Intenistians you'd love to meet IRL

[GalileoAce]

But any real male would fuck an attractive 24 yo woman. 

A "No True Scotsman" fallacious argument... Maybe one day you'll graduate to using actual credible arguments.

Lit is engaging in discussion that most men in the world understand very well, the fact that you wish you didn't have a dick does not invalidate his point. Most males are heterosexual and like pussy whether you grasp that point or not.

Again not my point. Whilst you correctly said "most males", he said "any real male", the problem here being the "real" part. His implication being if you don't want to fuck a 24yr old woman you're not a real male. This is called the logical fallacy known as "No True Scotsman", which I linked to.

It's not a logical fallacy. Every heterosexual, physically and mentally healthy man, would fuck a 24 yo attractive female, if he got the chance. That's kind of the definition of "heterosexual, physically and mentally healthy male".

You didn't say "heterosexual, physically and mentally healthy male", you said "any real male".

[TheoK]

But any real male would fuck an attractive 24 yo woman. 

A "No True Scotsman" fallacious argument... Maybe one day you'll graduate to using actual credible arguments.

Lit is engaging in discussion that most men in the world understand very well, the fact that you wish you didn't have a dick does not invalidate his point. Most males are heterosexual and like pussy whether you grasp that point or not.

Again not my point. Whilst you correctly said "most males", he said "any real male", the problem here being the "real" part. His implication being if you don't want to fuck a 24yr old woman you're not a real male. This is called the logical fallacy known as "No True Scotsman", which I linked to.

It's not a logical fallacy. Every heterosexual, physically and mentally healthy man, would fuck a 24 yo attractive female, if he got the chance. That's kind of the definition of "heterosexual, physically and mentally healthy male".

You didn't say "heterosexual, physically and mentally healthy male", you said "any real male".

Yes, "real" in a not so philosophical sence usually implicates above aspects. PPK understands exactly what I mean, for instance.

[P7PSP]

But any real male would fuck an attractive 24 yo woman. 

A "No True Scotsman" fallacious argument... Maybe one day you'll graduate to using actual credible arguments.

Lit is engaging in discussion that most men in the world understand very well, the fact that you wish you didn't have a dick does not invalidate his point. Most males are heterosexual and like pussy whether you grasp that point or not.

Again not my point. Whilst you correctly said "most males", he said "any real male", the problem here being the "real" part. His implication being if you don't want to fuck a 24yr old woman you're not a real male. This is called the logical fallacy known as "No True Scotsman", which I linked to.

It's not a logical fallacy. Every heterosexual, physically and mentally healthy man, would fuck a 24 yo attractive female, if he got the chance. That's kind of the definition of "heterosexual, physically and mentally healthy male".

He is caught up in impressing himself with sophistry Lit.   GA you're on the debate team!   In the meantime Lit has made a point that resonates better in bars and sporting events around the world.   To Lit for communicating effectively and busting the balls of the debate team in one post.

[ProfessorFarnsworth]

Yes, "real" in a not so philosophical sence usually implicates above aspects. PPK understands exactly what I mean, for instance.

I know what you mean too, you didn't mean a real man, you mean a "real" man, as in what you normally expect. Right?

[GalileoAce]

I forgot. This is intensity. I should expect no intelligent discourse the majority of it's membership.

[P7PSP]

I forgot. This is intensity. I should expect no intelligent discourse the majority of it's membership.

:lol: Correct, you are the only smart person here. 

[GalileoAce]

I forgot. This is intensity. I should expect no intelligent discourse the majority of it's membership.

:lol: Correct, you are the only smart person here. 

If you wish to make that assumption, feel free. But that is not what said.

[TheoK]

Yes, "real" in a not so philosophical sence usually implicates above aspects. PPK understands exactly what I mean, for instance.

I know what you mean too, you didn't mean a real man, you mean a "real" man, as in what you normally expect. Right?

[TheoK]

I forgot. This is intensity. I should expect no intelligent discourse the majority of it's membership.

I have studied theoretical philospohy at one of the most prestigious universities in this country. But your sophisms about everyday expressions would nonetheless be called "mashed snow" by most Swedes, including me.

[The Member Formerly Known As Sophist]

What about "yellow snow"? 

[TheoK]

What about "yellow snow"? 

[Blasted]

At least when men gossip, they focus on more interesting things than girls do.  Either that or I've just spent too much time around women in my lifetime and gotten prejudiced :lol:

[Adam]

Men can be bitchy and gossippy yeah, but women are a lot worse in my experience

[Parts]

Get men alone and the bitching begins

[Phlexor]

Most men, who are simple creatures to be honest, bitch about real shit that manages to get in their way of just being left alone. From what I've seen personally, women will bitch to destroy other women who have fallen foul of their group.

Let the flaming begin, you know who you are.

Plus to GA, most men, who lit wants to label as real, want to fuck said 24y.o women do so because they are compelled to by genetics and evolution. They get a nice big pay off for keeping the species alive. So way to help out with the species dude(ette?)...