Actually stuff in real life happened so my session timed out.
My argument is very simple: if you ignore a callout, the fact that you did so will also tell things about you, like it or not. You have only a vague memory of the whole thing, yet you dismiss me as a "wanker" in that callout and state that it wasn't worth replying to. You mention the whole incident as an example of the things one can do instead of replying, instead of backing your shit up.
Yet you label my comment here as a shit and giggles callout because I "logged off" instead of replying right away.
You can't have it both ways, Eclair.
Well, I'm sorry, but yes, I do think you were being over emotional, attacking Soph, and then me for trying to translate what she meant.
I ignored the callout? ...'ignore' is a strong word...but I chose not to come into it, because you were clearly emotional because the attack involved your children, and it would be pointless to enter a debate when I was not advocating what was said, but merely trying to clarify what Soph said.
I basically thought you attacked me because it was an upsetting time for you and I did not feel it was fair to enter into the craziness...that there was no 'fight to win'...and whilst you were quite upset about what was said, I in no way supported it, I was merely someone who tried to translate the intent of another poster.
If you feel that says something about me, as being weak, when in fact I was trying not to come into anything emotional and had no aggression towards you, then I can live with that. Absolutely.