Author Topic: The Tragedy in Las Vegas  (Read 19658 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108911
  • Karma: 4482
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #240 on: October 21, 2017, 03:10:57 PM »
I find assigned sides in arguments boring because it will usually--not always--kill the passion. I also tend to think that if you don't believe in an argument, why do it in the first place?
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein

Offline Jack

  • Reiterative Utterance of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 14550
  • Karma: 0
  • You don't know Jack.
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #241 on: October 21, 2017, 03:44:39 PM »
I find assigned sides in arguments boring because it will usually--not always--kill the passion. I also tend to think that if you don't believe in an argument, why do it in the first place?
Am the opposite and find spouting my own rigid opinions to be boring. It leaves no room for conversation other than agreement, which is boring too, and only fuels a self-serving sense of importance in what I think. It's rare in certain types of discussions for there to be a simple right and wrong, and it's hard to know how to deal with opposition if unwilling to have an appreciation for it. Plus sometimes some of the things I think are just interesting to think. Lacking in any real passion, and even recognizing some level of absurdity in it, doesn't make it any less interesting to think. Shouldn't necessarily have to believe in something to make it worth discussing.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2017, 03:54:33 PM by Jack »

Offline Fun With Matches

  • Elder
  • Dedicated Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 3515
  • Karma: 225
  • Delicious and refreshing.
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #242 on: October 21, 2017, 04:29:55 PM »
^ Damn I wish I could plus you.
:dog:

Offline Jack

  • Reiterative Utterance of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 14550
  • Karma: 0
  • You don't know Jack.
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #243 on: October 21, 2017, 06:28:00 PM »
^ Damn I wish I could plus you.
Not sure how plus worthy that is. People are just different. Odeon mentioned something worth consideration, and that's passion, which is different than stubbornness. When considering personal passions, they're all people, things, information, or activities, so can't really claim to even have an understanding of what it means to be truly passionate about an opinion, belief, or philosophy. That in itself may be a great and important thing and I don't know how to relate to it. Really only know how to relate to being stubborn about ideas.

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108911
  • Karma: 4482
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #244 on: October 22, 2017, 01:50:18 AM »
I find assigned sides in arguments boring because it will usually--not always--kill the passion. I also tend to think that if you don't believe in an argument, why do it in the first place?
Am the opposite and find spouting my own rigid opinions to be boring. It leaves no room for conversation other than agreement, which is boring too, and only fuels a self-serving sense of importance in what I think. It's rare in certain types of discussions for there to be a simple right and wrong, and it's hard to know how to deal with opposition if unwilling to have an appreciation for it. Plus sometimes some of the things I think are just interesting to think. Lacking in any real passion, and even recognizing some level of absurdity in it, doesn't make it any less interesting to think. Shouldn't necessarily have to believe in something to make it worth discussing.

I certainly agree that you can--and frequently should--discuss things without believing in them, but that's not the same as having a side assigned to you. I'd assume that in the former, something makes it interesting enough to be discussed whereas in the latter, it's simply an exercise.

But we're different and that, in itself, is a good thing.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein

Offline Parts

  • The Mad
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 37477
  • Karma: 3062
  • Gender: Female
  • Who are you?
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #245 on: October 22, 2017, 08:45:22 AM »
Getting away from any of the debates on guns and meds and back to it as a whole.  This has to be one of the strangest incidents like this in a long time with the changing timelines, odd police response and lack of motive even after weeks of looking. The whole thing is  playing out like some sort of movie plot :zombiefuck:   In Vegas there are cameras everywhere and I mean everywhere they should be able to track is every move from the moment he came in on the highway till he entered his room
"Eat it up.  Wear it out.  Make it do or do without." 

'People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.'
George Bernard Shaw

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108911
  • Karma: 4482
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #246 on: October 23, 2017, 12:16:23 AM »
Yeah, it's weird. One would think they'd be able to track him.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein

Offline El

  • Unofficial Weird News Reporter of the Aspie Elite
  • News Box Slave
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 21926
  • Karma: 2615
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #247 on: October 23, 2017, 06:03:47 AM »
By people, do you mean the prison guards, during the incarceration? I don't see any viable way to enforce medication after the end of a sentence.

Maybe if I had more faith in medication as a long term and lasting solution to psychological issues, I could see it working, but the mind is more complex than that. Chemical imbalances are interwoven with conscious attitudes and patterns of experience and history. That's not the sort of thing you can make go away with a convenient little pill. Even mandated therapy, like anger management classes, is questionable. Do the people who are forced to attend actually have any lasting changes in behavior, or are they just being warm bodies in a room, learning to give the answers that people are looking for?
A subset of the probation clients my company treats do seem to eventually get something out of it; another subset are clearly just playing the game.  (Same with our DCF clients.)

