Why not provide the context and get the whole thing right? You're as bad as Trump, you're using a tragedy for advancing your (narrow and bigoted) views.
Fucking idiot.
Are you calling me a bigot, r
apist? That has never ended well.
As to your context. When I bought up how serious and how frequent and dangerous radical Islamic Extremism was, you dismissed it with statistics on falling furniture occurences and how infrequent these attacks are and how unlikely these people (who had at that time had just been killed and were not even cold yet) were unlikely to be killed and neither was anyone.
It was disgusting and inappropriate and I stated it to be so and said I would introduce your falling furniture as an analogy and dismissal of such victims every time another incident happened and that it would keep happening.
Now you find my behaviour unacceptable because it mirrors your own dismissiveness. Equating victims of radical Muslim Extremists with victims of falling furniture and waving away a tragedy is suddenly poor form. At the moment you thought yourself defending Muslims I suppose, and in that moment the dismissal was ideologically okay.
It was not and isn't. Pointing out that these are all done by radical Muslim Extremists is not bigoted. It never was. It's a charge you keep making because in your mind you cannot conceive of the notion that no one thinks all Muslims are or will be radical Muslim Extremists. You see that term and you lose your shit. You start defending positions that were never taken.
None of us said Muslims are bad but we do say radical Muslim Extremists are. They are killing people in number and frequently. Calling them out for what they do when they do it, is completely legitimate and defensible. It is not bigoted.
Dismissing it or calling people who point it out or discuss it it fucking reprehensible. You are an ideological zealot and idiot.
