Young Children

[earthboundmisfit]

Jesus tap-dancing christ, it shouldn't even have to be in the TOS. Do people really need to be told specifically not to post CP?

[Parts]

Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.

So how long has he been sucking you dick fuck face

[earthboundmisfit]

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.

Jesus dude, give it a rest. Quit trying to make this about whatever grievance you have with the U.S.

[Christopher McCandless]

Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.

I agree - though international law needs to go a lot further. People need to not be penalised for having ideas and expressing them, there should be severe punishments for anyone who uses their power to suppress free candid conversations. Hence why I think a few school shootings targeting bullies isnt entirely a bad idea.

[P7PSP]

Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.

Fuck you and fuck the UN. I don't want blue beanie fuckers in my country.

[Callaway]

Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.

You may not like it, but our host is located in the US and therefore subject to US law, TCO.

We are bound to honor our host's TOS, since if we don't then they could take the site down.

Posting child porn as well as soliciting someone to post child porn violates our TOS, since child porn is against US law.  

However I think that child porn is against the law in almost every country, so even if we were bound to follow international law, it would still be illegal.

[The_Chosen_One]

Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.

You may not like it, but our host is located in the US and therefore subject to US law, TCO.

We are bound to honor our host's TOS, since if we don't then they could take the site down.

Posting child porn as well as soliciting someone to post child porn violates our TOS, since child porn is against US law.  

However I think that child porn is against the law in almost every country, so even if we were bound to follow international law, it would still be illegal.

All I'm saying is that asking about whether someone had it happen and discussing it isn't actually violating any rule. Posting images and links to sites and also engaging in child porn itself is against the law, but freedom of speech still applies. The whole thing is arbitrary and subjective.

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Anyway, the person who started it is gone, so it's virtually a moot point.

[RageBeoulve]

Seems like it.

BTW, how many actually DO read the fucking TOS's of ANY site they log into? Same as when you download and install a program you just hit the 'I agree' button. If anyone actually says yes, then I'd be fucking surprised.....

Its not Odeon's TOS - its Hostgator's. Unfortunately the US constitution does not extend to websites.

Tells you something about the US constitution, doesn't it. Considering the net is a worldwide phenomenon, international law should apply to everything posted. BTW, as some prats might think I am advocating this bullshit, I have said that I'm AGAINST child por or porn itself. I* am more pissed of in the fact that a DISCUSSION without LINKS AND IMAGES is stifled because of some worry that it violates some arbitrary rule. Discussing a subject is fine under any law, we are not in 1930s Germany. Advocating that people undertake the activity is a different thing.

You may not like it, but our host is located in the US and therefore subject to US law, TCO.

We are bound to honor our host's TOS, since if we don't then they could take the site down.

Posting child porn as well as soliciting someone to post child porn violates our TOS, since child porn is against US law.  

However I think that child porn is against the law in almost every country, so even if we were bound to follow international law, it would still be illegal.

All I'm saying is that asking about whether someone had it happen and discussing it isn't actually violating any rule. Posting images and links to sites and also engaging in child porn itself is against the law, but freedom of speech still applies. The whole thing is arbitrary and subjective.

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Anyway, the person who started it is gone, so it's virtually a moot point.

Are you comparing making pornography with consenting adults to making child pornography?

[earthboundmisfit]

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Are you fucking kidding me?

[The_Chosen_One]

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Are you fucking kidding me?

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Do I look like I'm kidding, dickwad?

[RageBeoulve]

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Are you fucking kidding me?

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Do I look like I'm kidding, dickwad?

Child porn and constenting adults making porn cannot be compared with each other. You're either trolling, or you have no grip on reality whatsoever. I suggest you tell your therapist about this.

[earthboundmisfit]

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Yes. Ball licking. Good stuff.

Perfectly fine according to the TOS.

[RageBeoulve]

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Are you fucking kidding me?

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Do I look like I'm kidding, dickwad?

Oh yeah. Ball licking. So?

[The_Chosen_One]

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Are you fucking kidding me?

Site Direction -> Pointing Out The Obvious pp 3 & 4.

Do I look like I'm kidding, dickwad?

Child porn and constenting adults making porn cannot be compared with each other. You're either trolling, or you have no grip on reality whatsoever. I suggest you tell your therapist about this.

It seems pretty hypocritical to ban issues on child sex, which is abhorrent, yet freely post porn which still violates the TOS of ANY fucking site.
It's you cunts who need to get a grip on reality, instead of playing with yerselves all day.

Why do you think porn sites are being shut down? Because the authorities firnd it offensive and they don't see a difference between kiddie porn, gay porn and ordinary.

Hey, I don't write the fucking rules, but they are there, so it's either one out, all out, or quit fucking whining.

Go see your own therapist, asshole, and suck him off while you are there.

[Callaway]

All I'm saying is that asking about whether someone had it happen and discussing it isn't actually violating any rule. Posting images and links to sites and also engaging in child porn itself is against the law, but freedom of speech still applies. The whole thing is arbitrary and subjective.

Also, if child porn is not tolerated, which it isn't, then why are images of ordinary porn allowed?

Anyway, the person who started it is gone, so it's virtually a moot point.

Ordinary porn is not illegal and involves consenting adults, while child porn is illegal and involves children who aren't old enough to sign a contract or give consent.