We're really blessed to have a couple of clinicians who're especially good at empathically and nonjudgementally connecting with that population, and I think that helps.
it is well known that PMS Elle is evil.
I think you'd fit in a 12" or at least a 16" firework mortar
You win this thread because that's most unsettling to even think about.

Offline Pyraxis

  • Werewolf Wrangler of the Aspie Elite
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 16680
  • Karma: 1433
  • aka Daria
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #248 on: October 23, 2017, 10:49:49 AM »
Getting away from any of the debates on guns and meds and back to it as a whole.  This has to be one of the strangest incidents like this in a long time with the changing timelines, odd police response and lack of motive even after weeks of looking. The whole thing is  playing out like some sort of movie plot :zombiefuck:   In Vegas there are cameras everywhere and I mean everywhere they should be able to track is every move from the moment he came in on the highway till he entered his room

I don't understand why everyone thinks there is no motive. His father was a notorious criminal, FFS. What happened to classic human motivations like wanting to outdo Daddy or wanting to live up to Daddy? Or a simple genetic inheritance of antisocial traits?
You'll never self-actualize the subconscious canopy of stardust with that attitude.

Offline Pyraxis

  • Werewolf Wrangler of the Aspie Elite
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 16680
  • Karma: 1433
  • aka Daria
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #249 on: October 23, 2017, 10:51:27 AM »
In Vegas there are cameras everywhere and I mean everywhere they should be able to track is every move from the moment he came in on the highway till he entered his room

Is it that they can't track him, or they don't want to release the information they have about where/how he was tracked?
You'll never self-actualize the subconscious canopy of stardust with that attitude.

Offline Lestat

  • Pharmaceutical dustbin of the autie elite
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 8965
  • Karma: 451
  • Gender: Male
  • Homo stercore veteris, heterodiem
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #250 on: October 23, 2017, 05:27:22 PM »
Jack-to answer the question as to why generically giving any one group of medication-requiring prisoners the same medication or type of med from a class of similarly acting meds (E.g antipsychotics, antidepressants of various types etc.) without regard to the prisoner's individual response then yes, it could. Antipsychotics in particular are very unpleasant drugs, and are pretty toxic, in the short term capable of causing very unpleasant side effects, severe akathisia, dystonic reactions and other extrapyramidal reactions, and are mentally dulling, and stulting, plenty of people taking them would rather be dead than stuck on the neuroleptics.

Chronically they can cause tardive reactions, such as tardive dyskinesia or dystonias, which are PERMANENT, and from everything I've ever read, agonizing, and a fate worse than death. Also, in the acute timeframe, some people, who are extremely sensitive to D2 dopamine receptor antagonists (the primary mechanism of action for most antipsychotics) can develop a condition called malignant hyperthermia, which can resut in rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue, the byproducts of the destroyed muscle tissue then flood the kidneys and cause kidney failure, in addition to potential for brain damage due to the severe hyperthermia. Untreated (and it requires hospital treatment, and rapidly. If it occurs, the prisoner would be incapacitated and unable themseves to request assistance. And if they did they probably would just be dismissed as malingering and fucked off. Or assumed to be trying to get to a hospital, and escape under lesser security.)

Untreated, malignant hyperthermia has a death rate of about 75 percent. Treated in hospital the fatality rate is reduced to just 5% or so. It requires, usually a drug called dantrolene, hospitals have to carry it, but it is not a drug which would be stocked in a prison, its a specialist treatment for malignant hyperthermia and used in serotonin syndrome to prevent rhabdomyolysis, being a directly acting skeletal muscle relaxant, acting directy on muscle tissue via ryanodine receptors, even if prisons did have access to dantrolene they wouldn't know how to use it. And its injection only.

And just the side effects in general would make a lot of people suffer, and those who are misdiagnosed by halfarsed prison doctors that are more concerned with avoiding any prisoner getting anything potentially recreational than they are with actually treating disease (this is true, I've seen it, I've been a victim of it. They'd rather leave me having repeated grand-mal seizures for months and nearly starve to death as a result, in a near delirious state, than allow me a benzodiazepine, or chlormethiazole as I was already prescribed before being nicked, and at the same time, aggravating the problem and leaving me in a living breathing hell by forcing me cold-turkey from my GP-prescribed oxycontin (80mg OCs several times daily) and fobbing me off with a completely, utterly useless 8/500 codeine/paracetamol. Which needless to say to a longterm chronic pain patient is absolutely without action. They even had the cheek to tell me they were being generous in giving me TWO of those per day!. They almost did kill me. I'm pretty surprised they didn't.

