As for pointing out attacks when you spot them, no, that is not sufficient.
It is, for my purposes.
I don't need your approval.
Much as you want me to.
Another one of my points was that you can only see things flowing in one direction, and a very narrow view it is. Just how narrow was already pointed out by Callaway re her private life. But when you go after her, you don't even stop to think about how what you do is precisely the thing you accuse her of.
Nah. I was already aware of her proclivity then,
and put that in my dossier.
Seriously, sure,
we have biases. But, I've not fought at all, in the
manner that she does.
But you just don't, or won't, see it. It is you who cannot learn.
Since it seems so important to you,
do your homework, and show me where I
have done to her any of what I'm accusing
her of. I suspect it's merely a matter of differing
morality. Likely there are things which I just don't
see, behind her actions, but I certainly feel that I
have a decent grip on them - and she's not stood
forth to correct my impressions. Whenever someone
accuses me of acting falsely, I DO defend.
If she sees no need to appear as honorable as she
thinks she is, that is something that I truly don't
understand - thus, there are likely misjudgments.
But, from my standpoint, whenever she has a defense,
she seems to use it. So, I suspect that some of my
accusations are actually taking root, where they count,
in her. She's not one to back down from a fight.
