So why do I support him and his behavior? I do not believe I have.
Fuck you!!! that's a fucking lie and you know it.
EDIT: I just read your diatribe for the second time now, and it absolutely disgusts me.
How DARE you try to blame anyone here for what is clearly TCO's fault!!!
We were NOT responsible for knowing that TCO was using Pandora's account. It is the combined fault of Pandora and TCO that that happened, and they are the only ones to blame.
All that you have shown, is what a disgusting, horrible evil EVIL EVIL piece of fucking shit TCO is.
Secondly, you have shown just how dumb Pandora is for sticking around that piece of shit. If these are the kind of manipulations that he is pulling on her on the internet, then I can only imagine how he fucks with her head IRL. I feel sorry for Pandora, but at some point she has to be held responsible for the fact that she doesn't leave him. If she loves him, I can only attribute that to Stockholm Syndrome. How blind can you be to not see TCO is a bad person?
Lastly, you Sir Les, need to see that TCO isn't a good person who does bad things, he's a bad person who plays nice when it suits him. That's the thing with these Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde personalitles, Mr. Hyde is the true person, Dr. Jekyl is the mask that they hide behind. My sister dates and marries people just like TCO. I've had 20+ years of experience with his type. Whether or not TCO has power over these "meltdowns" is a moot point. At the end of the day, it's just a power game that is designed to control people. Pandora is under his spell and he has sucked you into his routine too.
The best thing for Pandora is to leave TCO for good, and not dat anyone like him again. If TCO tries to stalk her, then he needs to have his brains bashed in and his body dumped in a river so the crocks can have their way with his corpse. Come to think of it, that's the best use for TCO....
Thank you for the contribution Scrap. What it lacked in insight , it made up for with disjointed hysteria.
Calm down big fella.
Once you manage to calm down I want you to try to not be quite a righteously indignant or pretend that you have the monopoly on truth and perception. Quite simply, you have an opinion.
"Grease Monkey (317) Al Swearengen (1195) - full page of lies In topic Yesterday at 06:33:54 PM "No my raging friend.
Let's look at things rationally and fairly. Humour us here Scrap and see if you can, even if just for an exercise in self-restraint and open-mindedness.
Have I ever...yes ever..supported TCO's right to say whatever he wanted unchallenged? Have I ever denounced people's right to defend against these attacks? I have certainly on occassion agreed with others against him and him against others and at times even criticised his behaviour. I have even tried to allow him an "out" on ocassion to man up and apologise and stop making things worse for him and the board members. But this is not what I just asked.
The fact is we have seen he has not been able to play well here. He does meltdown and it does not do him, nor the board nor the board members any favours when he does. I do not deny this and I do not recall ever having said anything to the contrary.
I also liken the analogy of the drunk too far gone with drink to control their actions at the time they are drunk to realise what they are doing (and who is both incapable of registering the effect of what they are doing at the time and with which trying to draw accountability is futile) to his actions when in meltdown.
But find where i say that he is not accountable for anything he says. The truth is, regardless of what we say or do, we all are regardless too of how emotional we are at the time. maybe in the heat of the moment or in the throes of a meltdown we are not of a mind to appreciate our actions but that does not excuse our actions.
You suggest I have indicated otherwise? Find it.
So no I do not defend his actions and have not. Have I been patient? Like a fucking saint.
Have I tried to avoid driving him to meltdown? Yup. This is not defending him either.
What about my personal views and beliefs on him and who and what he is off-forum? Yup been honest here too. I have volunteered these things freely. That is not as much defending him as making a valued judgment.
So again Scrap - Find the lies and not difference of opinion or difference of perspective or judgment. Or stop being a drama queen and frothing at the mouth. Make a claimn and back it properly. I don't give a damn whether you or anyone likes TCO. He has done a lot to make a lot of people dislike him and that is his cross to carry. I do not much care whether people like him or not nor form a poor opinion on him based on the actions they have seen online.
You don't need to back these things and i do not call your judgment on this to bear. Accuse me of lying you better do better than to make vaccous accusations, or you are going to look stupid and redundant.
What exactly have I blamed on people and what have i blamed on TCO?
Now for the benefit of what i can only assume is rather poor comprehension in a biased mindset of which would do Bill O'Reilly proud, i will break it back down for you here Scrap.
TCO on here attacks members? TCO. No issue with members attacking back and he has to back himself.
Members attack TCO? Members No issue with TCO attacking back and they have to back themselves.
TCO having a meltdown? Unfortunate. I do not believe in this state he can realise what he is doing/saying and addressing this pointless but that
he is still accountable for everything he says.
TCO pulling shit over at Facebook? TCO. Poor fucking form and he deserved to be taken to task personally for it.
TCO using Pandora's account? Stupid and poor form and
he is responsible for it. "Posse" going over there? TCO. He bouight that shit on himself. If it was not concerns i had that Pandora would get roped into it and that it was likely to ruin another online community for her, I likely would be part of that too. (I use the word "posse" because i think it best fits. I do not think of it in a negative light. A group of concerned people going as a united group to right a wrong)
No TCO - and the posse starts firing shots at Pandora as next best target? Primarily TCO. He set this up and had his girl taking fire for him.
Secondly the posse. Whilst it mayt have been unclear as to what was said or not by Pandora, I had put on the board what and who she was and that he did and does use her account sometimes so where there was a doubt who actually said what and that what was said fitted what i described in her and what you knew of him, I believe there ought to have been some restraint and an acceptance that she was not the person they sought to address, he was.
That said I understood as much as i did not like it and held my tongue. Celebrating giving my mate a flogging over here and talking up what a bitch she is whilst her friend is in the room? Everyone involved in said celebrating. Fucking poor form.
Still I held my tongue. Did not like it but did not complain.Trying to get a rancid sly dig at me after me not having reacted - with the "Rancidora" bullshit - and others cheering on that? Fucking pathetic and
everyone involved in that is responsible.
So, yes Scrap. TCO is to blame for TCO's actions and other's for their own actions. Don't try to interpret that I was trying to leave him blameless, that would be both dishonest and stupid.
"then I can only imagine how he fucks with her head IRL" Do not let your imagination run away with you Scrap. You may be right and you may not be. Until you are you are condemning her and him based on online activities only. You would not be my pick for a jury Scrap. Am i keen to make sure my friend is safe? Yes. Do i have concerns? Yes. Will I look out for her interests? Yes. Will I run down her future husband based on some online interactions which have proved that he does not do the online thing that well in aspie online environments? No and if you think so you are a fucking idiot. Does it mean I will look at such things carefully and with concern. Of course. I am a friend and I have her interests at heart. At the moment she is with a man who makes her happy and conversely sucks at these online fora. The two CAN exist mutually. I do not know whether one reflects the other but I will be fucked if I will be judge, jury and executioner based on such loose speculation and fear. That would be unfair, rash, dishonest and stupid.
Oh and heads up Scrap. TCO is not your brother in Law. You may know your brother in law and you may read into TCO some specific psychoanalytical online diagnosis but between you, me and the rest of the thinking people here, that means shit and if you are not too self-opinionated or full of yourself, I would say that you probably know that such armchair diagnosises or greater awarenesses mean shit. (Yes...even when i do it myself)
So go find the lies Scrap. Fucking hopeless.
Jack I answered your PM.