And they tried putting me on mirtazepine, another time, because I've always had trouble sleeping, after I rejected an antipsychotic for use as a sedative (I was lucky in that I already knew I cannot take them, because I'm hypersensitive to D2 antagonists, I can't even take domperidone, the antiemetic, which is a weak D2 antagonist that isn't meant to cross the blood-brain barrier. And I've had the misfortune, after being hospitalized due to a real nasty ass bout of food poisoning to be treated with trifluoroperazine, to which I reacted very badly indeed. I was cautious, as I'd never taken it before, with the mirtazepine, and took just a small portion of the lowest dose tablets available, took just 2.5mg to start with. Its primarily a sedating antihistamine, and tetracyclic antidepressant, in fact it is, if I am not mistaken the antihistamine with the lowest Ki in medical use (lower Ki values mean higher potency), but its also an alpha2 adrenergic autoreceptor antagonist, like for example, yohimbine, and causes release of noradrenaline. I also cannot tolerate most adrenergic drugs, at least unless adrenergic release is a side-trait when accompanied by dopamine release, and even then in small quantities (low dose amphetamines for example, or with stimulants that can be dosed at high levels and tolerated, they MUST, for me, be highly selective DA-releasers or DA-reuptake inhibitors, with the Ki for DAT vastly lower than that for NET (noradrenaline transporter) or NA release. For example, the selective NA releasers ephedrine or pseudoephedrine are poison to me and make me feel like hell. Yet with the additional dopaminergic activity of amphetamine or methamphetamine/ethamphetamine, even racemic amphetamines (the laevo-isomers having primarily just noradrenergic activity) I can tolerate low doses. With pure dextro-isomers I can tolerate more, and with those psychostimulants which act as extremely selective dopamine reuptake inhibitors or releasers I'm fine (plenty have some serotonergic activity too, which doesn't really act badly with me, although SSRIs don't agree with me)

But the mirtazepine, causing the unmitigated noradrenaline release, that reacted so badly that I felt so horrible that I would have thrown myself out of a window, if only it would make it stop. It was that bad. Words cannot even describe the absolute utter misery that even that tiny test dose caused me. The remainder went straight down the toilet.

So yes, casually fucking about like prison doctors do, they are idiots and they have zero compassion, could easily end up killing a prisoner. It nearly killed ME. By the time I'd stopped seizing as a direct result of them terminating my antiseizure medication cold turkey (which even a student trainee would know never, ever to do, because it can easily be lethal, and will almost certainly cause grand-mal convulsions), by the time it stopped of its own accord (the physical withdrawal) it'd been so long, I had almost fucking starved to death, and was very severely dehydrated. Ever seen  the pictures of starved auschwitz victims or other nazi death camp liberated victims? thats what I fucking looked like. I'd gone from my usual nine stone nine to barely able to stand, and barely able physically to eat when I again could see that there was food thrown at me.

I won't go into the worst of it. And what I've just described wasn't. I can't. I just can't. And it took a long time after I got out (after being wrongfully remanded for something I was not responsible for, and ending up, after 8 months or so, just tagged for a short time with an ankle-tag and curfew) and a lot of entactogen/psychedelic catalyzed solitary meditation, in a favourite little quiet woodland grove, that I've always found a peaceful place, and amongst the forests, a favourite spot. Its only small, a few tens of meters, but soft broken down leaflitter, surrounded by large stands of scented basam, with a couple of large beech trees, I've liked this particular spot since I was a kid, so it was there I chose to spend much of my meditation time, using AMT and a low-dose dissociative to help maintain a sort of emotional detachment from the worst of it, so I could stand by and be there at the same time, if that makes sense. (AMT, short for alpha-methytryptamine is both an empathogen/entactogen like MDMA, and a bona-fide 5HT2a agonist psychedelic (its also a rather weak MAOI and a moderatey powerful psychostimulant, although the MAOI effects are weak enough that AMT can be safely taken without serotonin syndrome)

And with its help, I eventually managed, with some intensive self-psychoanalysis, meditation and time spent integrating things, to come to terms with the worst of it, and deal with the resultant PTSD. I don't think I'd have been at all comfortable talking to a therapist about it, any of it, and didn't even try seeking one out. But I dealt with it myself, not without difficulty and much effort put into it. But I did succeed in dealing with it, and for the vast part, curing mysef of the PTSD.

