Al, Zegh and Kittenburger, I'm challenging the three of you.

[Bastet]

Lol @ your interpretation

[Al Swearegen]

Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.

Addition 3: Fattieburger's involvement is a tad bit more complex. She has OCD, and couldn't stop if she wanted to. She has even PM-ed people to "warn" them about my "danger" With her it basically begun with me stating that she is an idiot, bluntly, and without explanation. I have since explained it several times, but you know, OCD, what can you do.

[Bastet]

 Zegh made attacks on my appearance before I did his and it was because I said he was jealous. Zegh didn't like I was "sucking al's cock" because he wants his butt kissed.

[ZEGH8578]

Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.

Addition 3: Fattieburger's involvement is a tad bit more complex. She has OCD, and couldn't stop if she wanted to. She has even PM-ed people to "warn" them about my "danger" With her it basically begun with me stating that she is an idiot, bluntly, and without explanation. I have since explained it several times, but you know, OCD, what can you do.

[Al Swearegen]

Just so that this is entirely clarified:

Al is THIS obsessed, and dedicated to stalking me around the forum - dedicated to destroying OTHER people's threads (blaming me)
because
I DO NOT AGREE with his POLITICAL VIEWS.

1. He previously thought I did
2. The fact that I didn't makes him react even more.

TO BE CLEAR
I DO NOT RESPOND TO HARASSMENT, I AM NOT GOING TO CHANGE MY POLITICAL VIEWS BECAUSE OF A LOSER THROWING A TANTRUM, HOLDING A FORUM HOSTAGE.

What if this was turned around? What if I went sabotaging every thread on the forum, because HE does not agree with MY political views?

Addition: I admit that I did NOT WANT to DEBATE that particular political issue with him. This offended him, and he opened the Call-Out, to discuss politics with me there, because he thought I would feel obliged to respond. I did not feel obliged.
This is the "responsability" he is refering to.

Addition 2: THIS post is the first time I lower myself to HIS level, and talk about HIM as if he was not here, like HE has done with ME in OVER 20 posts. I usually address him directly.

Addition 3: Fattieburger's involvement is a tad bit more complex. She has OCD, and couldn't stop if she wanted to. She has even PM-ed people to "warn" them about my "danger" With her it basically begun with me stating that she is an idiot, bluntly, and without explanation. I have since explained it several times, but you know, OCD, what can you do.

['Butterflies']

I especially love how Zegh minimizes this incident lolololololololol he went completely silent when he was made a fool by al.

Ok, you want someone to reply to this, you thick redneck.

Here is Zeghs post:

Hey, check out Sumerian god-kings. There's another example of time in religion. These kings not only lived very long - according to their scriptures - but kept rule for years and years - and centuries - and millennia

Dumuzid, "The shepherd" ruled for over 30 000 years
Good health!

I've tried to find out how this even works out, like, how did they figure it?
These are human years, they realize this, so they confirm that "yes, Dumuzid ruled for a thousand lifetimes"

It is also interesting that these super-long rulers seem to have (if ever) existed around 3000-2900 BC, within a century

With the lack of loud suggestions, I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

This super-long rule tradition gradually cools off, that is also interesting, so there's a mechanic there that we're missing. Rulers go from 10 000 years, to 1000, to 100 (which is still long time to keep rule), to much more likely durations of a few years at the time, some as few as just one.

Now, the most cursory of reads, simply looking at the tone of Zeghs post, strongly hints that Zegh is not in any way suggesting that Dumuzid actually lived for 36000 years.

However, if you're unable to deduce Zeghs opinion from the tone of his post, then these two sentences spell out Zeghs opinion in black and white:

I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

There is clearly some utter stupidity going on here, but it's certainly not coming from Zegh. At first glance, it appears to be coming from Les, but I'm prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume that he's deliberately misrepresenting Zeghs comments.

