Hold on, you think condemning gays and death camps is going to solve the problem?
First of all, I'm not condemning homosexuals but rather disagreeing with their lifestyle being regarded as a normal and healthy alternative to heterosexuality. One of my best friends is a very hedonistic lesbian, by the way.
Second, I'm not condeming death camps (I do oppose the concept, but that's another issue) but merely saying that the German camps during WW2 were work camps rather than death camps, including Auschwitz, Majdanek, Belzec or Chelmo.
Further, I'm not saying that awareness solves the problem. It's just the preperation towards solving the problem. Without seeing things from their proper perspective, you can't make the proper analysis and come up with the proper conclusions. You must understand both the past and the present to know how to move forwards.
If you're worried about supremacist religions, you might want to check Christianity and Islam. In case you hadn't noticed, it's not WW2 anymore. Which religions people are killing people over have changed.
Actually, zionism is pretty much a secular equivalent to judaism and one of the greatest threats in the modern world. I object far more to zionism than to Christianity and Islam, but I agree to them being dangerous frames of thought as well. In fact, most frames of thought derived from Judaism tend to be dangerous in many ways.
What's the causal relationship between Judaism and the today's-society/Roman-Empire similarities?
Read the literature of Kevin MacDonald (eg. The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements) or Israel Shahak (eg. Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years). Both authors are college professors, their works are scientific and solid and available on Amazon. I will not attempt to summarize the thousands of pages they wrote in a handful of paragraphs as that's simply impossible.
BTW, how can you believe in a meritocracy and be against capitalism?
Capitalism is a society where power is based on economical dominance. A meritocracy is a society where power is based on individual merit. Both contradict, since rich people often are not those with most individual merit.
As for all the back to nature stuff, are you unaware of the homosexual behavior of most animal species, including chimps?
I am familiar with homosexuality among aminals. They are a tiny minority among most species. Bonobo chimps are a peculiar species and would rather qualify as bisexual rather than homosexual. A peculiar fact about bonobos is also that their groups are led by females rather than males, which could explain their deviance in comparison with other species. Female-run societies tend to be differently organised from male-run societies due to the difference between males and females.
If you believe in taking all values from nature, perhaps you should begin eating your mates.
This only occurs among a few species. It is hardly general practice among animals.
Or killing other species without respect. Humans aren't the only ones who wipe out species, by a long shot.
Most animals only kill another animal for food. They don't kill if they don't have to. As a consequence, a pet dog or a cat can become very good friends with a rabbit if he's fed properally.
The process of evolution was operating long before we showed up on the planet. We're a flash in the pan. What makes you think our values and motivations are somehow separate from the process of evolution?
Man is the only species capable of ignoring his instincts and rationally choosing to do the oposite. This allows him to go against nature and arroganty follow his own path which is exactly what post-modern man is doing. Post-modern society is in many ways exactly oposite to the ways or nature.
You're certainly full of theories, but most idiots have an opinion. "Great ideological leader" is going off the deep end.
Believe me or not, but this is how people have described me in the past. I surely encountered a lot of people who hate me for what I stand for, but I also have my groupies and sympathisers.