I still can't talk about most of what happened, but I no longer suffer the terrifying nightmares, the waking up screaming and sweating bullets, the shaking like crazy, hand tremors. Used to be in a state of hypervigilance, extreme, constant fight-flight state of stress response. Now I've managed to rid mysef of most of it. I still take an adrenergic blocking agent (two, actually, although one of them is taken as a muscle relaxant due to some nerve damage in my leg after a botched knee surgery) but incidentally works the same way exactly, as the clonidine I take to block the excessive overloading that is still a residue of the trauma (its an alpha2 adrenoreceptor agonist, works in exactly the opposite way to the side-effect of that awful shit mirtazepine that made me just want to fucking well go die in a fire. And it both helps me not overload, but in blocking noradrenaline release helps deal with overstimulation too. The other one is tizanidine, the muscle relaxer, although they both work in a very similar way. There are some side-effects, especially with using the two in combination, mainly a powerful drop in blood pressure, and orthostatic hypotension as a result, which means that when changing from a recumbent position to standing, my heart doesn't compensate with an increase in BP fast enough, and as a result, I have to stand bent double, as if bowing, and then slowly rise to allow for the slower compensatory rise in BP, otherwise it can drop so low on standing too quickly that my legs start twitching and give out, and I pass out, or else stay conscious but just can't maintain any muscle tone and hit the deck, although quickly recover as soon as I do, when I flatten out, and my BP returns to the (albeit lowered) resting rate.
Beyond the pale. Way, way beyond the pale.

Requiescat in pacem, Wolfish, beloved of Pyraxis.

Offline Jack

  • Reiterative Utterance of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 14550
  • Karma: 0
  • You don't know Jack.
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #251 on: October 23, 2017, 05:46:25 PM »
Getting away from any of the debates on guns and meds and back to it as a whole.  This has to be one of the strangest incidents like this in a long time with the changing timelines, odd police response and lack of motive even after weeks of looking. The whole thing is  playing out like some sort of movie plot :zombiefuck:   In Vegas there are cameras everywhere and I mean everywhere they should be able to track is every move from the moment he came in on the highway till he entered his room

I don't understand why everyone thinks there is no motive. His father was a notorious criminal, FFS. What happened to classic human motivations like wanting to outdo Daddy or wanting to live up to Daddy? Or a simple genetic inheritance of antisocial traits?
Lack of obvious motive. These things typically involve some sort of research trail, documented planning, or manifesto left behind.

Is it that they can't track him, or they don't want to release the information they have about where/how he was tracked?
It's related to the sequence of events. A security guard at the hotel was shot and the official statement changed as to when that occurred.

Offline Jack

  • Reiterative Utterance of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 14550
  • Karma: 0
  • You don't know Jack.
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #252 on: October 23, 2017, 06:01:01 PM »
without regard to the prisoner's individual response
Not sure why it's been interpreted as a suggestion to disregard an individual's response to medication. The complexity of the individual could just as easily be used as an argument that no one in prison should receive psychotropic medications for any reason at all. The suggestion being presented is that violent criminals are dangerously mentally unstable by the mere symptom of their violence, and for them to be treated as such. Suggesting mandated mental healthcare as a standard rule of thumb is more compassionate than suggesting permanent removal from society, but either of those solutions is being suggested as better than the current one.

Offline Yuri Bezmenov

  • Drunk-assed squadron leader
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 6663
  • Karma: 0
  • Communist propaganda is demoralizing the West.
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #253 on: October 23, 2017, 07:03:17 PM »
I find assigned sides in arguments boring because it will usually--not always--kill the passion. I also tend to think that if you don't believe in an argument, why do it in the first place?

To quote Bertram Russell: He who only knows his own side of an argument, knows very little of that.

Well, well, well, haven't you proven that in spades.   :hahaha:

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108911
  • Karma: 4482
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: The Tragedy in Las Vegas
« Reply #254 on: October 23, 2017, 11:55:16 PM »
I find assigned sides in arguments boring because it will usually--not always--kill the passion. I also tend to think that if you don't believe in an argument, why do it in the first place?

To quote Bertram Russell: He who only knows his own side of an argument, knows very little of that.

Well, well, well, haven't you proven that in spades.   :hahaha:

If you were a superhero, your special power would be superhuman misunderstanding of anything.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein