You speak as if ideologies were sentient aliens that could "invade" industries, like Hollywood. There are a lot of problems with Hollywood...I would say progressivism is among the least of their concerns.
Also, what do you have against feminism?
I was taught that feminism is the awareness of and commitment towards the fair, non-demeaning treatment of females and femmes in all areas of school, work, family, and politics. Basically, for the elevated dignity of women to the status of human beings. It wasn't until I began working that I realised the burgeoning necessity of feminism, and of being aware of discriminatory practices (this is based on what I saw happen with my coworkers). Now, people can take this concept of feminism and apply it in different ways, and I would say I dont necessarily agree with all feminists, but I agree with their freedom to question the status quo. In the same way I don't agree with all human rights activists, but I understand their desire to be treated with dignity.
That said, I would consider myself a feminist, and what does my feminism look like? I am very conscious when I am with children (any gender) to show and speak of female role models along with males. I am conscious at work to not underestimate the strength of my colleagues, and to avoid making comments/jokes about sex (female/male), and to not engage in the sorts of man-bro convos that can demean a whole gender. Now, am I known at work to be overly vocal or a police? Nope. I'm friends with most everyone and we are much like a family. Admittedly, many of us are aware of feminism, civil rights, and other diversity based issues and we tend to create a safe dignified environment for our team.
At any rate- feminism doesn't invade, neither does anything else. People turn to politics and ideologies as a way to help express something they are feeling, or that they agree with. My theory is that some people use hate as their base for a politic, and hate as a base for any politic automatically disqualifies it as viable for a general population, because hate in its core means that it will be dangerous to part of the population. I wouldn't trust a political argument that hated men, nor an argument that hated the rich. On the other end, one doesnt have to make love the base, although that usually is a more inclusive base for a politic...but some good bases are truth (paying attention to facts), dignity (striving for dignified treatment), diversity (putting a spotlight on improvements in inclusion), life (paying attention to conditions for health and good living).
Trumps politics are, at their core, about division and hatred. The statements he has made reflect this. The statements his "base" have been making reflect this. He is also about feeding his ego, which is a type of carelessness just as bad as hatred, when left unchecked. This is enough for me to be repulsed by his person, his party, and all those who shrug their shoulders at his carelessness-so long as they aren't the target.
He is simply not a leader, and should never have been put into the position to do something he does not know how to do, well or at all. That is my observation.