Saw autistic woman on the street twice, approach?

[神]

  I have an impulsive biological reaction of DISGUST, yes, to someone who has posted that his 12-year-old half-sister
   is  "a female pheromone bomb,"  and that  "luckily"  he is not around her often.  Maybe some of that creepy vibe is
   coming across when you proposition all these women from whom you feel ENTITLED to a kind and tactful refusal.

And if you put that into the context of the logic of my argument (instead of utilizing the incoherent, irrational ruleset I criticized), how does that make any sense at all?

[TheoK]

I think DFGL will be a good little boy after Miss Mariana has given him his leche 

["couldbecousin"]

  I have an impulsive biological reaction of DISGUST, yes, to someone who has posted that his 12-year-old half-sister
   is  "a female pheromone bomb,"  and that  "luckily"  he is not around her often.  Maybe some of that creepy vibe is
   coming across when you proposition all these women from whom you feel ENTITLED to a kind and tactful refusal.

And if you put that into the context of the logic of my argument (instead of utilizing the incoherent, irrational ruleset I criticized), how does that make any sense at all?

   It makes sense because you are not a dog, and your expressions of your horniness are voluntary, unlike the tics of Tourette's.
   As for the ruleset being  "incoherent"  and  "irrational,"  too bad.  If you want women to have sex with you, you'd better
   understand why your blunt demands are not working, and find a way to make yourself more palatable.

['andersom']

  I have an impulsive biological reaction of DISGUST, yes, to someone who has posted that his 12-year-old half-sister
   is  "a female pheromone bomb,"  and that  "luckily"  he is not around her often.  Maybe some of that creepy vibe is
   coming across when you proposition all these women from whom you feel ENTITLED to a kind and tactful refusal.

And if you put that into the context of the logic of my argument (instead of utilizing the incoherent, irrational ruleset I criticized), how does that make any sense at all?

The logic of your thread was gone, the moment you posted a link to porn with a post about wanting to approach a hand clapping gir, accompanied by her mother. Your associations have tainted all possible logic. Your history of only talking about sex tainted it even more. But, even if this had been your first post on I2, the combination the link and the post blew the logic out of the proverbial window.

[神]

Just entirely irrational, I can't argue against so much logical fallacies and avoidance of addressing what I said. What has the porn link to do with anything, despite that there is a guy in it who looks similar to me? The answer is: nothing. I am adult, I watch porn, entirely normal. There is nothing whatsoever here that would make any logic disappear. It is just stupid bias, sorry.


My only hope is that Pyraxis will respond.

['andersom']

Just entirely irrational, I can't argue against so much logical fallacies and avoidance of addressing what I said. What has the porn link to do with anything, despite that there is a guy in it who looks similar to me? The answer is: nothing. I am adult, I watch porn, entirely normal. There is nothing whatsoever here that would make any logic disappear. It is just stupid bias, sorry.


My only hope is that Pyraxis will respond.

Minds work with association. Also for most spazzes on this board.

[神]

It makes sense because you are not a dog, and your expressions of your horniness are voluntary, unlike the tics of Tourette's.
   As for the ruleset being  "incoherent"  and  "irrational,"  too bad.  If you want women to have sex with you, you'd better
   understand why your blunt demands are not working, and find a way to make yourself more palatable.

What you said makes sense if you assume that it makes any sense to be dishonest about and concealing your feelings, given current social norms, but not if the premise is that people are open and understanding towards each other, just like with other topics, and that the social norms are misfit to that. Which is basically the core issue I raised, what the argument you referred to was based upon, and which you entirely ignored ...

['andersom']

My only hope is that Pyraxis will respond.

Her ask away thread seems to give away that you do not respect her boundaries.

[神]

Minds work with association. Also for most spazzes on this board.

Sorry, but to be insulting here: I don't assume that you are all fucking retards who's comprehension doesn't go beyond "autistic girl + BDSM fisting porn" = "autistic girl rape".

[神]

My only hope is that Pyraxis will respond.

Her ask away thread seems to give away that you do not respect her boundaries.

Yes, because I can't help my feelings . I cannot understand her reaction. There was another woman I was obsessed about and I wrote her about it. She was the only one who ever responded to and reasonably addressed it, after which I sufficiently understood her rationale and thus could emotionally react appropriately.

