Cracking are we? Excellent. 
You are, not me.
Oh sorry, yes there's two things, they're both books and fictional, oh sorry, my mistake. 
Nope, you're still making mistakes. A shame really.
Mathematics is logical and of course it's not open to personal interpretation, but it's logical because it has capacity to demonstrate real-life proofs to say indeed, 1 +1 does not equal 3 but 2 and is universally accepted. You need to play with toy blocks or a calculator more if you honestly are stupid enough to make such an argument.
I feel like believing that math books state that 1 + 1 = 2 and that science books state that the Earth is flat. It's my interpretation. Got a problem with that?
I mean you can't even concisely answer the question given to you about what makes the Bible legitimate and which denomination is correct.
The Bible is legit because God is the Author. And I already told you that salvation is not in any denomination. It's in Jesus Christ.
Your church of Jesus Christ answer is not specific enough, as there's dozens of denomination that fit that category, and yet all have different interpretations of the Bible.
If my answer doesn't satisfy you, that's your problem, not mine.
If you cannot even answer for why that is the case and provide a real-life proof that is unanimously accepted, then it's obvious the Bible is flawed.
I did answer; you just don't like it.
The Bible is not flawed. It's God's Word. Read it if you don't believe me.
How do you know what you believe is correct, not the work of a fraud if there's no empirical way to authenticate it?
Because I read it.
All you're offering is vague answer and twisting of words to suit your own arguments. You're hoping to tire us into submission, which I'm afraid isn't going to work. 
Ok, suit yourself.
