RAGEBELOUVE!!!

[RageBeoulve]

-_- Wow... this truly is the autistic 4chan.

Shut the fuck up, nigger.

[odeon]

Rage, cut the crap with the walls of text and images.

You might hate it, but I got rid of the guy in under an hour.

No you didn't. He was banned. You were feeding him and he would have continued because it's what he wanted.

[Genesis]

-_- Wow... this truly is the autistic 4chan.

Shut the fuck up, nigger.

Uh.... I'm white?

[RageBeoulve]

Rage, cut the crap with the walls of text and images.

You might hate it, but I got rid of the guy in under an hour.

No you didn't. He was banned. You were feeding him and he would have continued because it's what he wanted.

Odeon. I took control of the situation away from him and forced him to ditch his persona to maintain the center of attention. I did this because I knew it was marx and he was underage. HE was banned that fast because I knew what I was doing.

[renaeden]

All it seemed to me was that two people were being really annoying.

[Al Swearegen]

Rage, cut the crap with the walls of text and images.

You might hate it, but I got rid of the guy in under an hour.

No you didn't. He was banned. You were feeding him and he would have continued because it's what he wanted.

Odeon. I took control of the situation away from him and forced him to ditch his persona to maintain the center of attention. I did this because I knew it was marx and he was underage. HE was banned that fast because I knew what I was doing.

Sorry Rage but you were doing no more or less than anyone else.

He posted crap you posted crap back at him, I did, others did, Your crap contained spam others didn't. I petitioned Parts to do away with him. He got done away with. McJagger removed the spam. You played a part but were not head of the pack or the sole cause or the shining light or anything else. You were just another participants. It was good there were  lot of us.

I know you like to take responsibility for all the positive stuff that comes out of interactions but you often disregard the others that participated in the effort or contributed to the result and frame it in the "I caused this". It is a bit unfair and dishonest, dude. It is not to disregard your part in things If you are the most vocal of even half a dozen voices then it is not to say you are the only voice or even that you are only 1/6th of the result but taking credit for the whole of the result is bullshit.

When you say "You see what I did!" and have the recipient saying "Well yeah because I was there too doing the same thing" Something is wrong.

[RageBeoulve]

Rage, cut the crap with the walls of text and images.

You might hate it, but I got rid of the guy in under an hour.

No you didn't. He was banned. You were feeding him and he would have continued because it's what he wanted.

Odeon. I took control of the situation away from him and forced him to ditch his persona to maintain the center of attention. I did this because I knew it was marx and he was underage. HE was banned that fast because I knew what I was doing.

Sorry Rage but you were doing no more or less than anyone else.

He posted crap you posted crap back at him, I did, others did, Your crap contained spam others didn't. I petitioned Parts to do away with him. He got done away with. McJagger removed the spam. You played a part but were not head of the pack or the sole cause or the shining light or anything else. You were just another participants. It was good there were  lot of us.

I know you like to take responsibility for all the positive stuff that comes out of interactions but you often disregard the others that participated in the effort or contributed to the result and frame it in the "I caused this". It is a bit unfair and dishonest, dude. It is not to disregard your part in things If you are the most vocal of even half a dozen voices then it is not to say you are the only voice or even that you are only 1/6th of the result but taking credit for the whole of the result is bullshit.

When you say "You see what I did!" and have the recipient saying "Well yeah because I was there too doing the same thing" Something is wrong.

It would have lasted much longer if I hadn't stolen control of the situation from him dude. Straight up. I know how trolls think, and I know what they're after. He was going for attention, and he wasn't getting it. This is why he revealed who he was and resorted to spam.

[RageBeoulve]

-_- Wow... this truly is the autistic 4chan.

Shut the fuck up, nigger.

Uh.... I'm white?

So?

[Al Swearegen]

Rage, cut the crap with the walls of text and images.

You might hate it, but I got rid of the guy in under an hour.

No you didn't. He was banned. You were feeding him and he would have continued because it's what he wanted.

