Ahh I see. In my experience, o'er here they are more commonly referred to as supremacists, nationalists, and extremists...probably because they don't generally seem to have consistent fundamentals ('else they could be reasoned with on things such as the environment, and socialist ideas, and there could even be some type of unity established with their interests in mind. of course some things would be summarily rejected-such as segregation, but this would be reasonable because if one doesn't understand survival and filial love, one is seriously missing a great human perspective). There is no reason why they can't self-segregate, like the Amish.
...Well, on second thought, I've heard tell that one fundamental of nationalists is the revival of the conquering Roman Empire (and its glory), which seems so ironic and anti-folk culture that I can't even believe it. But its what the neo-nationalist ''pundits' seem to perpetuate. I really just wish they would actually learn more about folk cultures and celebrate that instead of pursuing some misguided adoration of the genocidal ancient Roman empire. They ought to read Tacitus and see what the Romans did to actual European cultures in order to conquer them. *sigh. Perhaps its too much to ask. :/
what in the world are fundies?
Fundamentalists.
"Is she gone yet?"