Author Topic: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?  (Read 1078 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« on: October 15, 2010, 06:54:57 AM »
I wonder how high a percentage of his applauding audiences are ALL atheists allready...

what a pointless douche that guy is.

im an atheist.
hes an atheist.
whats on tv?

seriously... he needs to just go home, and watch some tv or something.

his stupid little seminars, squirting his little droplets around on his laughing and applauding fans, wtf is the point?
they pay tickets
to aggree
he stands for an hour or two, telling them all what they allready know :b

i wonder if his books have little semen stains on them.

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2010, 07:04:48 AM »
Pope "atheists are nazis!"
Dawkins "whatthe! YOUR a nazi!!!"
Me "dude, chill, ignore him :S"
Dawkins "ALL CATHOLICS ARE NAZIS! HITLER WAS A CATHOLIC!!!"
Me "eh... relaaaax :S dont feed the troll :S"
Dawkins "NAZIS WERE CATHOLICS AND CATHOLICS ARE NAZIS TAKE THAT YOU NAZI!!!"

everybody knows catholics =/= nazis

so

he just made a major buttfuck ass of himself, and basically made himself look exactly like . . . the pope. good going Dawkins.
Your now "Pope of Atheism"

way to convince everyone atheism is not a religion.

Offline Al Swearegen

  • Pussycat of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 18721
  • Karma: 2240
  • Always front on and in your face
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2010, 07:20:12 AM »
Nice!
I2 today is not i2 of yesteryear. It is a knitting circle. Those that participate be they nice or asshats know their place and the price to be there. Odeon is the overlord

.Benevolent if you toe the line.

Think it is I2 of old? Even Odeon is not so delusional as to think otherwise. He may on occasionally pretend otherwise but his base is that knitting circle.

Censoring/banning/restricting/moderating myself, Calanadale & Scrapheap were all not his finest moments.

How to apologise to Scrap

Offline Parts

  • The Mad
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 37411
  • Karma: 3057
  • Gender: Female
  • Who are you?
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #3 on: October 15, 2010, 07:58:04 AM »
I don't listen to him I am an atheist also but don't care what he says though it's nice to have a real prick around to piss off the religious nutters
"Eat it up.  Wear it out.  Make it do or do without." 

'People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.'
George Bernard Shaw

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2010, 08:10:00 AM »
I don't listen to him I am an atheist also but don't care what he says though it's nice to have a real prick around to piss off the religious nutters

they get pissed off _allready_, im irritated that he is actually proving them right.
so in a sense, aggreeing with them
by acting like some religious cult leader, worshipping Science.

it should be just a frame of mind.

Offline Parts

  • The Mad
  • Caretaker Admin
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 37411
  • Karma: 3057
  • Gender: Female
  • Who are you?
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2010, 08:16:55 AM »
I don't listen to him I am an atheist also but don't care what he says though it's nice to have a real prick around to piss off the religious nutters

they get pissed off _allready_, im irritated that he is actually proving them right.
so in a sense, aggreeing with them
by acting like some religious cult leader, worshipping Science.

it should be just a frame of mind.

Yep our right on that he is treated the same as a cult leader but that's much the same as many famous people his problem is more what he does with it.  Still meh  I do like science though I don't worship it I did spend years studying it in college which was enough to have that worshiping science thing thrown at me on occasion especially since I was a biology student
"Eat it up.  Wear it out.  Make it do or do without." 

'People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.'
George Bernard Shaw

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2010, 08:29:04 AM »
of course i like science. im obsessed with science. im an atheist as well

but im not gonna make some FLAG "SCIENCE!" on it, and stuff...

i posted a similar thread in a non-aspie forum.

first reply, from a reasonable guy, he thought i should have criticized the pope instead.
DUH. PEOPLE MUST BE FUCKING SPOON-FED.
ill criticize the pope, like... breathing :S i wont even notice it :S the pope is excrement, thats nothing new.

im talking about dawkins now :D

you guys get it ;D

Offline Al Swearegen

  • Pussycat of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 18721
  • Karma: 2240
  • Always front on and in your face
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2010, 08:52:36 AM »
Don't show this thread to Randy or Richard. They will masturbate to anything and likely film it. I have it on good authority that Richard masterbates to Fire Agates. ewwww..... >:(
I2 today is not i2 of yesteryear. It is a knitting circle. Those that participate be they nice or asshats know their place and the price to be there. Odeon is the overlord

.Benevolent if you toe the line.

Think it is I2 of old? Even Odeon is not so delusional as to think otherwise. He may on occasionally pretend otherwise but his base is that knitting circle.

