Couold someone with any intellect explain to me how someone could sue for libel over something posted on a forum?
Then we can go back to the icecreams and seagulls.
I already covered that when I pointed out that even with all her education, she's "only as bright as......"
You're a little slow, aren't you?
It was a rhetorical question, and I did ask for someone with intellect. Oh, I forgot, your autistic.
Even richard would have done.
"Even richard would have done." What is that? It certainly isn't a complete sentence, and it makes no sense at all.
Autism doesn't mean retarded, RETARD. That's what everyone is so confused about, especially the RETARDS who are not autistic. Retards are Retards. People who are autistic are "trapped inside" but actually extremely intelligent behind their handicap.
You've only proven what a moron you are. What lives between your ears is the rhetorical question.
Well, Miss Anger-management 101: on the subject of richard and intellect, his would by far outweigh yours in any given spectrum. Autism may not mean retarded, but as I haven't yet seen anything from you that would come close to an intellectual reply, your autism has yet to be proved. Hell, even Raymond Babbitt (Rain-Man) would give it a better run for its money than you.
You may call me (and everyone else here) morons, that's fine. But who is having more fun taking the piss out of everything you are saying?
BTW, does the name Hannah Capps ring any bells with you?