["couldbecousin"]

It makes sense because you are not a dog, and your expressions of your horniness are voluntary, unlike the tics of Tourette's.
   As for the ruleset being  "incoherent"  and  "irrational,"  too bad.  If you want women to have sex with you, you'd better
   understand why your blunt demands are not working, and find a way to make yourself more palatable.

What you said makes sense if you assume that it makes any sense to be dishonest about and concealing your feelings, given current social norms, but not if the premise is that people are open and understanding towards each other, just like with other topics, and that the social norms are misfit to that. Which is basically the core issue I raised and which you entirely ignored ...

   Given the lack of success you have had with women by bluntly propositioning them,
   it would make sense for you to take their reactions into consideration and learn to conceal your erection until you've
   known them awhile, talking about things other than your erection.  You know, get to know them as whole people,
   and not just as pheromone bombs and receptacles for your dick.  That kind of patience and maturity might make
   you more likely to win women over.  But maybe you'd rather just rant all day about how irrational women are and
   how wrong the social norms are.  How's that working out for you? 

[神]

   Given the lack of success you have had with women by bluntly propositioning them,
   it would make sense for you to take their reactions into consideration and learn to conceal your erection until you've
   known them awhile, talking about things other than your erection.  You know, get to know them as whole people,
   and not just as pheromone bombs and receptacles for your dick.  That kind of patience and maturity might make
   you more likely to win women over.  But maybe you'd rather just rant all day about how irrational women are and
   how wrong the social norms are.  How's that working out for you? 

It only gives me better knowledge instead of immediate emotional gains. Which is partly why I still have the compulsions I have.

Making sense of the world > emotional profit

Also here, another misinterpretative statement: Sexual interest and everything else is not mutually exclusive, which has been extremely clear if you look at the diagram. It is just something that always occurs, and doesn't really determine any immediate actions, nor does it constitute real interest by itself. I have not PMed Pyraxis about sex and cocks and that is not what I do.

['andersom']

My only hope is that Pyraxis will respond.

Her ask away thread seems to give away that you do not respect her boundaries.

Yes, because I can't help my feelings . I cannot understand her reaction. There was another woman I was obsessed about and I wrote her about it. She was the only one who ever responded to and reasonably addressed it, after which I sufficiently understood her rationale and thus could emotionally react appropriately.

What I have seen of Py, she is very clear in her reactions. If her reaction is to ask you to stop pm-ing, I can not see what is not to be understood about that.

You begging for punishment after that is as if you think you are now in a kind of sm relation with her.

What was the point of apologizing for PM's if you're going to keep sending them? I'm pissed the fuck off. Why should I take anything you say seriously if you can't stand by your words?

I was being emotional again . I am sorry. I think I need punishment or else I won't learn.

["couldbecousin"]

   Given the lack of success you have had with women by bluntly propositioning them,
   it would make sense for you to take their reactions into consideration and learn to conceal your erection until you've
   known them awhile, talking about things other than your erection.  You know, get to know them as whole people,
   and not just as pheromone bombs and receptacles for your dick.  That kind of patience and maturity might make
   you more likely to win women over.  But maybe you'd rather just rant all day about how irrational women are and
   how wrong the social norms are.  How's that working out for you? 

It only gives me better knowledge instead of immediate emotional gains. Which is partly why I still have the compulsions I have.

Making sense of the world > emotional profit

  Then why complain?  Continue to creep women out with pushy sexual overtures, continue to be rejected,
   continue to feel sorry for yourself and to rage against social norms.  Maybe you're really happier this way.   

[神]

What I have seen of Py, she is very clear in her reactions. If her reaction is to ask you to stop pm-ing, I can not see what is not to be understood about that.

You begging for punishment after that is as if you think you are now in a kind of sm relation with her.

She said it is annoying that I spam her with PMs. But I do not understand why she doesn't respond. So I thought maybe I said the wrong things or it were the wrong topics.

Also it is true that the only alternative to a complete rational understanding of the whole social aspect on my part is operand conditioning. Maybe she would like that? How do you know she doesn't?


She has never been clear about that. Real sadism doesn't really require intimacy or relationships, just targets. It is socially entirely different.