When the law doesn't apply to you

[benjimanbreeg]

For the love of goddam god. I'm going to say it one more time, then I'm really quitting, because at this point I'd bet money you're just going to come right back and say, but, but, but definitions. Yes, Israel has holocaust denial laws, but I don't see those laws say anything at all that applies to point 5 of the IHRA's definiiton. There's no law for point 5. You posted their laws yourself. It really isn't that complicated. Yes, he's a holocaust denier according to point 5 of the IHRA's definition. So what? I have never once argued against that.

Jesus.  Even in Israel's laws it says

 "A person who, in writing or by word of mouth, publishes any statement denying or diminishing the proportions of acts committed in the period of the Nazi regime, which are crimes against the Jewish people or crimes against humanity, with intent to defend the perpetrators of those acts or to express sympathy or identification with them, shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of five years."

Which for the most part would apply to Bibi.

['andersom']

For the love of goddam god. I'm going to say it one more time, then I'm really quitting, because at this point I'd bet money you're just going to come right back and say, but, but, but definitions. Yes, Israel has holocaust denial laws, but I don't see those laws say anything at all that applies to point 5 of the IHRA's definiiton. There's no law for point 5. You posted their laws yourself. It really isn't that complicated. Yes, he's a holocaust denier according to point 5 of the IHRA's definition. So what? I have never once argued against that.

Jesus.  Even in Israel's laws it says

 "A person who, in writing or by word of mouth, publishes any statement denying or diminishing the proportions of acts committed in the period of the Nazi regime, which are crimes against the Jewish people or crimes against humanity, with intent to defend the perpetrators of those acts or to express sympathy or identification with them, shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of five years."

Which for the most part would apply to Bibi.

Didn't Bibi "only" add an other person as the one with the original idea to all that happened. Not taking any blame from those to blame. "Only" adding the mufti?

[Gopher Gary]

Don't wear it out!

I'm going to echo it until you're sick of hearing it. 

[benjimanbreeg]

For the love of goddam god. I'm going to say it one more time, then I'm really quitting, because at this point I'd bet money you're just going to come right back and say, but, but, but definitions. Yes, Israel has holocaust denial laws, but I don't see those laws say anything at all that applies to point 5 of the IHRA's definiiton. There's no law for point 5. You posted their laws yourself. It really isn't that complicated. Yes, he's a holocaust denier according to point 5 of the IHRA's definition. So what? I have never once argued against that.

Jesus.  Even in Israel's laws it says

 "A person who, in writing or by word of mouth, publishes any statement denying or diminishing the proportions of acts committed in the period of the Nazi regime, which are crimes against the Jewish people or crimes against humanity, with intent to defend the perpetrators of those acts or to express sympathy or identification with them, shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of five years."

Which for the most part would apply to Bibi.

Didn't Bibi "only" add an other person as the one with the original idea to all that happened. Not taking any blame from those to blame. "Only" adding the mufti?

No, he said that Hitler didn't want to kill masses of Joos, he just wanted to deport them, but the Mufti convinced him to carry out the mass killings.