If Les is aware that he's misrepresenting Zeghs post, then that leaves you as the sole source of this epic triumph of ignorance

[Bastet]

I especially love how Zegh minimizes this incident lolololololololol he went completely silent when he was made a fool by al.

Ok, you want someone to reply to this, you thick redneck.

Here is Zeghs post:

Hey, check out Sumerian god-kings. There's another example of time in religion. These kings not only lived very long - according to their scriptures - but kept rule for years and years - and centuries - and millennia

Dumuzid, "The shepherd" ruled for over 30 000 years
Good health!

I've tried to find out how this even works out, like, how did they figure it?
These are human years, they realize this, so they confirm that "yes, Dumuzid ruled for a thousand lifetimes"

It is also interesting that these super-long rulers seem to have (if ever) existed around 3000-2900 BC, within a century

With the lack of loud suggestions, I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

This super-long rule tradition gradually cools off, that is also interesting, so there's a mechanic there that we're missing. Rulers go from 10 000 years, to 1000, to 100 (which is still long time to keep rule), to much more likely durations of a few years at the time, some as few as just one.

Now, the most cursory of reads, simply looking at the tone of Zeghs post, strongly hints that Zegh is not in any way suggesting that Dumuzid actually lived for 36000 years.

However, if you're unable to deduce Zeghs opinion from the tone of his post, then these two sentences spell out Zeghs opinion in black and white:

I've imagined that it could be as simple as political gimmick of the days. Maybe nobody really believed that ol Dumuzid had kept the throne for 36 000 years, but that it was a time "granted" to him, like a title or something

There is clearly some utter stupidity going on here, but it's certainly not coming from Zegh. At first glance, it appears to be coming from Les, but I'm prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume that he's deliberately misrepresenting Zeghs comments.

If Les is aware that he's misrepresenting Zeghs post, then that leaves you as the sole source of this epic triumph of ignorance

Zegh got trolled you idiot. Look who's not admitting it. Liar liar.

[ZEGH8578]

Wait, we've been unaware of this, this entire time?

AL IS TROLLING?

OH MY GOD, THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING :O

[Bastet]

 


On being an idiot. You blatantly missed the twilight reference when laughed at you still didn't get it like the idiot that you are. Now you are trying to gloss over it.

[ZEGH8578]

On being an idiot. You blatantly missed the twilight reference when laughed at you still didn't get it like the idiot that you are. Now you are trying to gloss over it.

You sure are obsessed with that twilight reference.
(I didn't watch twilight...  )

Also, you can't "blatantly miss" something. Blatant means to do something without shame, do something openly and deliberately. To miss something is to be unaware of something.
I can't be unaware of something deliberately.

Learn English.

[Bastet]

On being an idiot. You blatantly missed the twilight reference when laughed at you still didn't get it like the idiot that you are. Now you are trying to gloss over it.

You sure are obsessed with that twilight reference.
(I didn't watch twilight...  )

Also, you can't "blatantly miss" something. Blatant means to do something without shame, do something openly and deliberately. To miss something is to be unaware of something.
I can't be unaware of something deliberately.

Learn English.

I didn't watch twilight either, never read the books. It is common knowledge that it is about sparkly vampires. There are countless Internet memes and parodies. People complaining about Stephenie Meyers lack of writing skills.


You nitpicking about a single word is childish, and so very you. My medications have messed with my memory, so I forgot much of what I've learned. I'm sure you'll make fun of that, too.

[ZEGH8578]

Wait, wait, wait...

You've medicated your memory away? WHAT DOES THAT REMIND ME OF? HMMM...
Oh, the word "projection" :O

Another thing comes to mind too, OH, yes, it's boo-fuckin-hoo

[Bastet]

Not self medicated. I've been prescribed meds by doctors you dingbat.

[ZEGH8578]

No need to get defensive
Oh, wait, who am I talking to

GET DEFENSIVE!
Why are you getting meds prescribed by The Doctor? :o

[Bastet]

 

You are grasping at straws again.

More circle jerking to be expected.