What is up with the retarded categorizations on this forum?
I tried to reasonably explain something. Of course that must be categorized as "pseudo-intellectualising" because it conflicts with your own opinion.
And then the categorization of people into being like former members who I don't even know, which are more broadly categorized into socks, idiots, assholes, etc., with all the different an equally insulting nuances, like attention-whoring, asshatting and whatever ridiculous terms you use here frequently.
It is pretty easy to dismiss everything based on simplified stereotypes, except that it doesn't make any real sense at all. I mean, do you even converse outside of this board anymore and listen to how much sense this 'cognition jargon' still makes?
I am new here and my behavior makes if then no 'sense' because my social abilities are pretty crappy and I can't understand people well. Also I have certain compulsions, such as thinking rationally and being too honest. Of course I don't act as inadequate in my immediate social environment as I do here. But that is because I only do the things I know to be absolutely correct socially and act very very socially inhibited, that is never freely or natural like other people. I don't build real personal relationships. It is not healthy and it is part of my social problems, but the alternatives are obviously less functional.
The internet is a place where people are usually pretty aware of the implications of interacting through text messages, being always separated by computers with no real social aspects that aren't received if they don't choose to receive them. You can desist from reading a message, but you cannot not hear what you are told in reality. It is a lot more anonymous, more distant. Basically everything is voluntary. People talk more freely for that reason.
I am a social idiot, because I don't have any real knowledge about the inner mechanics of people, and I am not denying that. But I can think reasonable in the sense of thinking logically and coherent very well. That those two are not the same might be hard to grasp for some, especially for those who never developed a rational understanding of the things that intuitively work for them.
But is this an Asperger's/autism forum, or not? Is that not the primary issue that should be most tolerated here? How can you make the contrary the imperative?