Could no longer bite my tongue on this...you know me.

[odeon]

What butthurt? For what reason?

That's obvious. You think Les has left the site. He has blamed me, so you blame me.

Do you even believe this yourself? Honestly?

Moral outrage? Really? Well, if pointing out that what you did was over the top is moral outrage, I can live with that. Beats the alternative.

You had adequately pointed out your opinion 20 pages ago, I think we all get the point.

In other words, you have to try something else since it turned out that the argument didn't work. A bit like your argument about me policing I2 a while back.

I sort of like your lynch mob insinuation. Tells me that you somehow need to reverse the tables; instead of you and the posse it's now me and the lynch mob. Amusing but painfully far off the mark.

Not really. You aren't a lynch mob, just as I wasn't part of a lynch mob on FB. If you read the drama on FB, you'll see that it was no lynching. In fact, I was perfectly civil to her.

That didn't work either, did it? Next.

Just to take one example, are you aware of the fact that Pyraxis and I will usually disagree on mostly everything? That she has been and still is one of my more vocal critics?

Yes, but at the moment her hatred for me is clearly greater than her dislike of you. TBH she doesn't seem to have any idea what really went on anyway.

You really don't have a clue, do you? Hatred? Pyraxis?

[odeon]

Apathy doesn't keep responding to every post.

Apathy isn't contained in purely one thread.

Must be a very active form of apathy.

[Binty]

Apathy doesn't keep responding to every post.

Apathy isn't contained in purely one thread.

Must be a very active form of apathy.

It is if you misconstrue it that way.

[odeon]

Apathy doesn't keep responding to every post.

Apathy isn't contained in purely one thread.

Must be a very active form of apathy.

It is if you misconstrue it that way.

Maybe I just don't buy it.

['Butterflies']

Do you even believe this yourself? Honestly?

Yes. I think your butthurt is immense right now. I can only assume it's because you think Les has left.

You are trying to attack my behaviour, by behaving worse than I have ever done. All whilst preaching from your soapbox that two wrongs don't make a right.
You're just a nasty little hypocrite.

[Binty]

Apathy doesn't keep responding to every post.

Apathy isn't contained in purely one thread.

Must be a very active form of apathy.

It is if you misconstrue it that way.

Maybe I just don't buy it.

Finally, an opinion posed as an opinion and not a fact.  Progress 

[Scrapheap]

TCO was hardly a worthy opponent and causing him another meltdown isn't enough stuff for Flaming 101.

Whether or not TCO was a "worthy opponent" in niether here nor there.

TCO was an antagonistic asshole who went asking for all this shit.

If this incident didn't "cause a meltdown" then something else would've.

As Rosanna Rosanna Danna used to say "If it isn't one thing, it's another. It's always something."

[Scrapheap]

What is more of a concern is this little piece
Pandora made the decision to make poisonous remarks about Binty's relationships and paint Butterflies as some extremely evil person.
Considering that I not only said that TCO made these remarks (from Pandora's account) about Bint, I also PM'ed you the actual quote he wrote from an email to me that said this explicitly, why say this?
You KNOW it is blatantly untrue but you put it out there anyway?
THAT I don't get.

I've made this point before and I'll make it again.

Because Pandora allowed TCO to use her account, then she accepts full responsibility for what was posted.

It was a colossal mistake on her behalf to allow someone else to post in her name.

[odeon]

Do you even believe this yourself? Honestly?

Yes. I think your butthurt is immense right now. I can only assume it's because you think Les has left.

You are trying to attack my behaviour, by behaving worse than I have ever done. All whilst preaching from your soapbox that two wrongs don't make a right.
You're just a nasty little hypocrite.

So, how many innocent people have I attacked as part of this? 

You know what I think? I think you are the butthurt one here. You were called out on your behaviour and your usual shifting doesn't work. You've been exposed and that just gotta hurt.

[odeon]

TCO was hardly a worthy opponent and causing him another meltdown isn't enough stuff for Flaming 101.

