Quatermass pwned

[Natalia Evans]

I think I have been banned as well,  I can't log in.

You can contact Alex on AIM and ask him to reset your password.

[McGiver]

I think I have been banned as well,  I can't log in.

You can contact Alex on AIM and ask him to reset your password.

why don't you do it for her missy popular?

[Natalia Evans]

Because Alex wants people to go to him.

[McGiver]

Because Alex wants people to go to him.

he is the Don of the internet.

but i heard that he only grants wishes on this day the day of his daughters wedding.

[Scrapheap]

This thread is hysterical!!

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt118797.html

[Callaway]

This thread is hysterical!!

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt118797.html

It was great, but Alex locked it before anyone else could post in it.

[Scrapheap]

This thread is hysterical!!

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt118797.html

It was great, but Alex locked it before anyone else could post in it.

And Alex's response speaks volumes in just 3 words.

He works hard, censoring all the criticism of his site.

[Al Swearegen]

This thread is hysterical!!

http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt118797.html

It was great, but Alex locked it before anyone else could post in it.

And Alex's response speaks volumes in just 3 words.

He works hard, censoring all the criticism of his site.

Hell I felt that it was too good to pass up.

[McGiver]

i won't go there to read it.  what does it say?

[Al Swearegen]

i won't go there to read it.  what does it say?

OK I admit not to being a saint nor a sweetheart.

It concerns me little if I am collateral damage here and banned but if there is one thing I abhor, it is hypocrisy and double standards.

So. Your mods. The members elected by Alex to support you all, have recently been stripped of their powers and there is a suspicion of foul play and needless thread deletion and member deletion. Alex is not happy.

So maybe some mods are not so supportive of this support site.

Which of them (now they are temporarily normal members) are not behaving in line with the standards and codes and rules they themselves enforce and ban people on?

2. Personal attacks.
This includes insinuation, ridicule and personal insults, regardless of whether direct or indirect. Attacking an opinion, belief or philosophy is acceptable, but attacking the person making the comments is not.

Quatermass wrote:
You disgust me. Pathetic, petty little minds who cannot get over slights either imagined or exaggerated as justification for doing what you want, regardless of how others feel. You are poor examples of the human race as a whole, regardless of whether or not you have Asperger's, autism, or are an NT.........Humility? You are one to talk..... you get to be an idiot or a malicious little sod with impunity......We try not to take things personally, but you lot...that's all you ever do. That's all you ever will. Wake up to yourselves, or vacate the premises..


Ban Quartermass for personal attacks?

sinsboldly wrote:
Meadow wrote:
sinsboldly wrote:
Meadow wrote:
*hugs* I know...I was sobbing too, for quite some time. I didn't do anything to deserve it.

Ana54_Again wrote:
When ShadesOfMe was banned by Lau she started feeling like hurting herself. Me too, but I couldn't do it. I tried, with a pen and then a knife, but it was too gross and painful.



So you ladies are saying that you self harm if anyone crosses what you think is 'unfair' and so everyone must do as you say or you will threaten more self harm? Is that how that works?


Don't put words in my mouth! I never said anything of the kind!!


just do a search on your username, Aspieartist, there are posts everywhere how you have to have special treatment because of your prior abuse and sensitive feelings. Your own words tell the story



Ban Sinsboldly for bullying?

These two disempowered mods are not acting in the interests of this support site.

Opinions?

[Al Swearegen]

Alex locked the thread after posting (Not appropriate)

[McGiver]

it is not appropriate to have an opinion?
or, it is not appropriate to ask the mods to follow the same rules that they require of everyone else AND to be an example.

if anyone is banworthy there, i think it is the mods who do not adhere to the same standards they expect the common member to adhere to.

[Al Swearegen]

it is not appropriate to have an opinion?
or, it is not appropriate to ask the mods to follow the same rules that they require of everyone else AND to be an example.

if anyone is banworthy there, i think it is the mods who do not adhere to the same standards they expect the common member to adhere to.

Precisely.
I think personally that he disliked having the torch shone on his chosen representatives.

[McGiver]

it is not appropriate to have an opinion?
or, it is not appropriate to ask the mods to follow the same rules that they require of everyone else AND to be an example.

if anyone is banworthy there, i think it is the mods who do not adhere to the same standards they expect the common member to adhere to.

Precisely.
I think personally that he disliked having the torch shone on his chosen representatives.

they shone it on themselves.

people must take responsibility for their actions given the situation they put themselves in and the laws that prevail.

[McGiver]

as an example:

i could not adhere to the rules of WP.  i am not socially slick like some and i have strong opinions.  so i thought of an idea for a free speech website for retards.