It was NEVER about my signature....Odeon is trying to rewrite a narrative.

[Al Swearegen]

So you're saying it's *my* responsibility to have your sig removed, not yours? That's rich.

Fuck off, Al. You remain delusional.

If you didn't want it removed I am cool with that if you did I would have been cool with that too. It is not rich it is fucking obvious.

At a truce the things said or done previously are (if not forgiven) accepted as done and at an end. I do not expect or demand you to explain anything more nor delete posts or remove signatures or give me any special benefit or restore anything. It is simply an acknowledgement that what is done is done and GOING forward and REGARDLESS of what was said or done in the past, you will bi-laterally agree to cease further hostilities and further efforts to incite or get personal.

So Yes Odeon you do NOT get to bitch about a signature that hurt your feelings NOW. That is fucking pathetic.

If there was a signature you wanted changed, from before the truce, you could have asked. If there was a thread you particularly wanted deleted, from before the truce, you could have asked. If there was a post you wanted deleted, from before the truce, you could have asked. If there was an apology you want made about something I said, from before the truce, you could have asked. If there was something you needed me to clarify publicly, from before the truce, you could have asked. It is NOT to say I would have done or not done any of these things but you do not agree to a truce and then whine 7 months later that there was pre-conditions you did not ask for at any point, and further pretend this lack of responsibility is somehow projected at me. You could have asked or said it was non-negotiable or would be goodwill or simply a nice gesture, Hell I did not care, I don't really recall what was on it in any case. You didn't ask or mention it until now. It is clear why.

That is COMPLETELY on you. We know it is a bullshit narrative just like your bullshit "I was just reminding you, that you had a daughter" narrative was bullshit and just as the narrative it has morphed into which seems to be "You needed to be reminded about your daughter to consider another perspective"

You are a lying scumbag Odeon.

[Yuri Bezmenov]

Odeot still never explained why "My mother was a whore who loved the taste of Arab cock" was against the TOS.   

[Calandale]

Odeot still never explained why "My mother was a whore who loved the taste of Arab cock" was against the TOS.   

Maybe he thought you were doxing him?

[Yuri Bezmenov]

[Minister Of Silly Walks]

Textbook gaslighting.

Like most gaslighters, Al isn't even aware he is doing it. He appears to believe the crazed narratives he creates in his own mind, and the gullible and weak of mind fall into step.

[Yuri Bezmenov]

Textbook gaslighting.

Care to elaborate?

[Minister Of Silly Walks]

Textbook gaslighting.

Care to elaborate?

Sure. It's a lengthy diatribe full of accusatory and emotive and authoritative language. It positions himself as the righteous victim and Odeon as a kind of weak, pathetic villain.

[Yuri Bezmenov]

Textbook gaslighting.

Care to elaborate?

Sure. It's a lengthy diatribe full of accusatory and emotive and authoritative language. It positions himself as the righteous victim and Odeon as a kind of weak, pathetic villain.

That's not necessarily gaslighting.

Odeot has been described as a weak pathetic villain by several people, including those who knew him personally.

Just look at his abuse of the admin tools, that screams weaksauce.

[Minister Of Silly Walks]

Textbook gaslighting.

Care to elaborate?

Sure. It's a lengthy diatribe full of accusatory and emotive and authoritative language. It positions himself as the righteous victim and Odeon as a kind of weak, pathetic villain.

That's not necessarily gaslighting.

Odeot has been described as a weak pathetic villain by several people, including those who knew him personally.

Just look at his abuse of the admin tools, that screams weaksauce.

Of course it's not gaslighting if everything in that diatribe is true.

Then it's just truth that looks a hell of a lot like textbook gaslighting.

You know what they say about stuff that looks like a and quacks like a ....

[Al Swearegen]

Textbook gaslighting.

Care to elaborate?

Sure. It's a lengthy diatribe full of accusatory and emotive and authoritative language. It positions himself as the righteous victim and Odeon as a kind of weak, pathetic villain.

That's not necessarily gaslighting.

Odeot has been described as a weak pathetic villain by several people, including those who knew him personally.

Just look at his abuse of the admin tools, that screams weaksauce.

Of course it's not gaslighting if everything in that diatribe is true.

Then it's just truth that looks a hell of a lot like textbook gaslighting.

You know what they say about stuff that looks like a and quacks like a ....

Except of course it does not look like textbook gaslighting and only the very stupid or very dishonest would say so.
Scrap makes the point. If it is honest and demonstrably so or reasonably inferred then it is not gaslighting.
I would really like to make specific claims but I do not need to. I make reasonable claims based on cited behaviours and examples. They are often the diatribes I get accused of making. I set it out.

This too is completely unlike gaslighting, to draw in examples to back claims.

So no, it does not look like a at all. Calling it so does not make it so. Only wishful thinking works that way. Bastion of children and the irredeemably stupid.

[Minister Of Silly Walks]

You can all you want

You still look like a

[Al Swearegen]

You can all you want

You still look like a

[Icequeen]

[Al Swearegen]

[Icequeen]