body and any other matter in existence, huh?

Sure. 

I was just cracking a joke though.

So was I. 

Ah, but I hadn't even thought of that. Because,
it IS true. Not sure that my thoughts are matter though.

[odeon]

I'm pretty much the same, but there are posters I tend to ignore, too.

  If you're ignoring people, then you're not reading the responses of every member. How is that being the same?

*Pretty much* the same--when I read a thread, I usually read everyone's responses. The few that I don't always read are Flo (because he does my head in when he goes off on ginseng and stuff), Cal (when he goes on yet another variation of that same old tired theme), and maybe one or two others.

So "pretty much" should be interpreted as "almost", in this case. Pardon the foreigner, if the phrase doesn't fit.

[Calandale]

The few that I don't always read are Flo (because he does my head in when he goes off on ginseng and stuff), Cal (when he goes on yet another variation of that same old tired theme), and maybe one or two others.

Interesting that you nearly always RESPOND,
given that you don't read.

Glad that you admit it though, pathetic as it is.

[odeon]

The few that I don't always read are Flo (because he does my head in when he goes off on ginseng and stuff), Cal (when he goes on yet another variation of that same old tired theme), and maybe one or two others.

Interesting that you nearly always RESPOND,
given that you don't read.

Glad that you admit it though, pathetic as it is.

I tend to respond to the ones where you reply to me. Disagree? Go back and look, and prove me wrong. Lazy fuck.