THAT's your reply? That, in your opinion, the Swedish media and politicians are dishonest, and therefore it follows that....?
Pwned.
OK, this is NOT a personal attack, it's just the only conclusion I can draw: You must either be much more AS than I am and simply unable to look through the lies or, like the NTs, living on wishful thinking. In Norway and Denmark there is a free debate whether this multicultural experiment should continue or not. In Sweden the debate is practically forbidden among "decent" political parties. What kind of a democracy is that? Didn't that hypocrite Lars Leijonborg treat his Danish colleague Pia Kjersgaard, and, subsequently, a great part of the Danish people, her voters, like an idiot, when he met her in a "debate" a couple of years ago? He showed openly that he didn't respect democracy and the will of our neighbour people, the Danes. That's the attitude of Swedish politicians and the reason they cannot be trusted one wit.
I notice that you're still not actually replying to anything I said. All I can see is the vain hope of new conjecture covering the old one.
Pwned.
What should I reply to? You seem unable even to look through the most blatant lies and cover-ups.
If you want to argue about this subject or any other, the basic idea is to offer something substantial, instead of conjecture, statistics for a neighbouring country, more conjecture, etc, etc, etc.
I gave you a list of Muslims protesting, you chose to ignore it and continue spreading your hate and your lies, I asked you to produce
evidence of your theory on the ratio of foreigners/Swedes in the national media, you mentioned an unnamed newspaper with an unidentifiable article and an unidentified kindergarten class with unidentifiable demographics and told us to count any foreign-looking folks we can spot, you keep on telling us how you will be jailed if you speak your mind in public but resort to the lame "no-one is interested anyway" when confronted, etc.
Lies and conjecture. Do I need to go on?
Pwned.