OK, MNZ or Bearfart. BBQ time.

['andersom']

Oh, sorry TCO, for so completely derailing this, before it even got started.

[The_Chosen_One]

This is what MNZ's sister should use on her:



then tell her to GTFO.

[The_Chosen_One]

Oh, sorry TCO, for so completely derailing this, before it even got started.

Don't worry hyke, it's here to put shit on her/him/it so go for it.

[skyblue1]

sorry couldnt resist

[Osensitive1]

To me, it was a story about a sweet young kid, that does not know the meaning of the word "heartache" and who is worried, because his Mum is using hearttablets.

Yes. She is crying because of her heart and takes heart meds. If he had no empathy or emotional connection, he wouldn't have expressed concern in the first place. Easy to see your point.

Schematic drawings.

[Osensitive1]

Oh, sorry TCO, for so completely derailing this, before it even got started.

Never understood this section of the site anyway.

[The_Chosen_One]

To me, it was a story about a sweet young kid, that does not know the meaning of the word "heartache" and who is worried, because his Mum is using hearttablets.

Yes. She is crying because of her heart and takes heart meds. If he had no empathy or emotional connection, he wouldn't have expressed concern in the first place. Easy to see your point.

  Meant as a connection to MNZ's bullshit and LACK of empathey toward he sister and anyone else.

Schematic drawings.

MNZ -

["couldbecousin"]

Did you read the part off limits to autisitics? All interested now.

And what was her name?! 

Her name is Collette de Bruin

She uses who, what, where, when, and how, to explain the world. In itself really practical and all. It's the way she writes about it, that got me fuming. I could see the practical impact of her approach, and that it was a better approach to look at problems with someone on the spectrum as a problem that was there for a reason. The explanation and the assumptions about autistic people she did in the side information, like saying the "why" question can hardly ever be discussed with someone on the spectrum, and the whole programming attitude that comes with it, got me get a really dirty taste in my mouth reading her book.

And the examples she used. I remember one example of a little kid seeing his Mum in tears, and he asks her what is wrong. So, his Mum tells him she has a heartache. The little boy asks if it is because of the fries Mum had eaten, and if she had taken her heart tablets.

To Collette, it was clear that this little boy had no empathy, and was not appropriately reacting to his Mum, and had no emotional connection with her either. To me, it was a story about a sweet young kid, that does not know the meaning of the word "heartache" and who is worried, because his Mum is using hearttablets.

Been a few years since I read the book. Was not a book that made me happier, despite the fact that she did have some very practically sound ideas.

People jump to such stupid conclusions. Maybe Collette de Bruin doesn't have enough  empathy  to remember that young children of all neurotypes are still learning language, and may have trouble understanding the idiomatic expressions used by adults. 

[SBI_Patience]

That bear person shall not be BBQ, you'd probably ruin the delicious flavours, you're better off BOILING him/her.
But since she was just one of those morons, I'd probably end up throwing her in a bin or something...

[ProfessorFarnsworth]

Strip her naked, dip her in honey and throw her into a pit full of hungry bears. However I'm not sure her ugliness might scare the bears away though, so a paper bag may be required.

[The_Chosen_One]

Does a bear shit in the woods? Certainly, if it sees MNZ naked.

[skyblue1]

shit happens to bears in the woods

[The_Chosen_One]

shit happens to bears in the woods

Maybe he could do with a dose of Imodium to stop the verbal diarrhoea.

[Frolic_Fun]

You should marry her.

[The_Chosen_One]

You should marry her.

Nah, sheep-shaggin's only a last resort, for when I get cancer. Still, even I'm not that desperate.