If I got rid of everything that didn't "spark joy"...I'd be on the side of the road with the cat and my coffee maker.
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: odeon on February 06, 2012, 02:20:14 PMHe didn't put any motives behind it, did he? Sounds to me you did some projecting.Why do you routinely answer for others?
He didn't put any motives behind it, did he? Sounds to me you did some projecting.
Thoughts? Emily?
Quote from: Al Swearengen on February 07, 2012, 08:51:05 AMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 07, 2012, 08:43:56 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 07, 2012, 04:30:37 AMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:42:22 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:40:32 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:38:34 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:28:52 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:26:23 PMQuote from: Squidusa on February 06, 2012, 03:50:05 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.You lack comprehension, are not a part of the culture and are pretty new so who really cares what you think?You do.I don't , but humour me and tell me why you think so.By your response.
Quote from: Émile Armand on February 07, 2012, 08:43:56 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 07, 2012, 04:30:37 AMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:42:22 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:40:32 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:38:34 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:28:52 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:26:23 PMQuote from: Squidusa on February 06, 2012, 03:50:05 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.You lack comprehension, are not a part of the culture and are pretty new so who really cares what you think?You do.I don't , but humour me and tell me why you think so.
Quote from: Al Swearengen on February 07, 2012, 04:30:37 AMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:42:22 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:40:32 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:38:34 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:28:52 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:26:23 PMQuote from: Squidusa on February 06, 2012, 03:50:05 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.You lack comprehension, are not a part of the culture and are pretty new so who really cares what you think?You do.
Quote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:42:22 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:40:32 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:38:34 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:28:52 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:26:23 PMQuote from: Squidusa on February 06, 2012, 03:50:05 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.You lack comprehension, are not a part of the culture and are pretty new so who really cares what you think?
Quote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:40:32 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:38:34 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:28:52 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:26:23 PMQuote from: Squidusa on February 06, 2012, 03:50:05 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.
Quote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:38:34 PMQuote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:28:52 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:26:23 PMQuote from: Squidusa on February 06, 2012, 03:50:05 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"
Quote from: Ceilidh on February 06, 2012, 03:28:52 PMQuote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:26:23 PMQuote from: Squidusa on February 06, 2012, 03:50:05 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.
Quote from: Émile Armand on February 06, 2012, 03:26:23 PMQuote from: Squidusa on February 06, 2012, 03:50:05 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.
Quote from: Squidusa on February 06, 2012, 03:50:05 AMQuote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.
Quote from: Al Swearengen on February 06, 2012, 03:31:39 AMQuote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.
Quote from: Adam on February 06, 2012, 03:26:39 AModeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak realllyMost people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style. But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee? Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?
odeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak reallly
"I think the guy who posts as Al Swearengen, who doesn't know me,who has not, never will have anything to do with me IRL, who has no real connection to me or assessment of what I do or don't do as a person and no idea of my values, cares for what I write because...."
You'll never self-actualize the subconscious canopy of stardust with that attitude.
Quote from: Al Swearengen on February 07, 2012, 05:07:42 PM"I think the guy who posts as Al Swearengen, who doesn't know me,who has not, never will have anything to do with me IRL, who has no real connection to me or assessment of what I do or don't do as a person and no idea of my values, cares for what I write because...."Gaaaaaaahhhhhh quote nest
As I was washing laundry this whoop-de-do with Emily crossed my mind. Don't know why, but General Razorbeard came to mind. Anyone else see similarities?
