"If it looks like a , and quacks like a , we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands." - Douglas Adams (English Writer) 1952-2001
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
He's been very paranoid in the past about people quoting his words, because he doesn't want to be caught in a lie. He freely deletes his own posts and those of others he thinks will cause him trouble.A good way to take him down, when somebody eventually does, will be to go around to all the people who've been slighted by him, gather any chat logs and written records they have, cross reference it all, and publicize it. If Alex hasn't changed from the way he used to be, that will reveal glaring inconsistences, evasions, and outright lies all over the place.
You'll never self-actualize the subconscious canopy of stardust with that attitude.
The thing that gets me (well, one of them) is that if there were a better replacement, they would already have stepped up and become successful. Instead, Intensity is it. It fills a niche but it's not speaking to the UN. If there's a vacuum, what exactly is the nature of it?
Quote from: Pyraxis on January 10, 2009, 05:59:27 PMThe thing that gets me (well, one of them) is that if there were a better replacement, they would already have stepped up and become successful. Instead, Intensity is it. It fills a niche but it's not speaking to the UN. If there's a vacuum, what exactly is the nature of it?Well no Wrong Planet and as most of the members either don't have a clue or have the inclination to come here, something has to fill the gap. It would probably end up being AFF I fear.
Would you really want a lot of them here. Some are okay but most
Quote from: New Labour on January 10, 2009, 06:17:23 PMQuote from: Pyraxis on January 10, 2009, 05:59:27 PMThe thing that gets me (well, one of them) is that if there were a better replacement, they would already have stepped up and become successful. Instead, Intensity is it. It fills a niche but it's not speaking to the UN. If there's a vacuum, what exactly is the nature of it?Well no Wrong Planet and as most of the members either don't have a clue or have the inclination to come here, something has to fill the gap. It would probably end up being AFF I fear.Would you really want a lot of them here. Some are okay but most
So you don't like AP/Wp.ZOMG LETS FLAME THE MEMBERS THERE NOW!
Quote from: Fionæ on January 10, 2009, 06:24:21 PMSo you don't like AP/Wp.ZOMG LETS FLAME THE MEMBERS THERE NOW!Did Alex offer to make you a moderator or something?
Quote from: New Labour on January 10, 2009, 06:25:46 PMQuote from: Fionæ on January 10, 2009, 06:24:21 PMSo you don't like AP/Wp.ZOMG LETS FLAME THE MEMBERS THERE NOW!Did Alex offer to make you a moderator or something?No. I'm taking flaming of the "majority of members there suck" because that is biased.
Quote from: Fionæ on January 10, 2009, 06:27:42 PMQuote from: New Labour on January 10, 2009, 06:25:46 PMQuote from: Fionæ on January 10, 2009, 06:24:21 PMSo you don't like AP/Wp.ZOMG LETS FLAME THE MEMBERS THERE NOW!Did Alex offer to make you a moderator or something?No. I'm taking flaming of the "majority of members there suck" because that is biased. Well most of them would not get along here, lets face it. There are some good members there.
Quote from: New Labour on January 10, 2009, 06:29:00 PMQuote from: Fionæ on January 10, 2009, 06:27:42 PMQuote from: New Labour on January 10, 2009, 06:25:46 PMQuote from: Fionæ on January 10, 2009, 06:24:21 PMSo you don't like AP/Wp.ZOMG LETS FLAME THE MEMBERS THERE NOW!Did Alex offer to make you a moderator or something?No. I'm taking flaming of the "majority of members there suck" because that is biased. Well most of them would not get along here, lets face it. There are some good members there. Actually I wouldn't say "most" whine. There are a few whiners, I don't tend to read their posts anyway. The majority of the posts I read are fine. How do you define a whiner? Moaning about life? Well, it is a support site.