a thread that was trolled badly

[Jack]

I figured out what's wrong with Rage:

I asked you not to antagonize him.

But that's what trolls do.

[Bastet]

I figured out what's wrong with Rage:

I asked you not to antagonize him.

But that's what trolls do.

He wasn't a troll on AFF.

[Jack]

I figured out what's wrong with Rage:

I asked you not to antagonize him.

But that's what trolls do.

He wasn't a troll on AFF.

So? He's one here.

[神]

I asked you not to antagonize him.

I am sorry . He started it .

[Bastet]

I asked you not to antagonize him.

I am sorry . He started it .

He was very patient with you till you asked him for my nudes. That's fucked up.

[神]

I cannot confirm that, although I do not recall at which point I exactly asked for them. I don't see how it is a reason to insult me everywhere I go and misrepresent everything I say in the manner I illustrated in the picture.

Even if it were a reason, what would be the reason for me to not continue the interaction in the manner it is taking place? Given that neither one of us seems to be that much bothered by it that we needed to ignore each other?

[Bastet]

I cannot confirm that, although I do not recall at which point I exactly asked for them. I don't see how it is a reason to insult me everywhere I go and misrepresent everything I say in the manner I illustrated in the picture.

I think he is just creeped out. I wish you'd both stop.

[神]

I will try.

[Al Swearegen]

I cannot confirm that, although I do not recall at which point I exactly asked for them. I don't see how it is a reason to insult me everywhere I go and misrepresent everything I say in the manner I illustrated in the picture.

Even if it were a reason, what would be the reason for me to not continue the interaction in the manner they are taking place?

OK I can perhaps help you here. Only a complete idiot would ask the boyfriend of a girl he knew for nudes and NOT expect that the guy would be upset, creeped out and angry. You would not do that to a stranger in a bar or down the street because you are not that suicidal. Yet you did that here. The fact that you did that here, though you knew better, means you can not use the fallback position of 'I saw nothing wrong with what I did", therefore you did that purposely and for effect and now do not own your choices.
Following me?
Hilarious

[ZEGH8578]

I will try.

You can try to go fuck yourself.

[神]

OK I can perhaps help you here. Only a complete idiot would ask the boyfriend of a girl he knew for nudes and NOT expect that the guy would be upset, creeped out and angry. You would not do that to a stranger in a bar or down the street because you are not that suicidal. Yet you did that here. The fact that you did that here, though you knew better, means you can not use the fallback position of 'I saw nothing wrong with what I did", therefore you did that purposely and for effect and now do not own your choices.
Following me?
Hilarious

No. First, this is the internet and I am spatially separated from DuckFetishGirl by more than 1500km. There is no realistic danger that I would 'steal' Rage's girlfriend or whatever. The entire situation is not the same and incomparable. I have in fact asked for nude and sex pictures of couples and former couples online and they either just said "no", where somewhat shortly annoyed, sometimes they said yes, or they were even the ones making them kind of public within a closed circle. I don't have statistically significant experience with that obviously, like no one has with anything. Also those people were on drugs all the time, but I can't see how that would change anything considering they otherwise were of sound judgement. Realistically speaking, asking doesn't hurt anyone and it doesn't change anything.

Yet you require me to accept and obey to an emotional reaction here, that is entirely beyond the roof of reason and appropriate for circumstances not even remotely plausible here?

That does in fact sound ridiculous to me.

Not to mention that I was not even aware that this was the reason for his behavior.

[Al Swearegen]

OK I can perhaps help you here. Only a complete idiot would ask the boyfriend of a girl he knew for nudes and NOT expect that the guy would be upset, creeped out and angry. You would not do that to a stranger in a bar or down the street because you are not that suicidal. Yet you did that here. The fact that you did that here, though you knew better, means you can not use the fallback position of 'I saw nothing wrong with what I did", therefore you did that purposely and for effect and now do not own your choices.
Following me?
Hilarious

No. First, this is the internet and I am spatially separated from DuckFetishGirl by more than 1500km. There is no realistic danger that I would 'steal' Rage's girlfriend or whatever. The entire situation is not the same and incomparable. I have in fact asked for nude and sex pictures of couples and former couples online and they either just said "no", where somewhat shortly annoyed, sometimes they said yes, or they were even the ones making them kind of public within a closed circle. I don't have statistically significant experience with that obviously, like no one has with anything. Also those people were on drugs all the time, but I can't see how that would change anything considering they otherwise were of sound judgement. Realistically speaking, asking doesn't hurt anyone and it doesn't change anything.

Yet you require me to accept and obey to an emotional reaction here, that is entirely beyond the roof of reason and appropriate for circumstances not even remotely plausible here?

That does in fact sound ridiculous to me.

I do not for a moment imagine that there is the remotest chance you would "steal Rages girlfriend or whatever".

Now this type of pseudo-intellectualising sounds very much like the kind of asshattery that Buttcoffee used to try. He was a loser and intellectual lightweight of cringeworthy stature. I think you would have got on well with him and his emotional attention whoring drug-addled girlfriend, Eris.

