Photo Thread.

[TheoK]

So you had no arguments. You know very well that there were fewer crimes with guns in the 1920s. You just happen to like Big brother controlling people, because you're a leftist deep inside.

Why should I argue with a nazi nutcase with delusions of adequacy?

So you just had ad hominem again as an argument.

I'll tell you why you hate guns. You have a fundamental feeling of being inferior. Power scares you, if it's about much more than being the king of I². Becasue you're afraid of a real power position you can't stand anyone else having one either.

Hypocrite.

Why so? That wasn't ad hominem, that was an analysis of the passive-aggressive mind.

You use ad homs all the time.

Because he's dishonest and self-righteous. He doesn't answer my questions, becuase he knows, for example, that my point with free guns and a low crime rate back in the 1920's in Sweden is correct.

A murder in Sweden back then caused headlines from that the crime was committed until the murderer was convicted. Today murders are committed every week and more murders are also committed with guns than 80 years ago. He knows that, so he has to avoid answering my questions and calling me a Nazi and lunatic and stuff.

Same thing when you try to discuss Kaczynski with him. He refuses to discuss the manifesto but just repeats that Kaczynski is a murderer and is "where he belongs". He behaves like the vested powers want the sheeple to behave.

Yes, dear.  

Still no answer.

[odeon]

So you had no arguments. You know very well that there were fewer crimes with guns in the 1920s. You just happen to like Big brother controlling people, because you're a leftist deep inside.

Why should I argue with a nazi nutcase with delusions of adequacy?

So you just had ad hominem again as an argument.

I'll tell you why you hate guns. You have a fundamental feeling of being inferior. Power scares you, if it's about much more than being the king of I². Becasue you're afraid of a real power position you can't stand anyone else having one either.

OMG, the nazi fuckwit attempts to analyse me.  

It's all very interesting, Lit, except that you're wrong in just about everything, from your basic your assumption and forwards. I've never said I hate guns. I don't feel inferior--quite the contrary when observing fuckwits like you. It's hard not to feel superior to you in every imaginable way, actually, because you're so incredibly dull and witless.

But keep on trying. It provides comic relief when I grow tired of watching paint dry.

You are inferior. You couldn't even handle Kamina in an honest way.

Yes dear. /pats Lit on the head

[odeon]

So you had no arguments. You know very well that there were fewer crimes with guns in the 1920s. You just happen to like Big brother controlling people, because you're a leftist deep inside.

Why should I argue with a nazi nutcase with delusions of adequacy?

So you just had ad hominem again as an argument.

I'll tell you why you hate guns. You have a fundamental feeling of being inferior. Power scares you, if it's about much more than being the king of I². Becasue you're afraid of a real power position you can't stand anyone else having one either.

Hypocrite.

Why so? That wasn't ad hominem, that was an analysis of the passive-aggressive mind.

You use ad homs all the time.

Because he's dishonest and self-righteous. He doesn't answer my questions, becuase he knows, for example, that my point with free guns and a low crime rate back in the 1920's in Sweden is correct.

A murder in Sweden back then caused headlines from that the crime was committed until the murderer was convicted. Today murders are committed every week and more murders are also committed with guns than 80 years ago. He knows that, so he has to avoid answering my questions and calling me a Nazi and lunatic and stuff.

Same thing when you try to discuss Kaczynski with him. He refuses to discuss the manifesto but just repeats that Kaczynski is a murderer and is "where he belongs". He behaves like the vested powers want the sheeple to behave.

Yes, dear.  

Still no answer.

Yes, dear. 

[TheoK]

Still no answer.

[odeon]

Yes dear.

[TheoK]

Still no answer.

[Frolic_Fun]

Huh?

[TheoK]

Lit: "Was there a higher crime rate with guns in Sweden before 1927, when we had no gun law or is it higher now, and, if so, what does that say about the gun law?"

odeon: "Yes, dear."

[The_Chosen_One]

If people had better access to guns, they'd shoot your nazi ass for being a twat.

No, they wouldn't. They don't have the guts to do it even with guns.

It must be true, because you say so. 

No, but America is full of guns, though murders on neo-Nazis are rare there.

Probably true but then again, I would bet that Neo-Nazis are responsible for quite a few murders.

[Parts]

Still no answer.

Still no photo

[P7PSP]

Now that I have a camera I'll post here after I get some practice with it. I should have got one a few months back.

[Lucifer]

yay, to parts and johnny for posting photos!

[Lucifer]

is it snowing where you live, johnny?

[Johnny]

14 inches so far, should have 2 feet by morning

[Johnny]