huh? evidence of communication between Scrap and ALM is so indisputable that Scrap didn't even try to dispute it when confronted, just made an excuse. How much more plausible can this get?
And that was weeks ago. Well, Ive hunted down the relevant post(s) and linked to them before. I guess its up to somebody else to do that, this time.
Ozy evidently has me on ignore. *sigh *
Yes, I PM'ed ALM. So what? what does that prove?
The short answer is that it proves absolutely nothing. But assuming that answer won't suffice, I'll expand a bit:
I was just trying to draw a clear line line between fact and theory.
Undisputed fact: Scrap and ALM were in contact by PM ( evidently more than once).
Further, possibly related, fact: Scrap was lurking on I^2 without posting throughout the the ALM sequence of posts, and with such regularity that Scrap and ALM appeared to be joined at the hip . But now we're starting to drift into theory, aren't we?
Obviously some theories have been put forward, to account for the above facts. Those theories are disputable. The supporting evidence, such as it is, is not. So I don't know why some people are talking as if the facts are in dispute, and as if the sky falls in on the day they get proven. They were proven already and the sky did not fall in. Fact.
So let's talk about the theories if we want to talk about the theories, but personally, I've nothing to add. I just don't like to see discussions going round in fruitless circles, muddying the facts ever further as they go, just like a bunch of flat-earthers, afraid that a round Earth would somehow break the law of gravity and disprove the existence of god. (in which case, you might reasonably ask, why I'm here then?
). I mean, I'd like to move on from there. Clear enough? I mean Scrap and ALM were PMíng each other , the earth is round; now can we please ask some meaningful questions or STFU?
