Either he/shes as conceited and bitter as the individuals he/she associates with or its just a simple case of that person basically listened to what he/she was told about the people here by biased individuals (involved in a situation previously where some true colours were shown and/or a situation where honest replies were given but not appreciated which pissed them off) and he/she made an instant judgment about us based on what she was told by those bitter sods or should i say what they chose to tell him/her.
A sensible person would have listened to what he/she was told by her biased "buddies" and absorbed it, but would have kept it to one side whilst he/she tried to get to know these people for herself before making her mind up or atleast got honest or accurate information from more neutral individuals first.
Its all very pathetic but well what do you expect when you see who that persons supposed associates are, RobertN (bitter, naive), Omega (manipulative, two-faced, user) and Ascan ( i will reserve full judgement on him though as i havent encountered him personally ive only heard uncomplementary bits and peices from other sources who may or may not be biased), but yeah seems to say it all really.
Should be fun though and give us some amusement from time to time when we are bored.
Question for QC, i asked Eamonn the same question, dont know if youve been asked it before so apologies if you have.
If you could live anywhere else in the world, where would it be and why?