So anyway what is your premise here? Oh you have done this kind of thing all the time? Going to randoms and asking them for nude pictures of their girlfriends. Of course you have. I do not think you completely full of shit. Not only this but people getting this kind of request are normally just a little annoyed but often ascend to the request of some complete stranger and I guess invite you in to their place and sit you down for a coffee as one of them scurries off to get these personal images for you.....

As I said you are hilarious. I did not know how you would try to justify your position but it was sillier and more amusing than I thought.

Topping it off with

Yet you require me to accept and obey to an emotional reaction here, that is entirely beyond the roof of reason and appropriate for circumstances not even remotely plausible here?

That does in fact sound ridiculous to me.

Of course it sounds ridiculous to you. 

In the immortal words of Forrest Gump

Stupid is as stupid does.

[神]

What is up with the retarded categorizations on this forum?

I tried to reasonably explain something. Of course that must be categorized as "pseudo-intellectualising" because it conflicts with your own opinion.

And then the categorization of people into being like former members who I don't even know, which are more broadly categorized into socks, idiots, assholes, etc., with all the different an equally insulting nuances, like attention-whoring, asshatting and whatever ridiculous terms you use here frequently.

It is pretty easy to dismiss everything based on simplified stereotypes, except that it doesn't make any real sense at all. I mean, do you even converse outside of this board anymore and listen to how much sense this 'cognition jargon' still makes?

I am new here and my behavior makes if then no 'sense' because my social abilities are pretty crappy and I can't understand people well. Also I have certain compulsions, such as thinking rationally and being too honest. Of course I don't act as inadequate in my immediate social environment as I do here. But that is because I only do the things I know to be absolutely correct socially and act very very socially inhibited, that is never freely or natural like other people. I don't build real personal relationships. It is not healthy and it is part of my social problems, but the alternatives are obviously less functional.

The internet is a place where people are usually pretty aware of the implications of interacting through text messages, being always separated by computers with no real social aspects that aren't received if they don't choose to receive them. You can desist from reading a message, but you cannot not hear what you are told in reality. It is a lot more anonymous, more distant. Basically everything is voluntary. People talk more freely for that reason.

I am a social idiot, because I don't have any real knowledge about the inner mechanics of people, and I am not denying that. But I can think reasonable in the sense of thinking logically and coherent very well. That those two are not the same might be hard to grasp for some, especially for those who never developed a rational understanding of the things that intuitively work for them.


But is this an Asperger's/autism forum, or not? Is that not the primary issue that should be most tolerated here? How can you make the contrary the imperative?

[Al Swearegen]

What is up with the retarded categorizations on this forum?

I tried to reasonably explain something. Of course that must be categorized as "pseudo-intellectualising" because it conflicts with your own opinion.

And then the categorization of people into being like former members who I don't even know, which are more broadly categorized into socks, idiots, assholes, etc., with all the different an equally insulting nuances, like attention-whoring, asshatting and whatever ridiculous terms you use here frequently.

It is pretty easy to dismiss everything based on simplified stereotypes, except that it doesn't make any real sense at all. I mean, do you even converse outside of this board anymore and listen to how much sense this 'cognition jargon' still makes?

I am new here and my behavior makes if then no 'sense' because my social abilities are pretty crappy and I can't understand people well. Also I have certain compulsions, such as thinking rationally and being too honest. Of course I don't act as inadequate in my immediate social environment as I do here. But that is because I only do the things I know to be absolutely correct socially and act very very socially inhibited, that is never freely or natural like other people. I don't build real personal relationships. It is not healthy and it is part of my social problems, but the alternatives are obviously less functional.

The internet is a place where people are usually pretty aware of the implications of interacting through text messages, being always separated by computers with no real social aspects that aren't received if they don't choose to receive them. You can desist from reading a message, but you cannot not hear what you are told in reality. It is a lot more anonymous, more distant. Basically everything is voluntary. People talk more freely for that reason.

I am a social idiot, because I don't have any real knowledge about the inner mechanics of people, and I am not denying that. But I can think reasonable in the sense of thinking logically and coherent very well. That those two are not the same might be hard to grasp for some, especially for those who never developed a rational understanding of the things that intuitively work for them.


But is this an Asperger's/autism forum, or not? Is that not the primary issue that should be most tolerated here? How can you make the contrary the imperative?

Since the Dawn of Time, Man has sought to understand and appreciate the world.

Fast-forward.......this kind of bullshit you spout, we have seen before. It is not new and you are not special or unique or different to this kind of discourse.
We categorise because it is the same. We say you post like Buttcoffee because you post like Buttcoffee. We call it pseudo-intellectualising because it is bereft of actual intellect and does a poor imitation of putting across your ideas.
We humour you and for that you should be pleased. You should laugh in joy as we laugh at your fail.
We are not against you. We like humour as much as the next guy. In fact as the next guy appears to be you, probably more.

[ZEGH8578]

I want to die

Go fuck yourself.