Fucking KILL Quatermass

[ῦ]

Let me just place some more emphasis on this;

[Scrapheap]

Excuse me, what were you trying to say??

[ῦ]

Well there's times when I draw the line too. Like everytime he brings up fucking small children.

Did he bring up fucking small children here??

I was responding to this.

[Scrapheap]

Well there's times when I draw the line too. Like everytime he brings up fucking small children.

Did he bring up fucking small children here??

I was responding to this.

Oh, I know Callaway is hypersensitive about the subject.

I don't see a problem with fucking post-pubescent girls though. If it bleeds, it breeds!!

[Al Swearegen]

Well there's times when I draw the line too. Like everytime he brings up fucking small children.

Did he bring up fucking small children here??

I was responding to this.

Oh, I know Callaway is hypersensitive about the subject.

I don't see a problem with fucking post-pubescent girls though. If it bleeds, it breeds!!

Very delicately put.

[Scrapheap]

Oh, I know Callaway is hypersensitive about the subject.

I don't see a problem with fucking post-pubescent girls though. If it bleeds, it breeds!!

Very delicately put.

I strive to achieve the sublime. 

[Celticgoddess]

Oh, I know Callaway is hypersensitive about the subject.

I don't see a problem with fucking post-pubescent girls though. If it bleeds, it breeds!!

Very delicately put.

I strive to achieve the sublime. 

Dude, girls can get their periods at ages 10-12. Let's raise the standards slightly and strive for legal please?

[Callaway]

Oh, I know Callaway is hypersensitive about the subject.

I don't see a problem with fucking post-pubescent girls though. If it bleeds, it breeds!!

Very delicately put.

I strive to achieve the sublime. 

Dude, girls can get their periods at ages 10-12. Let's raise the standards slightly and strive for legal please?

I have heard of young girls who start puberty even younger than that, but that's close to the average.

[Celticgoddess]

Oh, I know Callaway is hypersensitive about the subject.

I don't see a problem with fucking post-pubescent girls though. If it bleeds, it breeds!!

Very delicately put.

I strive to achieve the sublime. 

Dude, girls can get their periods at ages 10-12. Let's raise the standards slightly and strive for legal please?

I have heard of young girls who start puberty even younger than that, but that's close to the average.

Yeah, I know of a woman whos daugters started at age 8 and thought of that as I typed my response but it made me shudder. Little girls shouldn't have to deal with the hormonal uproar and the physical distress from an event like that at such a young age. 

[Frolic_Fun]

The youngest so far from what I've heard to go into puberty was 5 years old.

[Celticgoddess]

I was at a medical conference awhile back and they were investing a lot of money into researching the effects various chemicals are having on the bodies of young girls. I know parabens are a culprit for various issues.

[McGiver]

some guest is printing this topic right now.

can bots print topics?

[Parts]

some guest is printing this topic right now.

can bots print topics?

They just hit the buttons they don't print them

[Callaway]

some guest is printing this topic right now.

can bots print topics?

The print button here just puts the whole topic into a printable format with no pictures, etc.

[Al Swearegen]

Quatermass butthurt 

Quatermass wrote:
I find it wonderful that, the moment we lose our moderation privileges, how swiftly the membership shows their gratitude to our service. Or at least, I hope, a minority.

When we moderate, we do it for the good of the forum as a whole. I take a utilitarian approach to moderation. That means the strongest amount of good to the most amount of people. If other people are disruptive, and continue to do so, well, we will ban them. This, first and foremost, is a support site for people with AS, not a shooting range or a chance to show off that you or your opinion is foremost amongst all others.

And this is how you treat us in return? You disgust me. Pathetic, petty little minds who cannot get over slights either imagined or exaggerated as justification for doing what you want, regardless of how others feel. You are poor examples of the human race as a whole, regardless of whether or not you have Asperger's, autism, or are an NT.

I wrote:
You Quartermass, are a souped up, righteous little prat. You have this by reputation and it comes through in flying colours here.

You think that your services ought to be greeted with streamer and wolf whistles?

Why ARE your mod powers taken away? Chances are because YOU or one of your mod friends can not be trusted. What's more YOU seem to not be in a position to have helped avert such a position. It is not the only time the mods here have been called into question is it. Far from it. There is however little members can do to address things individually when a mod takes a "utilitarian approach to moderation". That very concept is full of belief that YOU personally have the best interests and intellect for making a lot of crappy decisions that occur through poor moderation.

Tell me about the effectiveness of the mods around Oct 2005. Slight issue with a young man called William Freund. Tell me about "strongest amount of good?"

"You disgust me"? "You are poor examples of the human race" Sit the hell down Princess and hope that you can prove yourself worthy in future to be respected by members here. Where you are sitting now is outside the Principals office whilst he investigates you and your other staff members. You MAY avoid punishment but it is hardly a position of self--righteousness and acting in the interests of all you should be adopting.

Members here have every reason to be angry with you and the mods that have let this board down. A bit of humility is what you need.

Quatermass wrote:
Humility? You are one to talk. I was not a moderator at around the time of the William Freund incident. I wasn't even a member. I was made a moderator two years later, around March 2007. Get your facts right before you make completely baseless accusations.

The way you people act, just because you don't get your own way, thinking of yourselves first and others second...I gave you so many chances to improve, and you use them thinking, 'he'll never do it. We're entitled to be on this board because we're Aspies'. Wrong. You are only entitled to be on this board as long as you followed the rules. THIS. IS. A. PRIVATE. BBS. It is designed for support first and foremost. But it doesn't mean that we will support a single person's opinion to the detriment of all others. We try to support as many people as possible. But that doesn't mean you get to be an idiot or a malicious little sod with impunity.


We try not to take things personally, but you lot...that's all you ever do. That's all you ever will. All about you, because you believe that you are the only people in the world that matter. Wake up to yourselves, or vacate the premises. Either way, stop disrupting the BBS.

I wrote:
Quatermass you can stop bossing people around any time you like. You are ineffectual and impotent here.

Now as for baseless accusations, did I say you were part of the particular moderation team around the William Freund incident? No I did refer to your unilateral approach as ineffective in consideration of that particular nasty episode of WP history. It signifies that when mistakes are made there is often drastic consequences even if the mods consider themselves working for the good of the community like you delude yourself you do.

You are taking things VERY personally and I can not see who you are trying to kid here. It sure is not us. I don't believe I am the only person in the world and be very bloody careful of who you designate as "you lot" because it sounds suspiciously like "you members who disagree with me". Not really the sign of a good mod.

Not that I ever thought you were. There are some great mods here. Amoung which is Mr Mark and GBollard and DW_A_Mum. You are not of that standard and with crappy attitudes like you display here, never likely to be.

Here is another thing to consider just between you me and any member who accesses this. Everyone here (By and large) is on the spectrum. We all almost to a person dislike change and this is a BIG one. We are venting in a few select threads in one single subforum. Therapeutic and natural. You though seem to jump on people here and call them what? "You are poor examples of the human race". You are a pretty poor standard of human yourself aren't you? No that was not rhetorical.

I think you need a little time out QM and a self-righteous readjustment. You are clearly unstable, emotional and no good for this place and if you were not completely up yourself you would know this to be true.

Quatermass wrote:
You're the one bullying once you have obtained a position of perceived strength. I am merely defending myself and the other mods. If I am doing a poor job of doing so, then so be it, but nobody attacks me with impunity. Whether I am doing a good job as a moderator is up to Alex to decide. Not me. Not you. All I can do is try and improve myself. But I will not take destructive criticism from the likes of you.

This thread is over.

Then he locked the thread and waved his fist at the computer moniter and cried