Could be Trump?

[odeon]

So they have a couple of bombs they need to use by next year? My question stands.

[Al Swearegen]

So they have a couple of bombs they need to use by next year? My question stands.

Seems a problem by the looks. I wrote four sentences and you managed to read two of them. No wonder you are not acting on all the information at your disposal.

Possibly why you are not able to make way in your callout.

Read more, Odeon, before you comment on it.

[Jack]

Here are some basics for you to start with.

NASA has good visuals. Though one noticed was this one for light pollution. https://climate.nasa.gov/images-of-change?id=566#566-light-pollution-milan This is a change personally noticed over the years from airplanes at night, as cities migrate to LED street lighting, the nighttime landscape is transforming from an amber glow to bright white. Though that's an energy conservation type of change, so seemed odd to include it with changes otherwise viewed as negative.

[Fun With Matches]

Here are some basics for you to start with.

NASA has good visuals. Though one noticed was this one for light pollution. https://climate.nasa.gov/images-of-change?id=566#566-light-pollution-milan This is a change personally noticed over the years from airplanes at night, as cities migrate to LED street lighting, the nighttime landscape is transforming from an amber glow to bright white. Though that's an energy conservation type of change, so seemed odd to include it with changes otherwise viewed as negative.

Very cool, and good point.

[Jack]

Here are some basics for you to start with.

NASA has good visuals. Though one noticed was this one for light pollution. https://climate.nasa.gov/images-of-change?id=566#566-light-pollution-milan This is a change personally noticed over the years from airplanes at night, as cities migrate to LED street lighting, the nighttime landscape is transforming from an amber glow to bright white. Though that's an energy conservation type of change, so seemed odd to include it with changes otherwise viewed as negative.

Very cool, and good point.

At first it was annoying; would assume the people at NASA are smart enough know what they're looking at in those images, so thought they might assume I'm not. Many of the images, it's true I'm not. People are often spoonfed crap and assumed to swallow it, so it cast a bit of a cloud over the slideshow, because that particular bite came across as being fed crap someone simply wants me to consume. Although, there's also a single image in there of a solar farm, and another of a newly created dam. There's a couple of agricultural development and urban growth too. Not really sure what images like that are intended to convey as evidence of climate change when mixed with such a heavy concentration of receding glaciers, floods, droughts, and wildfires.

[Gopher Gary]

I would like to know how digging holes, fucking anything that,  well ... whatever, stealing grain and hay from those who grow it and being great long range targets for drunken shooters caused the phenomenon we have come to know as Global Climate Change.

I know that Odeon knows things that we do not, but please, identify the connection.
 

It's probably because I'm so freaking hawt. 

[odeon]

So they have a couple of bombs they need to use by next year? My question stands.

Seems a problem by the looks. I wrote four sentences and you managed to read two of them. No wonder you are not acting on all the information at your disposal.

Possibly why you are not able to make way in your callout.

Read more, Odeon, before you comment on it.

You wrote "my understanding", which is an oxymoron, really. Dream on.

[Al Swearegen]

So they have a couple of bombs they need to use by next year? My question stands.

Seems a problem by the looks. I wrote four sentences and you managed to read two of them. No wonder you are not acting on all the information at your disposal.

Possibly why you are not able to make way in your callout.

Read more, Odeon, before you comment on it.

You wrote "my understanding", which is an oxymoron, really. Dream on.

Only an idiot would make that reply.

[odeon]

So they have a couple of bombs they need to use by next year? My question stands.

Seems a problem by the looks. I wrote four sentences and you managed to read two of them. No wonder you are not acting on all the information at your disposal.

Possibly why you are not able to make way in your callout.

Read more, Odeon, before you comment on it.

You wrote "my understanding", which is an oxymoron, really. Dream on.

Only an idiot would make that reply.

Projecting again, Al?

[Al Swearegen]

So they have a couple of bombs they need to use by next year? My question stands.

Seems a problem by the looks. I wrote four sentences and you managed to read two of them. No wonder you are not acting on all the information at your disposal.

Possibly why you are not able to make way in your callout.

Read more, Odeon, before you comment on it.

You wrote "my understanding", which is an oxymoron, really. Dream on.

Only an idiot would make that reply.

Projecting again, Al?

Not at all. My understanding was based on what was said and so your snark falls flat again, because you are an idiot.

[odeon]

Definitely projecting.

[Al Swearegen]

You are a skilled projectionist. You are a master at it. You are also a master at baiting people. Odeon the master baiter.

[odeon]

I was good at it but cinemas are no longer cinemas, you know.

[Al Swearegen]

I was good at it but cinemas are no longer cinemas, you know.

No you still project your own foibles like a pro

[odeon]

I was good at it but cinemas are no longer cinemas, you know.

No you still project your own foibles like a pro

It took you two weeks to come up with this?