I've tried to stop swearing but I cunt.
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: PsychoFreak on March 11, 2016, 09:32:16 AMThe best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. PmslEach to their own For me, the best part was definitely watching you fail to understand that Les had edited Zeghs post, trying to grass Zegh up to Odeon, and then being too embarrassed to admit you were wrong
The best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. Pmsl
Quote from: Butterflies on March 11, 2016, 09:41:51 AMQuote from: PsychoFreak on March 11, 2016, 09:32:16 AMThe best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. PmslEach to their own For me, the best part was definitely watching you fail to understand that Les had edited Zeghs post, trying to grass Zegh up to Odeon, and then being too embarrassed to admit you were wrong Zegh should apologize to both hykes and odeon.
Quote from: PsychoFreak on March 11, 2016, 09:53:53 AMQuote from: Butterflies on March 11, 2016, 09:41:51 AMQuote from: PsychoFreak on March 11, 2016, 09:32:16 AMThe best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. PmslEach to their own For me, the best part was definitely watching you fail to understand that Les had edited Zeghs post, trying to grass Zegh up to Odeon, and then being too embarrassed to admit you were wrong Zegh should apologize to both hykes and odeon.
Quote from: ZEGH8578 on November 19, 2015, 05:01:15 PMHey, check out Sumerian god-kings. There's another example of time in religion. These kings not only lived very long - according to their scriptures - but kept rule for years and years - and centuries - and millenniaDumuzid, "The shepherd" ruled for over 30 000 yearsGood health!I've tried to find out how this even works out, like, how did they figure it?These are human years, they realize this, so they confirm that "yes, Dumuzid ruled for a thousand lifetimes"It is also interesting that these super-long rulers seem to have (if ever) existed around 3000-2900 BC, within a centuryWith the lack of loud suggestions, I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or somethingThis super-long rule tradition gradually cools off, that is also interesting, so there's a mechanic there that we're missing. Rulers go from 10 000 years, to 1000, to 100 (which is still long time to keep rule), to much more likely durations of a few years at the time, some as few as just one.So it is really a choice between whether the Sumerian COULD extend their life 30 000 years....or if they can't. If you say they could, I think I would like some compelling evidence. Or they couldn't, in which case it was likely "slight"exaggeration, mistranslation, father inheriting name and title after dead and repeating cycle over many lifetimes, abstract meaning lost context, or some flat out lie or propaganda. Let's go with the least likely option.Yeah, for sure. Those Sumerians lived 30 000 years. They sparkled in sunlight.
Hey, check out Sumerian god-kings. There's another example of time in religion. These kings not only lived very long - according to their scriptures - but kept rule for years and years - and centuries - and millenniaDumuzid, "The shepherd" ruled for over 30 000 yearsGood health!I've tried to find out how this even works out, like, how did they figure it?These are human years, they realize this, so they confirm that "yes, Dumuzid ruled for a thousand lifetimes"It is also interesting that these super-long rulers seem to have (if ever) existed around 3000-2900 BC, within a centuryWith the lack of loud suggestions, I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or somethingThis super-long rule tradition gradually cools off, that is also interesting, so there's a mechanic there that we're missing. Rulers go from 10 000 years, to 1000, to 100 (which is still long time to keep rule), to much more likely durations of a few years at the time, some as few as just one.
Quote from: Butterflies on March 11, 2016, 09:56:17 AMQuote from: PsychoFreak on March 11, 2016, 09:53:53 AMQuote from: Butterflies on March 11, 2016, 09:41:51 AMQuote from: PsychoFreak on March 11, 2016, 09:32:16 AMThe best part is Zegh thinks he can "teach" anyone anything. PmslEach to their own For me, the best part was definitely watching you fail to understand that Les had edited Zeghs post, trying to grass Zegh up to Odeon, and then being too embarrassed to admit you were wrong Zegh should apologize to both hykes and odeon. Hey butterflies I was giving you a hard time I didn't see the day, didn't look. I'll mention how Zegh never owned up to Al's twilight reference and still won't but I saw it. Quote from: Al Swearengen on November 20, 2015, 01:51:39 AMQuote from: ZEGH8578 on November 19, 2015, 05:01:15 PMHey, check out Sumerian god-kings. There's another example of time in religion. These kings not only lived very long - according to their scriptures - but kept rule for years and years - and centuries - and millenniaDumuzid, "The shepherd" ruled for over 30 000 yearsGood health!I've tried to find out how this even works out, like, how did they figure it?These are human years, they realize this, so they confirm that "yes, Dumuzid ruled for a thousand lifetimes"It is also interesting that these super-long rulers seem to have (if ever) existed around 3000-2900 BC, within a centuryWith the lack of loud suggestions, I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or somethingThis super-long rule tradition gradually cools off, that is also interesting, so there's a mechanic there that we're missing. Rulers go from 10 000 years, to 1000, to 100 (which is still long time to keep rule), to much more likely durations of a few years at the time, some as few as just one.So it is really a choice between whether the Sumerian COULD extend their life 30 000 years....or if they can't. If you say they could, I think I would like some compelling evidence. Or they couldn't, in which case it was likely "slight"exaggeration, mistranslation, father inheriting name and title after dead and repeating cycle over many lifetimes, abstract meaning lost context, or some flat out lie or propaganda. Let's go with the least likely option.Yeah, for sure. Those Sumerians lived 30 000 years. They sparkled in sunlight.
Everything is about "owning up"For example, yesterday I ate salmon. You, Butterflies, now have to own up to that.
Now we have really descended into the I2! Have fun, children!
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!
Quote from: rock hound on March 11, 2016, 05:03:52 PMNow we have really descended into the I2! Have fun, children! I would indeed not advise anyone to drink from this windy glass of water.
I do! I own up to it!I apologize for your constipation :'/