Christ... "the truth about", you DO realize that all that is allready on Wikipedia, right?
Also, I knew about the history of the confederate flag. Mindboggling, right? I knew about it for years. I know things! You don't. You think these things are new and intriguing.
"MYTH: The Confederate Flags are an authorized symbol of Aryan, KKK and hate groups."
Those who think that are simply stupid, and should read some Wikipedia.
The problem was never about people believing the flag is an OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED Flag Of Niggerhate. What you are using there, is a simple trick of deflection.
The problem is that the flag reminds people of racism, emotionally. Yes, laugh all you like, badass, anarchistic, unruly you, laugh at the emotional people - but THAT is the issue. It is an issue of emotion (social) and politics (political), in combination.
You are fully entitled to call it "bullshit", if you genuinely believe that people can go fuck themselves with their emotions, that is all legit.
But don't try this skinhead bullshit tactic like deflection, didn't Rage teach you that?
And didn't I tell you that anecdotal evidence is worth fuckall?
Since you were too ignorant to even Google-definition it (how stupid can you possibly be?) I will explain what it means:
"I met a guy who - "
"Once, a woman told me that - "
"I saw it with my own eyes!"
"Here, an interview with a Jew who agrees with Hitler - "
^ anecdotal evidence = not worth shit. That one black guy won't un-do the thousands of blacks who disagree with him.
"Yes he will! He neutralizes them with his ethnicness!"
No he doesn't...
in fact, in all of the "business of knowledge", the fewer sources, the more unreliable the source. But many people, especially idiots, are tempted to believe the opposite - that ONE person is more likely to hold "The hidden ultimate secret", while everyone are misled sheep.
Does that seem like something you agree with?