this or that?

[Calandale]

Then people don't either.
Pet's have developed NATURALLY
to be our slaves and lovers.

[SovaNu]

And what does "going macrobiotic" mean?  nvm, Google helped me

I see the benefits for both (I seriously doubt the "human cells" of the GM foods story). Macrobiotic foods (ie: locally grown grains, vegetables, etc) have been genetically modified over thousands of years of human farming technique. Utilising selective breeding; a slower version of genetic modification, farmers have been striving to produce hardier, more resistant and bountiful crops for years. Scientific technology has gotten to a point where we can do this much quicker than selective breeding.  So to answer your question. I'd choose both for they are one and the same

no they are not. real genetic modding is injecting poison into the very cell or "embryo" of the plant and then watching it grow into a fullysized poison plant. this is evil.

[SovaNu]

for the most best question ever!

the answer: uhh... that's a tough one. i've been dreaming about my old pets and they feel so dear to me. eating human flesh is disgusting. i really don't know. i guess i would have to say pet flesh if it died of natural causes.

... but pets don't die of natural causes. There is absolutely nothing natural about an animal getting old enough to develop organic failures in the wild. If they do happen to get that old, they would naturally lose the next battle for survival they enter. Even the very act of keeping a pet is unnatural to the animals.

oh well my guineapig died on my arms and it looked very natural. he turned very hard. riggomortis. but even the fat was hard. and he was fat. my fat little guineapig.

[GalileoAce]

And what does "going macrobiotic" mean?  nvm, Google helped me

I see the benefits for both (I seriously doubt the "human cells" of the GM foods story). Macrobiotic foods (ie: locally grown grains, vegetables, etc) have been genetically modified over thousands of years of human farming technique. Utilising selective breeding; a slower version of genetic modification, farmers have been striving to produce hardier, more resistant and bountiful crops for years. Scientific technology has gotten to a point where we can do this much quicker than selective breeding.  So to answer your question. I'd choose both for they are one and the same

no they are not. real genetic modding is injecting poison into the very cell or "embryo" of the plant and then watching it grow into a fullysized poison plant. this is evil.

I don't know who is feeding you that bullshit...But they're the evil ones.

[SovaNu]

it's not bullshit.

[Sophgay]

Melons or bananas?

[Parts]

melons

  or 

[TheoK]

  since I'm an aspie.   

Czech Republic or Slovakia?

[duncvis]

Czech Republic. Budvar and Staropramen ftw 

being trapped in a lift with a chronic farter or with those two annoying little cunts off the disney channel?

[TheoK]

You forgot that Silvia Saint is Slovak. 



I don't know about the cunts from Disney Channel, but I chose them anyway. 

[Parts]

death by gun or knife

[Scrapheap]

death by gun or knife

Gun

Death durring sex, or you orther favorite pass-time??

[Lucifer]

what other favourite pastime? 

[odeon]

Boggles the mind, doesn't it?

[Lucifer]

"the mind"...?