Odeon. I took control of the situation away from him and forced him to ditch his persona to maintain the center of attention. I did this because I knew it was marx and he was underage. HE was banned that fast because I knew what I was doing.

Sorry Rage but you were doing no more or less than anyone else.

He posted crap you posted crap back at him, I did, others did, Your crap contained spam others didn't. I petitioned Parts to do away with him. He got done away with. McJagger removed the spam. You played a part but were not head of the pack or the sole cause or the shining light or anything else. You were just another participants. It was good there were  lot of us.

I know you like to take responsibility for all the positive stuff that comes out of interactions but you often disregard the others that participated in the effort or contributed to the result and frame it in the "I caused this". It is a bit unfair and dishonest, dude. It is not to disregard your part in things If you are the most vocal of even half a dozen voices then it is not to say you are the only voice or even that you are only 1/6th of the result but taking credit for the whole of the result is bullshit.

When you say "You see what I did!" and have the recipient saying "Well yeah because I was there too doing the same thing" Something is wrong.

It would have lasted much longer if I hadn't stolen control of the situation from him dude. Straight up. I know how trolls think, and I know what they're after. He was going for attention, and he wasn't getting it. This is why he revealed who he was and resorted to spam.

So do I and so do many people. Mate, you are are one of my mates on here, but really mate you taking full credit for everything that you see and do and every argument that you come out trumps on. Quite often threads are showing positions that are exposed not n the wisdom of Rage but the wisdom of many people. Again it does not say that you are wrong in your assertions but if two or three people are agreeing with your assertions or generally supporting your assertions, then saying "See this was all a result of my actions and I am the sole contributor" is a bit much dude.

[odeon]

Rage, cut the crap with the walls of text and images.

You might hate it, but I got rid of the guy in under an hour.

No you didn't. He was banned. You were feeding him and he would have continued because it's what he wanted.

Odeon. I took control of the situation away from him and forced him to ditch his persona to maintain the center of attention. I did this because I knew it was marx and he was underage. HE was banned that fast because I knew what I was doing.

Marx is not underage, afaik.

And no, we'll have to disagree on this. Instead of one annoying poster, there were two.

[odeon]

Rage, cut the crap with the walls of text and images.

You might hate it, but I got rid of the guy in under an hour.

No you didn't. He was banned. You were feeding him and he would have continued because it's what he wanted.

Odeon. I took control of the situation away from him and forced him to ditch his persona to maintain the center of attention. I did this because I knew it was marx and he was underage. HE was banned that fast because I knew what I was doing.

Sorry Rage but you were doing no more or less than anyone else.

He posted crap you posted crap back at him, I did, others did, Your crap contained spam others didn't. I petitioned Parts to do away with him. He got done away with. McJagger removed the spam. You played a part but were not head of the pack or the sole cause or the shining light or anything else. You were just another participants. It was good there were  lot of us.

I know you like to take responsibility for all the positive stuff that comes out of interactions but you often disregard the others that participated in the effort or contributed to the result and frame it in the "I caused this". It is a bit unfair and dishonest, dude. It is not to disregard your part in things If you are the most vocal of even half a dozen voices then it is not to say you are the only voice or even that you are only 1/6th of the result but taking credit for the whole of the result is bullshit.

When you say "You see what I did!" and have the recipient saying "Well yeah because I was there too doing the same thing" Something is wrong.

It would have lasted much longer if I hadn't stolen control of the situation from him dude. Straight up. I know how trolls think, and I know what they're after. He was going for attention, and he wasn't getting it. This is why he revealed who he was and resorted to spam.

Er, no. Just no. He got all the attention he wanted, from you and from several others. Congrats, though. Well done feeding him.

[RageBeoulve]

Rage, cut the crap with the walls of text and images.

You might hate it, but I got rid of the guy in under an hour.

No you didn't. He was banned. You were feeding him and he would have continued because it's what he wanted.

