Not politically correct. Considering one set of believers in the word of 2000+ yr old sheepshaggers trying to claim that another set of believers in the word of 2000+ yr old sheepshaggers are evil/wrong/primitive/pwned is fucking hilarious.
Both groups obviously have problems. One of these groups succeeded in created a society that condones suicide bombings, honor killings, and the slave-like oppression of women. Do I think that makes the other group morally better as a whole? Forgive me for saying so, but yes.
you've obviously never read the history of the christian church then, either. and have never heard of various christian groups who, even today, think it's okay to sexually harrass/abuse young girls, cos they've got red hair, or are pretty, and who then go on to bewail the fact that the devil got into a 7 seven old, and made her tempt them. what complete bollocks.
Not politically correct. Considering one set of believers in the word of 2000+ yr old sheepshaggers trying to claim that another set of believers in the word of 2000+ yr old sheepshaggers are evil/wrong/primitive/pwned is fucking hilarious. The bigotry is what makes you a wanker. I don't get you guys - Xtians, Muslims and Jews all base their delusion of superiority (along with Mor(m)ons, Jehovahs Witnesses/insert crackpot sect here) on the same set of fucking divinely inspired *cough* writings from the Bronze Age. So you'll excuse me if I view your attempts to scream the moral high groundf at each other across a field of bodies as a bit fucking rich. Try making a cogent point or two instead of applauding others' bollocks and I'll be happy to debate them with you.
QFT.
reminds me of the SWP - haven't got an opinion of ther own unless it's in a pamphlet somewhere.
You mean like your insightfully cogent argument (which brims with security)? I think I'll pass.
bit defensive, eh? i think dunc's point stands - he did say "cogent" and not "cop out".