Oh now what the fuck. I come back, read back a bit, and what do I see? Dodging, attempts to derail, etc. What a bunch of pussies.
Odeon-
Innocent, like a teenager returning home late. Accidents involving guns in the home are quite common.
Are you familiar with the statistics on that, sir? Accidental shootings are far less common than criminals murdering people with guns. Mostly black on black crime, too. Passing laws will stop that, right? 
Did you need help finding this information? I would be glad to do that.
It's such a relief that accidental shootings do not dominate the statistics.
But incidentally, where did I claim they did?
I won't feed your circle jerk, then. I bet that you'd dismiss every example I'd produce as someone not giving "110%". What's the bloody point?
I do not see the connection with a cop not performing his duties and you debating gun ownership. Please explain.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem, Rage? Put the above in context and explain to me what you didn't understand. If you catch me in the right mood I may attempt to rephrase for your benefit.
If you actually read the thread instead of giving in to the knee-jerk, you will note that this thread is yet another example of the usual I2 gun law debate, which gives it a context in which both our replies should be read.
It does indeed. I've noticed people have a habit of skimming my posts. Maybe they don't like what I have to say? And they think they can "boycott" those things? Because of bias and feels?
The thread is not titled "the things I actually need to overthrow the government".
I take great relish in saying I didn't start this little mess, Odeon. Adam did.
No, he didn't. Adam commented on an existing mess. You opposed his views.
I've said time and again that you need a lot more than guns if you want to realistically overthrow a corrupt government, which is the raison d'etre for the 2d amendment and what you people will frequently refer to when wanting to keep your guns, whatever the cost.
I believe I made three posts detailing why guns are the backbone of an armed revolt. Very detailed posts. Of course much more is required than guns, but without guns? Impossible, and you know it, good sir. Please fully read my posts if you'd like to debate me.
Then why are you bringing it up in a thread discussing questionable ideas in Iowa?
The only reason this whole overthrowing the government idiocy came up is because 'mericans will always bring up the 2d amendment if somebody questions the "right" to carry a gun.
Didn't there use to be text in your constitution about people held for labour in one state not be allowed to be freed by the laws of another? You overcame that little problem in the constitution, eventually. Gives me some hope that you might eventually see that carrying a weapon should not be a right, no matter what.
It amuses me that carrying a gun should be regarded as a right when equal health care to all is not.
