Banned again from WP

[richard]

Meadow, I am sorry for treating you like shit. I want to sincerly apologize

Best wishes, and get well soon.

Can I have your phone number?

[The_Chosen_One]

Couold someone with any intellect explain to me how someone could sue for libel over something posted on a forum?

Then we can go back to the icecreams and seagulls.

I already covered that when I pointed out that even with all her education, she's "only as bright as......"
You're a little slow, aren't you?

It was a rhetorical question, and I did ask for someone with intellect. Oh, I forgot, your autistic.

Even richard would have done.

"Even richard would have done." What is that? It certainly isn't a complete sentence, and it makes no sense at all.

Autism doesn't mean retarded, RETARD. That's what everyone is so confused about, especially the RETARDS who are not autistic. Retards are Retards. People who are autistic are "trapped inside" but actually extremely intelligent behind their handicap.

You've only proven what a moron you are. What lives between your ears is the rhetorical question.

Well, Miss Anger-management 101: on the subject of richard and intellect, his would by far outweigh yours in any given spectrum. Autism may not mean retarded, but as I haven't yet seen anything from you that would come close to an intellectual reply, your autism has yet to be proved. Hell, even Raymond Babbitt (Rain-Man) would give it a better run for its money than you.

You may call me (and everyone else here) morons, that's fine. But who is having more fun taking the piss out of everything you are saying?

BTW, does the name Hannah Capps ring any bells with you?

[The_Chosen_One]

Couold someone with any intellect explain to me how someone could sue for libel over something posted on a forum?

Then we can go back to the icecreams and seagulls.

If someone writes something false about someone else that harms their profesional reputation, then that writer can be sued for libel.

If I write that Steve-O is a silly little girl, although that's obviously false, it does not really harm your reputation IRL, so it's not libel.  

However, if I wrote something false about my daughter's special education teacher who abused her, using her real name, and got people who knew her professionally to read it, that could harm her reputation and her ability to earn a living, and I could be sued for libel.  If I wrote that she put soap in my daughter's mouth and choked her, even though it's true, I could still be sued for libel and forced to prove my allegations in court.  If I couldn't prove it and it seemed to the court that I was just saying this maliciously, I could still have to pay a judgement.

Thankyou. An intellectual reply. I doubt What's-her-name could have sued anyway, because no actual damage was done to her rep as no-one outside here could have read it. She may have felt insulted, but libelled? I doubt it. She would also have to prove who the person was IRL who wrote whatever it was, and on the internet it's very hard to get that proof.

[Meadow]

Richard is a pervert. I can understand why Steve has alliances with that sort of "intellect". You're all the same, internet flies. And I couldn't possibly be worried at all about libel, either.

[ProfessorFarnsworth]

[Adam]

I just woke up

[Meadow]

Couold someone with any intellect explain to me how someone could sue for libel over something posted on a forum?

Then we can go back to the icecreams and seagulls.

If someone writes something false about someone else that harms their profesional reputation, then that writer can be sued for libel.

If I write that Steve-O is a silly little girl, although that's obviously false, it does not really harm your reputation IRL, so it's not libel.  

However, if I wrote something false about my daughter's special education teacher who abused her, using her real name, and got people who knew her professionally to read it, that could harm her reputation and her ability to earn a living, and I could be sued for libel.  If I wrote that she put soap in my daughter's mouth and choked her, even though it's true, I could still be sued for libel and forced to prove my allegations in court.  If I couldn't prove it and it seemed to the court that I was just saying this maliciously, I could still have to pay a judgement.

Thankyou. An intellectual reply. I doubt What's-her-name could have sued anyway, because no actual damage was done to her rep as no-one outside here could have read it. She may have felt insulted, but libelled? I doubt it. She would also have to prove who the person was IRL who wrote whatever it was, and on the internet it's very hard to get that proof.

See how stupid you are? It was the "supposed" Temple Grandin threatening to sue me for libel. You are even more stupid than I thought you were.

[P7PSP]

I just woke up

Good morning Soph.

[richard]

I'm not richard. I just fucking apologized to your ass! apologized!

And it was sincere!  

[ZEGH8578]

i find this to be relevant

[The_Chosen_One]

Richard is a pervert. I can understand why Steve has alliances with that sort of "intellect". You're all the same, internet flies. And I couldn't possibly be worried at all about libel, either.

Yes, richard is a pervert. He's 'our' pervert. Which means he is fun.

[P7PSP]

Couold someone with any intellect explain to me how someone could sue for libel over something posted on a forum?

Then we can go back to the icecreams and seagulls.

If someone writes something false about someone else that harms their profesional reputation, then that writer can be sued for libel.

If I write that Steve-O is a silly little girl, although that's obviously false, it does not really harm your reputation IRL, so it's not libel.  

However, if I wrote something false about my daughter's special education teacher who abused her, using her real name, and got people who knew her professionally to read it, that could harm her reputation and her ability to earn a living, and I could be sued for libel.  If I wrote that she put soap in my daughter's mouth and choked her, even though it's true, I could still be sued for libel and forced to prove my allegations in court.  If I couldn't prove it and it seemed to the court that I was just saying this maliciously, I could still have to pay a judgement.

Thankyou. An intellectual reply. I doubt What's-her-name could have sued anyway, because no actual damage was done to her rep as no-one outside here could have read it. She may have felt insulted, but libelled? I doubt it. She would also have to prove who the person was IRL who wrote whatever it was, and on the internet it's very hard to get that proof.

She was not libeled. She was probably angry about being the other woman.

[Queen Victoria]

I just woke up

Go back to sleep.  This whole mess will give anyone a headache and indigestion. 

Pet Jess instead.

[Meadow]

You guys are such morons, you don't even know what's going on. So much for the male intellect.

[The_Chosen_One]

i find this to be relevant

The last time I heard that was on Home Alone.