Odeon. I took control of the situation away from him and forced him to ditch his persona to maintain the center of attention. I did this because I knew it was marx and he was underage. HE was banned that fast because I knew what I was doing.

Sorry Rage but you were doing no more or less than anyone else.

He posted crap you posted crap back at him, I did, others did, Your crap contained spam others didn't. I petitioned Parts to do away with him. He got done away with. McJagger removed the spam. You played a part but were not head of the pack or the sole cause or the shining light or anything else. You were just another participants. It was good there were  lot of us.

I know you like to take responsibility for all the positive stuff that comes out of interactions but you often disregard the others that participated in the effort or contributed to the result and frame it in the "I caused this". It is a bit unfair and dishonest, dude. It is not to disregard your part in things If you are the most vocal of even half a dozen voices then it is not to say you are the only voice or even that you are only 1/6th of the result but taking credit for the whole of the result is bullshit.

When you say "You see what I did!" and have the recipient saying "Well yeah because I was there too doing the same thing" Something is wrong.

It would have lasted much longer if I hadn't stolen control of the situation from him dude. Straight up. I know how trolls think, and I know what they're after. He was going for attention, and he wasn't getting it. This is why he revealed who he was and resorted to spam.

So do I and so do many people. Mate, you are are one of my mates on here, but really mate you taking full credit for everything that you see and do and every argument that you come out trumps on. Quite often threads are showing positions that are exposed not n the wisdom of Rage but the wisdom of many people. Again it does not say that you are wrong in your assertions but if two or three people are agreeing with your assertions or generally supporting your assertions, then saying "See this was all a result of my actions and I am the sole contributor" is a bit much dude.

You know it was all me, dude. I wake up in the morning and piss excellence. I'm a winner. 

[Al Swearegen]

Rage, cut the crap with the walls of text and images.

You might hate it, but I got rid of the guy in under an hour.

No you didn't. He was banned. You were feeding him and he would have continued because it's what he wanted.

Odeon. I took control of the situation away from him and forced him to ditch his persona to maintain the center of attention. I did this because I knew it was marx and he was underage. HE was banned that fast because I knew what I was doing.

Sorry Rage but you were doing no more or less than anyone else.

He posted crap you posted crap back at him, I did, others did, Your crap contained spam others didn't. I petitioned Parts to do away with him. He got done away with. McJagger removed the spam. You played a part but were not head of the pack or the sole cause or the shining light or anything else. You were just another participants. It was good there were  lot of us.

I know you like to take responsibility for all the positive stuff that comes out of interactions but you often disregard the others that participated in the effort or contributed to the result and frame it in the "I caused this". It is a bit unfair and dishonest, dude. It is not to disregard your part in things If you are the most vocal of even half a dozen voices then it is not to say you are the only voice or even that you are only 1/6th of the result but taking credit for the whole of the result is bullshit.

When you say "You see what I did!" and have the recipient saying "Well yeah because I was there too doing the same thing" Something is wrong.

It would have lasted much longer if I hadn't stolen control of the situation from him dude. Straight up. I know how trolls think, and I know what they're after. He was going for attention, and he wasn't getting it. This is why he revealed who he was and resorted to spam.

So do I and so do many people. Mate, you are are one of my mates on here, but really mate you taking full credit for everything that you see and do and every argument that you come out trumps on. Quite often threads are showing positions that are exposed not n the wisdom of Rage but the wisdom of many people. Again it does not say that you are wrong in your assertions but if two or three people are agreeing with your assertions or generally supporting your assertions, then saying "See this was all a result of my actions and I am the sole contributor" is a bit much dude.

You know it was all me, dude. I wake up in the morning and piss excellence. I'm a winner. 

Yeah we all are winners. You are one of a whole bunch of awesomeness here. Aren't you glad you are part of the crowd?

[RageBeoulve]

I'm the most winnest, because i'm the best. 

[odeon]

I'm bestester than you lot.