Educational

Author Topic: Banned again from WP  (Read 39629 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

richard

  • Guest
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1140 on: October 09, 2010, 10:19:41 PM »
Meadow, I am sorry for treating you like shit. I want to sincerly apologize

Best wishes, and get well soon.

Can I have your phone number?

The_Chosen_One

  • Guest
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1141 on: October 09, 2010, 10:25:34 PM »
Couold someone with any intellect explain to me how someone could sue for libel over something posted on a forum?

Then we can go back to the icecreams and seagulls.

I already covered that when I pointed out that even with all her education, she's "only as bright as......"
You're a little slow, aren't you?

It was a rhetorical question, and I did ask for someone with intellect. Oh, I forgot, your autistic.

Even richard would have done.

"Even richard would have done." What is that? It certainly isn't a complete sentence, and it makes no sense at all.

Autism doesn't mean retarded, RETARD. That's what everyone is so confused about, especially the RETARDS who are not autistic. Retards are Retards. People who are autistic are "trapped inside" but actually extremely intelligent behind their handicap.

You've only proven what a moron you are. What lives between your ears is the rhetorical question.

Well, Miss Anger-management 101: on the subject of richard and intellect, his would by far outweigh yours in any given spectrum. Autism may not mean retarded, but as I haven't yet seen anything from you that would come close to an intellectual reply, your autism has yet to be proved. Hell, even Raymond Babbitt (Rain-Man) would give it a better run for its money than you.

You may call me (and everyone else here) morons, that's fine. But who is having more fun taking the piss out of everything you are saying?

BTW, does the name Hannah Capps ring any bells with you?

The_Chosen_One

  • Guest
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1142 on: October 09, 2010, 10:31:29 PM »
Couold someone with any intellect explain to me how someone could sue for libel over something posted on a forum?

Then we can go back to the icecreams and seagulls.

If someone writes something false about someone else that harms their profesional reputation, then that writer can be sued for libel.

If I write that Steve-O is a silly little girl, although that's obviously false, it does not really harm your reputation IRL, so it's not libel.  

However, if I wrote something false about my daughter's special education teacher who abused her, using her real name, and got people who knew her professionally to read it, that could harm her reputation and her ability to earn a living, and I could be sued for libel.  If I wrote that she put soap in my daughter's mouth and choked her, even though it's true, I could still be sued for libel and forced to prove my allegations in court.  If I couldn't prove it and it seemed to the court that I was just saying this maliciously, I could still have to pay a judgement.

Thankyou. An intellectual reply. I doubt What's-her-name could have sued anyway, because no actual damage was done to her rep as no-one outside here could have read it. She may have felt insulted, but libelled? I doubt it. She would also have to prove who the person was IRL who wrote whatever it was, and on the internet it's very hard to get that proof.


Offline Meadow

  • Delicate Flower of the Autie Elite
  • Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 1618
  • Karma: 30
  • Gender: Female
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1143 on: October 09, 2010, 10:32:00 PM »
Richard is a pervert. I can understand why Steve has alliances with that sort of "intellect". You're all the same, internet flies. And I couldn't possibly be worried at all about libel, either.

Offline ProfessorFarnsworth

  • Mad scientist at work
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 5224
  • Karma: 528
  • Gender: Male
  • Good news everyone!
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1144 on: October 09, 2010, 10:33:54 PM »
Existence actually has two broad meanings despite its apparent meaningless. The constant reconciliation of all its parts, and the conservation of any closed system as a whole.

Morality can be extrapolated from these meanings to make these two commandments of godless morality: 1). Be in harmony with one another and 2). Care for the environment.

Offline Adam

  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 24530
  • Karma: 1260
  • Gender: Male
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1145 on: October 09, 2010, 10:34:30 PM »
I just woke up

Offline Meadow

  • Delicate Flower of the Autie Elite
  • Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 1618
  • Karma: 30
  • Gender: Female
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1146 on: October 09, 2010, 10:34:41 PM »
Couold someone with any intellect explain to me how someone could sue for libel over something posted on a forum?

