Does intuition favor God's existence?

[Jack]

Why are you talking to yourself?

Awiddershinlife didn't respond to my post.

[Gopher Gary]

Why are you talking to yourself?

Awiddershinlife didn't respond to my post.

Because you already know her answer, and she knows yours. 

[awiddershinlife]

Why are you talking to yourself?

Awiddershinlife didn't respond to my post.

Because you already know her answer, and she knows yours. 

I think all of you know shit, esp about me. What post was neglected?

[Jack]

This one.

I take it that King James is your go to edition?

Why is that?

your attraction to the "special language". Maybe you should tell me more about what you mean?

First tell me why you assumed I prefer the king james version. You'll like my answer about the language; it's interesting.

The bible has many voices. Shakespeare has complexity of characters. It sounds like you might enjoy the bible and I Shakespeare. Maybe it will turn out that we are actually on different ends of the same island and we could trade every so often

Is that you waving?

[awiddershinlife]

This one.

I take it that King James is your go to edition?

Why is that?

your attraction to the "special language". Maybe you should tell me more about what you mean?

First tell me why you assumed I prefer the king james version. You'll like my answer about the language; it's interesting.

I did answer that...your attraction to the "special language" from a previous post. So what's the answer I'll like?

The bible has many voices. Shakespeare has complexity of characters. It sounds like you might enjoy the bible and I Shakespeare. Maybe it will turn out that we are actually on different ends of the same island and we could trade every so often

Is that you waving?

  its me!

[Jack]

Ah, misunderstood. Now then thinking you might understand the answer. There's something unique about the language of both, something which makes the two very much alike, but still completely different than anything else. Don't really know what that is; a certain something I don't know what. That's why they have the same voice. Have before said, if not knowing for certain which was written first, would wonder who copied whose writing style. Both also share a quality which allows the reader to pluck a single sentence or phrase completely out of context, and it have so much meaning on its own, applicable to so many different moments and circumstance. Can't imagine there's much in life which both Shakespeare and the Bible aren't applicable.

[Jack]

Oh, plus really like all the proper Thy's and Thou's and eth's and ye's; it's rather amusing.

[odeon]

You should read it in the Finnish translation.

[Jack]

Why should I do that?

[awiddershinlife]

Ah, misunderstood. Now then thinking you might understand the answer. There's something unique about the language of both, something which makes the two very much alike, but still completely different than anything else. Don't really know what that is; a certain something I don't know what. That's why they have the same voice. Have before said, if not knowing for certain which was written first, would wonder who copied whose writing style.

I will try to find the research that showed bible thumping christians passages from the bible and from shakespeare for them to choose the ones from the bible. It was hard, many mistakes.

Both also share a quality which allows the reader to pluck a single sentence or phrase completely out of context, and it have so much meaning on its own, applicable to so many different moments and circumstance. Can't imagine there's much in life which both Shakespeare and the Bible aren't applicable.

That some idiot trying to prove something can take a quote out of context to prove s/he's right is a problem for those who take such things seriously. Luckily someone else can pull another scripture out of context from the Bible to refute the first. But I am not sure how this makes it applicable...

But the language of both (if using a translation like the King James rather than something like the New Life Version) are lofty enough to give it a feel of authority and beauty.

[Jack]

Ah, misunderstood. Now then thinking you might understand the answer. There's something unique about the language of both, something which makes the two very much alike, but still completely different than anything else. Don't really know what that is; a certain something I don't know what. That's why they have the same voice. Have before said, if not knowing for certain which was written first, would wonder who copied whose writing style.

I will try to find the research that showed bible thumping christians passages from the bible and from shakespeare for them to choose the ones from the bible. It was hard, many mistakes.

Both also share a quality which allows the reader to pluck a single sentence or phrase completely out of context, and it have so much meaning on its own, applicable to so many different moments and circumstance. Can't imagine there's much in life which both Shakespeare and the Bible aren't applicable.

That some idiot trying to prove something can take a quote out of context to prove s/he's right is a problem for those who take such things seriously. Luckily someone else can pull another scripture out of context from the Bible to refute the first. But I am not sure how this makes it applicable...

But the language of both (if using a translation like the King James rather than something like the New Life Version) are lofty enough to give it a feel of authority and beauty.

Maybe have been misunderstood. Was talking of personal experience, not research of others, and didn't mean to imply they're indiscernible. Not certain how anyone could prove anything at all with either, or completely sure what this response means. Not going to be borrowing the bible, then?

[Gopher Gary]

Can't imagine there's much in life which both Shakespeare and the Bible aren't applicable.

What does the shakespearian bible say about pooping, Jack? 

[Hannah]

As a dog returns to his poo so too a fool to his folly...(is what I think that proverb really means) it says vomit but dogs eat their poo not their vomit that I've seen 

[Gopher Gary]

    

[odeon]

Why should I do that?

For the fun of it?