Post a useless fact

[odeon]

You are kidding, right?

No. The 2nd Amendment actually says so, and George Washington himself said that a people should always have guns and ammunition enough to fight its own government if they had to.

Then you're a fucking laugh riot, someone who cannot be taken seriously. Have you any idea of how pathetic you sound when you whine about the government not making it easy for you to obtain explosives?

Why? The US constitution says you have a right to have the means to fight an unjust government, and the first US president said those words literally. So why should I be laughed at?

Because you're so incredibly naive, still. You figure it out. You claim to be intelligent.

[RageBeoulve]

You are kidding, right?

No. The 2nd Amendment actually says so, and George Washington himself said that a people should always have guns and ammunition enough to fight its own government if they had to.

Then you're a fucking laugh riot, someone who cannot be taken seriously. Have you any idea of how pathetic you sound when you whine about the government not making it easy for you to obtain explosives?

I have to agree man. If your problem with them is their disregard of the rules, why don't you say fuck the rules too and do something about it?

Do you realize how hard it is to obtain 1 ton of ammonium nitrate without a permission?

Well put that weapon in your hand and take it by force, soldier! I mean damn. If you're going to be a hero, then be a fucking hero.

[odeon]

He'd probably stop at the red light before driving his truckful of explosives into the parliament.

Yes, like when I blew up that sign. That was very obedient of me.   But that a small amount I have no problem to make. But it won't do for the parliament.

That showed them!

[Blasted]

Lit is better than comedy 

[TheoK]

He'd probably stop at the red light before driving his truckful of explosives into the parliament.

Yes, like when I blew up that sign. That was very obedient of me.   But that a small amount I have no problem to make. But it won't do for the parliament.

That showed them!

If every person they gave a cowardly speed ticket did that, it would show them, yes. Several thousands of traffic signs blown away would cost money and might even cause chaos.

[odeon]

:LMAO

[TheoK]

:LMAO

So it isn't true? You, for instance, would never dare to blow up anything.

[odeon]

[RageBeoulve]

He'd probably stop at the red light before driving his truckful of explosives into the parliament.

Yes, like when I blew up that sign. That was very obedient of me.   But that a small amount I have no problem to make. But it won't do for the parliament.

That showed them!

If every person they gave a cowardly speed ticket did that, it would show them, yes. Several thousands of traffic signs blown away would cost money and might even cause chaos.

But you won't cause several thousand to do it. You're doing it wrong man. The way you do things, it would be in the news the next day as some wierdo blowing something up. Everyone would say aww thats too bad and nothing would come out of it.

You have to put a bit of thought into revolution man.  

[TheoK]

So you have blown something up? When? What?

[Blasted]

We can always be BRAVE and blow Lit up 

[odeon]

We can always be BRAVE and blow Lit up 

 

[TheoK]

You'd never dare to. 

[TheoK]

He'd probably stop at the red light before driving his truckful of explosives into the parliament.

Yes, like when I blew up that sign. That was very obedient of me.   But that a small amount I have no problem to make. But it won't do for the parliament.

That showed them!

If every person they gave a cowardly speed ticket did that, it would show them, yes. Several thousands of traffic signs blown away would cost money and might even cause chaos.

But you won't cause several thousand to do it. You're doing it wrong man. The way you do things, it would be in the news the next day as some wierdo blowing something up. Everyone would say aww thats too bad and nothing would come out of it.

You have to put a bit of thought into revolution man.  

No, you don't understand. Society works, just because most people are so obedient. If everyone stopped obeying the law like one man, the state would collaps within hours.

[Trigger 11]

People who choose not to vote have no right to complain.

Not correct at all, the 1st Amendment puts no such limitations on peoples right to seek redress of grievances, freedom of speech or anything else covered by the 1st Amendment. In cases where people only see a choice of Tweedle Dee or Tweedle Dum why should they vote for either if they don't want to?

As soon as I posted that I knew I should have revised it, but figured I would let someone reply before further discussing. What I really mean is not participating in the process at all. Sure, legally they still have a right to complain, but they lose some credibility when they are apathetic to the process then come in at the end.