Then we can go back to the icecreams and seagulls.

If someone writes something false about someone else that harms their profesional reputation, then that writer can be sued for libel.

If I write that Steve-O is a silly little girl, although that's obviously false, it does not really harm your reputation IRL, so it's not libel.  

However, if I wrote something false about my daughter's special education teacher who abused her, using her real name, and got people who knew her professionally to read it, that could harm her reputation and her ability to earn a living, and I could be sued for libel.  If I wrote that she put soap in my daughter's mouth and choked her, even though it's true, I could still be sued for libel and forced to prove my allegations in court.  If I couldn't prove it and it seemed to the court that I was just saying this maliciously, I could still have to pay a judgement.

Thankyou. An intellectual reply. I doubt What's-her-name could have sued anyway, because no actual damage was done to her rep as no-one outside here could have read it. She may have felt insulted, but libelled? I doubt it. She would also have to prove who the person was IRL who wrote whatever it was, and on the internet it's very hard to get that proof.



See how stupid you are? It was the "supposed" Temple Grandin threatening to sue me for libel. You are even more stupid than I thought you were.

P7PSP

  • Guest
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1147 on: October 09, 2010, 10:35:02 PM »

richard

  • Guest
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1148 on: October 09, 2010, 10:35:18 PM »
I'm not richard. I just fucking apologized to your ass! apologized!

And it was sincere!  >:D

Offline ZEGH8578

  • Idealist Nihilist Socialist Primitivist Anarchist
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 7548
  • Karma: 492
  • Gender: Male
  • NTWADUMELA
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1149 on: October 09, 2010, 10:35:46 PM »
i find this to be relevant


The_Chosen_One

  • Guest
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1150 on: October 09, 2010, 10:36:08 PM »
Richard is a pervert. I can understand why Steve has alliances with that sort of "intellect". You're all the same, internet flies. And I couldn't possibly be worried at all about libel, either.

Yes, richard is a pervert. He's 'our' pervert. Which means he is fun.


P7PSP

  • Guest
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1151 on: October 09, 2010, 10:36:58 PM »
Couold someone with any intellect explain to me how someone could sue for libel over something posted on a forum?

Then we can go back to the icecreams and seagulls.

If someone writes something false about someone else that harms their profesional reputation, then that writer can be sued for libel.

If I write that Steve-O is a silly little girl, although that's obviously false, it does not really harm your reputation IRL, so it's not libel.  

However, if I wrote something false about my daughter's special education teacher who abused her, using her real name, and got people who knew her professionally to read it, that could harm her reputation and her ability to earn a living, and I could be sued for libel.  If I wrote that she put soap in my daughter's mouth and choked her, even though it's true, I could still be sued for libel and forced to prove my allegations in court.  If I couldn't prove it and it seemed to the court that I was just saying this maliciously, I could still have to pay a judgement.

Thankyou. An intellectual reply. I doubt What's-her-name could have sued anyway, because no actual damage was done to her rep as no-one outside here could have read it. She may have felt insulted, but libelled? I doubt it. She would also have to prove who the person was IRL who wrote whatever it was, and on the internet it's very hard to get that proof.


:agreed: She was not libeled. She was probably angry about being the other woman.

Offline Queen Victoria

  • Ruler of Aspie Universe
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 28244
  • Karma: 2805
  • Gender: Female
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1152 on: October 09, 2010, 10:38:26 PM »
I just woke up

Go back to sleep.  This whole mess will give anyone a headache and indigestion. 

Pet Jess instead.
A good monarch is a treasure. A good politician is an oxymoron.

My brain is both uninhibited and uninhabited.

:qv:

Offline Meadow

  • Delicate Flower of the Autie Elite
  • Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 1618
  • Karma: 30
  • Gender: Female
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1153 on: October 09, 2010, 10:38:36 PM »
You guys are such morons, you don't even know what's going on. So much for the male intellect.

The_Chosen_One

  • Guest
Re: Banned again from WP
« Reply #1154 on: October 09, 2010, 10:38:50 PM »
i find this to be relevant



The last time I heard that was on Home Alone.