How many Rolf Harris victims does it take to change a light bulb? 50. Three to do it now and then 47 to do it thirty years later when it is more profitable.
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
The problem is though, what makes the strings have specific configurations? There would have to be a simpler framework underneath all that.
Quote from: ProfessorFarnsworth on September 11, 2010, 10:23:16 AMThe problem is though, what makes the strings have specific configurations? There would have to be a simpler framework underneath all that.Why? Simple is not always true.
I find it interesting it's called String Theory when they still don't know what fuck it is.String Hypothesis yeah, but...
Quote from: odeon on September 11, 2010, 03:45:27 PMQuote from: ProfessorFarnsworth on September 11, 2010, 10:23:16 AMThe problem is though, what makes the strings have specific configurations? There would have to be a simpler framework underneath all that.Why? Simple is not always true.Because I wouldn't consider these strings to being intrinsic if they hold specific configurations aka matter, as opposed to just one or an infinite broadband without explanation. Any result to explain this would have to imply a simpler framework dictating their specific behaviour, and the answer 'they just are' doesn't convince me.
Quote from: ProfessorFarnsworth on September 11, 2010, 10:51:55 PMQuote from: odeon on September 11, 2010, 03:45:27 PMQuote from: ProfessorFarnsworth on September 11, 2010, 10:23:16 AMThe problem is though, what makes the strings have specific configurations? There would have to be a simpler framework underneath all that.Why? Simple is not always true.Because I wouldn't consider these strings to being intrinsic if they hold specific configurations aka matter, as opposed to just one or an infinite broadband without explanation. Any result to explain this would have to imply a simpler framework dictating their specific behaviour, and the answer 'they just are' doesn't convince me.They just are is sometimes the right answer.
Quote from: odeon on September 12, 2010, 11:20:57 AMQuote from: ProfessorFarnsworth on September 11, 2010, 10:51:55 PMQuote from: odeon on September 11, 2010, 03:45:27 PMQuote from: ProfessorFarnsworth on September 11, 2010, 10:23:16 AMThe problem is though, what makes the strings have specific configurations? There would have to be a simpler framework underneath all that.Why? Simple is not always true.Because I wouldn't consider these strings to being intrinsic if they hold specific configurations aka matter, as opposed to just one or an infinite broadband without explanation. Any result to explain this would have to imply a simpler framework dictating their specific behaviour, and the answer 'they just are' doesn't convince me.They just are is sometimes the right answer. Only if it's an axiom.