The op was meant to spark debate. The webmaster at best gore is a tool, but I did feel he had a point in this article. His rant on Amanda Todd angered me. He was projecting himself onto her.
Well, I've resisted joining in the debate. That obscene photo-montage is too prejudicial. Any debate sparked by that will be biased from the outset.
I tried it out on a friend of mine, out of curiosity. Sure enough, he looked at that image, then went straight into a diatribe about immigration, without pausing for a second to consider it's validity. (Yes, I
was really disappointed in my friend. I didn't think he was
that easily manipulated)
It's an interesting discussion, but, sorry, I'm not biting that bait. I'll discuss the supposed implications when they arise in some other context.