Censoring/banning/restricting/moderating myself, Calanadale & Scrapheap were all not his finest moments.

How to apologise to Scrap

Frolic_Fun

  • Guest
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2010, 08:57:44 AM »
I don't like him much either, as he represents the self-important atheist types, or "religious athiests" as I call them. The type that treats scientists like priests that spread the gospel. The problem with that is that science itself NEVER claims to be the ultimate proof, only an attempt to find out and understand.

While I agree with much with what athiests say, I do find there are unanswered questions related to the universe, what happens when we die and so on. I don't think we will ever find out those answers, no matter how advanced science becomes. I also think the concept of "god" and religion in general is bullshit, but I do believe there may be some "force" that provides the procedural codes for the universe to expand and grow, ie. like an equation for a computer generated fractal.

Fairly agnostic. :zoinks:
« Last Edit: October 15, 2010, 09:00:27 AM by Shleed. »

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2010, 09:03:36 AM »
I don't like him much either, as he represents the self-important atheist types, or "religious athiests" as I call them. The type that treats scientists like priests that spread the gospel. The problem with that is that science itself NEVER claims to be the ultimate proof, only an attempt to find out and understand.

While I agree with much with what athiests say, I do find there are unanswered questions related to the universe, what happens when we die and so on. I don't think we will ever find out those answers, no matter how advanced science becomes. I also think the concept of "god" and religion in general is bullshit, but I do believe there may be some "force" that provides the procedural codes for the universe to expand and grow, ie. like an equation for a computer generated fractal.

Fairly agnostic. :zoinks:

yeah, theyre just labels anyway. his way of preaching is emotionally grounded, and it fits the religious culty mindset.

i refer to myself as atheist, but come on... it doesnt take a genious just to consider the age of existence vs the age of our meat-brain. i shouldnt even have to point it out :D

"force" sounds so star-wars, i call it chaos.
like...
the neverending inevitable echo/bounce-effect of the very first existensial expansion (big bang)

words TOTALLY corrupt reality sometimes...

like, i call it chaos, and people misinterpret it as... "messy" or something, and act as if im somehow insulting the universe. like, evolution is chaos also. none of the animals could predict land-masses to move, weather couldnt predict that it would change, etc etc etc. endless butterfly-effect...

words wont suffice :D
« Last Edit: October 15, 2010, 09:05:22 AM by ZEGH8578 »

Frolic_Fun

  • Guest
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2010, 09:09:12 AM »
The universe is more of a balance between chaos and order, so it's hard to think up a suitable word. :orly:

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2010, 09:14:42 AM »
The universe is more of a balance between chaos and order, so it's hard to think up a suitable word. :orly:

yes, especially because its just as hard to properly DEFINE... chaos / order

in a sense, they are/can be/imo synonymous :I
*head-pop*

/
like when do you truly see order, in life? from what i can tell, only in man-made scenarios. like... you arrange a row of pencils, in an orderly fashion. but chaos brought you to that table, with those pencils, at that moment of time. its.. gah.. where are the old greeks when we need them :b it is what it is :I
« Last Edit: October 15, 2010, 09:16:47 AM by ZEGH8578 »

Frolic_Fun

  • Guest
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2010, 09:36:13 AM »
How geometry works in the universe is a good example of chaos/order. A sphere for example: the order will give the impression of a sphere, while the chaos dictates the sphere is not "perfect", meaning it may have a bulge around the centre, holes/pits etc.

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2010, 09:40:54 AM »
How geometry works in the universe is a good example of chaos/order. A sphere for example: the order will give the impression of a sphere, while the chaos dictates the sphere is not "perfect", meaning it may have a bulge around the centre, holes/pits etc.

but if you "zoom in further" there will be a certain... "chaotic unknown" in the process of attraction

i try to separate humans subjectiveness from the universe, but its next to impossible, being human, w a brain.

its almost a curse i think. we can only understand as far as our brains allow us.
we can only understand earthly concepts, and try to implement them onto outer-space.

like when people think about "before" space or "outside" space.
"before" and "outside" are purely earthly concepts.
"before" we arrived at the camp, or before we heard some noise.
"outside" the bag, outside the cave, outside the clouds.

but the universe needs no "outside"
just like elementary particles needs no shape

brain-pop again.

anyway, up dawkins ass AND
fuck this guy, and his incessant fucking screaming:


now THIS guy
i like:
« Last Edit: October 15, 2010, 09:43:05 AM by ZEGH8578 »

richard

  • Guest
Re: Masturbate much to Richard Dawkins?
« Reply #14 on: October 15, 2010, 12:36:00 PM »
Once again, Further proof that a non belief in god can be just as fucking stupid as belief in him