Whether or not TCO was a "worthy opponent" in niether here nor there.

TCO was an antagonistic asshole who went asking for all this shit.

If this incident didn't "cause a meltdown" then something else would've.

As Rosanna Rosanna Danna used to say "If it isn't one thing, it's another. It's always something."

TCO did ask for it, yes. But riling him up is easier than stealing candy from a 5-yo and hardly warrants the attention.

[odeon]

What is more of a concern is this little piece
Pandora made the decision to make poisonous remarks about Binty's relationships and paint Butterflies as some extremely evil person.
Considering that I not only said that TCO made these remarks (from Pandora's account) about Bint, I also PM'ed you the actual quote he wrote from an email to me that said this explicitly, why say this?
You KNOW it is blatantly untrue but you put it out there anyway?
THAT I don't get.

I've made this point before and I'll make it again.

Because Pandora allowed TCO to use her account, then she accepts full responsibility for what was posted.

It was a colossal mistake on her behalf to allow someone else to post in her name.

And the 5-yo is just asking for that candy to be stolen.

['Butterflies']

Do you even believe this yourself? Honestly?

Yes. I think your butthurt is immense right now. I can only assume it's because you think Les has left.

You are trying to attack my behaviour, by behaving worse than I have ever done. All whilst preaching from your soapbox that two wrongs don't make a right.
You're just a nasty little hypocrite.

So, how many innocent people have I attacked as part of this? 

You know what I think? I think you are the butthurt one here. You were called out on your behaviour and your usual shifting doesn't work. You've been exposed and that just gotta hurt.

As far as I can see, you have become nastier, and nastier, as you have become more desperate to get others to join your little crusade.
Thankfully it hasn't worked, so I feel anything but hurt, or butthurt.

[Squidusa]

TCO was hardly a worthy opponent and causing him another meltdown isn't enough stuff for Flaming 101.

Whether or not TCO was a "worthy opponent" in niether here nor there.

TCO was an antagonistic asshole who went asking for all this shit.

If this incident didn't "cause a meltdown" then something else would've.

As Rosanna Rosanna Danna used to say "If it isn't one thing, it's another. It's always something."

TCO did ask for it, yes. But riling him up is easier than stealing candy from a 5-yo and hardly warrants the attention.

As is winding up Pentagram and Razor yet I've not seen you speak against riling either of them up.

[Binty]

TCO was hardly a worthy opponent and causing him another meltdown isn't enough stuff for Flaming 101.

Whether or not TCO was a "worthy opponent" in niether here nor there.

TCO was an antagonistic asshole who went asking for all this shit.

If this incident didn't "cause a meltdown" then something else would've.

As Rosanna Rosanna Danna used to say "If it isn't one thing, it's another. It's always something."

TCO did ask for it, yes. But riling him up is easier than stealing candy from a 5-yo and hardly warrants the attention.

As is winding up Pentagram and Razor yet I've not seen you speak against riling either of them up.

QFT.

It only counts if the person in question is at least over 35 

['Butterflies']

TCO was hardly a worthy opponent and causing him another meltdown isn't enough stuff for Flaming 101.

Whether or not TCO was a "worthy opponent" in niether here nor there.

TCO was an antagonistic asshole who went asking for all this shit.

If this incident didn't "cause a meltdown" then something else would've.

As Rosanna Rosanna Danna used to say "If it isn't one thing, it's another. It's always something."

TCO did ask for it, yes. But riling him up is easier than stealing candy from a 5-yo and hardly warrants the attention.

As is winding up Pentagram and Razor yet I've not seen you speak against riling either of them up.

QFT.

It only counts if the person in question is at least over 35 

I think there is truth in that. I was warned about it, not long after I joined the site, and it is clear.

Penty is fair game for anyone, as is his family. Steve, much more of a dick than Penty at his worst, should be given special treatment, and we should all go out of our way to ensure he doesn't have a meltdown.
Odeon is just a hypocrite