HILLARY OR RAND?

[sg1008]

lol...

[odeon]

Pretty much a no-brainer from where I stand, but I can see how one might see it as a choice between a rock and a hard place.

[sg1008]

its really tiring. i wish we didn't have to have elections every 4 years.

maybe we'd be more careful about choosing leaders if we had to keep them longer...

[Yuri Bezmenov]

Pretty much a no-brainer from where I stand, but I can see how one might see it as a choice between a rock and a hard place.

Didn't know you were a Rand Paul fan.     

[Arya Quinn]

It's obvious who to vote for in Norn Iron as you have two parties and a few independent candidates in amongst piles and piles and piles (ect) of bigots.

Hilary supports Autism $peaks and is a "good friend to Israel" meaning she's a fan of genocide and hates autistic people  . Two big turn offs for me but at least she's still alive, whereas Paul Rand died nearly 19 years ago:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Rand

So America, you're voting for a bitch or a dead person. Which is it going to be? 

[Parts]

In the end it will make little difference

[Icequeen]

I'll probably vote for the original ice queen.

What the hell, she was already running shit when her husband was in office, you can't tell me he was doing it alone or we probably would have all been able to kiss our collective asses goodbye...he wasn't the brightest crayon in the box, someone had to been helping on the sidelines and you can't tell me it was Gore.

[Jack]

I'll probably vote for the original ice queen.

What the hell, she was already running shit when her husband was in office, you can't tell me he was doing it alone or we probably would have all been able to kiss our collective asses goodbye...he wasn't the brightest crayon in the box, someone had to been helping on the sidelines and you can't tell me it was Gore.

Clinton was considered a success because of the country's financial success during his term. Have always figured any president during those years would have been considered a good president because it was during the internet boom.

[MLA]

That helped.

I'm personally no fan.  DADT and the deregulation of Wall Street.

[odeon]

Pretty much a no-brainer from where I stand, but I can see how one might see it as a choice between a rock and a hard place.

Didn't know you were a Rand Paul fan.     

What gave it away?

[Yuri Bezmenov]

Pretty much a no-brainer from where I stand, but I can see how one might see it as a choice between a rock and a hard place.

Didn't know you were a Rand Paul fan.     

What gave it away?

Well, who in their right mind could be a fan of Hillary?? 

[Hannah]

Pretty much a no-brainer from where I stand, but I can see how one might see it as a choice between a rock and a hard place.

Didn't know you were a Rand Paul fan.     

What gave it away?

Well, who in their right mind could be a fan of Hillary??

That is a good point, she bats no eye lashes at not sending for help during the Benghazi disaster when she was in charge...the emails are in the cloud somewhere all one has to do is retrieve them, which shouldn't be too hard...I personally don't want her as a leader because she has no regard for anyone but herself honestly she's cold, she's unfeeling and frankly I would not want to be in her shoes when what has gone around comes her way...

[sg1008]

Pretty much a no-brainer from where I stand, but I can see how one might see it as a choice between a rock and a hard place.

Didn't know you were a Rand Paul fan.     

What gave it away?

Well, who in their right mind could be a fan of Hillary??

That is a good point, she bats no eye lashes at not sending for help during the Benghazi disaster when she was in charge...the emails are in the cloud somewhere all one has to do is retrieve them, which shouldn't be too hard...I personally don't want her as a leader because she has no regard for anyone but herself honestly she's cold, she's unfeeling and frankly I would not want to be in her shoes when what has gone around comes her way...

Actually, as it turns out, the whole benghazi thing was an error on part of the media. there was no foul play. when the report came out confirming that, the news "forgot" to cover it.

[Yuri Bezmenov]

Actually, as it turns out, the whole benghazi thing was an error on part of the media. there was no foul play. when the report came out confirming that, the news "forgot" to cover it.

Bullshit! The report blamed the State Department for failing to increase security and intelligence agencies for failing to share information.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/senate-report-attack-on-us-compound-in-benghazi-could-have-been-prevented/2014/01/15/5e197224-7de9-11e3-95c6-0a7aa80874bc_story.html

[sg1008]

Actually, as it turns out, the whole benghazi thing was an error on part of the media. there was no foul play. when the report came out confirming that, the news "forgot" to cover it.

Bullshit! The report blamed the State Department for failing to increase security and intelligence agencies for failing to share information.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/senate-report-attack-on-us-compound-in-benghazi-could-have-been-prevented/2014/01/15/5e197224-7de9-11e3-95c6-0a7aa80874bc_story.html

Thats an outdated article. The republican-led report that came out later that year (november) debunks a lot of accusations: http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/21/politics/benghazi-attack-report/

And like I mentioned, it has barely been reported.