Hello Everyone

[Émile Armand]

I dont know if I still need to answer this.

Clearly what I said was right, but I cant back it up without posting stuff that I shouldnt.

What do you mean post "stuff that I shouldnt"? Is there some sort of boundary preventing you from posting certain things?

[Émile Armand]

He didn't put any motives behind it, did he? Sounds to me you did some projecting.

Why do you routinely answer for others?

[Émile Armand]

odeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak reallly

Most people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style.
But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee?
Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440

Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.

How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.

Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.

I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.

[Kaelyrhn]

odeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak reallly

Most people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style.
But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee?
Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440

Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.

How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.

Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.

I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.

I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"

[Émile Armand]

odeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak reallly

Most people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style.
But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee?
Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440

Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.

How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.

Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.

I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.

I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"

There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.

[Al Swearegen]

odeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak reallly

Most people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style.
But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee?
Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440

Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.

How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.

Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.

I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.

I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"

There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.

You lack comprehension, are not a part of the culture and are pretty new so who really cares what you think?

[Adam]

we have... culture?

[Kaelyrhn]

we have... culture?

Well...a culture. All communities do.

[Adam]

i was joking

[Kaelyrhn]

i was joking

I is fail

[Émile Armand]

odeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak reallly

Most people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style.
But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee?
Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440

Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.

How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.

Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.

I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.

I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"

There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.

You lack comprehension, are not a part of the culture and are pretty new so who really cares what you think?

You do.

[Al Swearegen]

odeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak reallly

Most people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style.
But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee?
Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440

Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.

How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.

Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.

I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.

I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"

There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.

You lack comprehension, are not a part of the culture and are pretty new so who really cares what you think?

You do.

I don't , but humour me and tell me why you think so.

I will start you off to make it easy for you

"I think the guy who posts as Al Swearengen, who doesn't know me,who has not, never will have anything to do with me IRL, who has no real connection to me or assessment of what I do or don't do as a person and no idea of my values, cares for what I write because...."

Will be an interesting read i am sure. I am logging off for the night so you will have plenty of time. Try for insightful. I know you won't get there but it will be funny seeing you try.

['Butterflies']

I dont know if I still need to answer this.

Clearly what I said was right, but I cant back it up without posting stuff that I shouldnt.

What do you mean post "stuff that I shouldnt"? Is there some sort of boundary preventing you from posting certain things?

Yes. But sadly it is secret, and if I tell you, I have to kill you

[Émile Armand]

odeon's made it clear that bc will be banned each time he returns, and most people seem to think that Emile is bc. so I don't think it's such an unsubstantiated claim to mak reallly

Most people that sure. He has that pretty identifiable style.
But who said he WAS Buttcoffee and who said he was getting banned for being Buttcoffee?
Butterflies seemed to draw it like a forgone conclusion. Is that right or am I misreading? "He should not be banned". Seems to suggest people have indicated that he should. Have they and i have missed it? Sounded like she was trying to reprieve him from a fate that was not in question in the first place?

http://www.intensitysquared.com/index.php/topic,19189.msg860440.html#msg860440

Odeon made another post about looking for proof that he is Buttcoffee and when/if he finds it BC is banned.

How come I cannot read that thread? It says I am not allowed to read.

Only for Elders. I used to be one, but then I got stupid. I'm getting better.

I was under the impression there are no boundaries on this site. I must be wrong.

I wouldn't say "no boundaries", but rather "very few boundaries"

There seems to be quite a few boundaries so far.

You lack comprehension, are not a part of the culture and are pretty new so who really cares what you think?

You do.

I don't , but humour me and tell me why you think so.

By your response.

[odeon]

Let's face it, Adam, you will always judge Callaway and Sir Les differently from others, regardless, and every time your motives will be clear.

You are not very hard to read or second-guess.

Isn't that a Circumstantial Ad Hominem?

Shouldn't you be aware of that? You know, seeing as you love fallacies so much?

(and yeah I'm probably conducting a fallacy in this)

 

Er, no. It's a simple statement of fact, one that Adam agreed was true.