Ahh fuck it. Ask ol rage something while you're at it.

[odeon]

Yes, you're the one who can't let go, or you wouldn't get so defensive about what I'm saying here. I haven't put the whole thing behind me, but "the whole thing" is about a lot more than you, Odeon, so take your head out of your ass. By moving here, and asking a different question (what are some of the strategies behind disclosure of information?) I am getting closer to the answer I'm looking for than I was by pointing fingers at you.

You, also, have an established pattern of pursuing disagreements ad nausem. I don't know if you expected me to just close my inconvenient mouth or what, but on this issue that'll be a long time coming. So unless we manage to agree to disagree and stop setting off each other's hackles, this'll keep happening, until I finally manage to make my position clear and understand yours.

At that point it'll likely becomes evident that the whole thing was a misunderstanding all along, but if that turns out to not be the case, yes, I will continue to argue for what I believe in.

What exactly is your accusation, anyway, and what are you trying to accomplish by coming here?

Coming here? As in I2? As in Rage's ask-away thread?

I don't expect you to do anything, Pyraxis, I'm replying to your posts here. This is Intensity. If I read something I want to reply to, I reply to it. I'm not pursuing disagreements per se, I'm reading what I want to read and replying to what I want to reply to.

Your pattern is pretty much in evidence here, too, the way you always react to forum drama, especially the kind where you don't know as much as you'd like to. Your assumption then seems always to be that since you don't know everything, the powers that be are doing something they shouldn't, that they are abusing their powers. It's not an accusation, exactly, it's more of an observation.

Could I be getting it all wrong? Of course. Happens to me all the time. But I notice you didn't even touch your previous statement, "I don't want to make things worse until I'm certain I've gotten my own crap out of the picture". Maybe I got it wrong, maybe you don't mean what you say, but you're not in the habit of being as sloppy as that. Makes me think that you know exactly what you're doing.

Haha. I do understand that burning curiosity of her though, big O. When I don't know something... I wantsssss it. 

Its an addiction man. Comes from reading to many books and spending too much time searching for things on the internets.

Yes, well, I guess I can understand it, too.

[RageBeoulve]

Yes, you're the one who can't let go, or you wouldn't get so defensive about what I'm saying here. I haven't put the whole thing behind me, but "the whole thing" is about a lot more than you, Odeon, so take your head out of your ass. By moving here, and asking a different question (what are some of the strategies behind disclosure of information?) I am getting closer to the answer I'm looking for than I was by pointing fingers at you.

You, also, have an established pattern of pursuing disagreements ad nausem. I don't know if you expected me to just close my inconvenient mouth or what, but on this issue that'll be a long time coming. So unless we manage to agree to disagree and stop setting off each other's hackles, this'll keep happening, until I finally manage to make my position clear and understand yours.

At that point it'll likely becomes evident that the whole thing was a misunderstanding all along, but if that turns out to not be the case, yes, I will continue to argue for what I believe in.

What exactly is your accusation, anyway, and what are you trying to accomplish by coming here?

Coming here? As in I2? As in Rage's ask-away thread?

I don't expect you to do anything, Pyraxis, I'm replying to your posts here. This is Intensity. If I read something I want to reply to, I reply to it. I'm not pursuing disagreements per se, I'm reading what I want to read and replying to what I want to reply to.

Your pattern is pretty much in evidence here, too, the way you always react to forum drama, especially the kind where you don't know as much as you'd like to. Your assumption then seems always to be that since you don't know everything, the powers that be are doing something they shouldn't, that they are abusing their powers. It's not an accusation, exactly, it's more of an observation.

Could I be getting it all wrong? Of course. Happens to me all the time. But I notice you didn't even touch your previous statement, "I don't want to make things worse until I'm certain I've gotten my own crap out of the picture". Maybe I got it wrong, maybe you don't mean what you say, but you're not in the habit of being as sloppy as that. Makes me think that you know exactly what you're doing.

Haha. I do understand that burning curiosity of her though, big O. When I don't know something... I wantsssss it. 

Its an addiction man. Comes from reading to many books and spending too much time searching for things on the internets.

Yes, well, I guess I can understand it, too.

 

[Pyraxis]

Odeon - yeah, the "until" was intentional, 'cause I'm still suspicious. Join the club, though - I'm not completely trusting of most people. It's just paranoia.

I don't really know what it means to be a good leader, and how much should be public and how much shouldn't, and how to spot abuse of power. That's what I'm learning.

[RageBeoulve]

Odeon - yeah, the "until" was intentional, 'cause I'm still suspicious. Join the club, though - I'm not completely trusting of most people. It's just paranoia.

I don't really know what it means to be a good leader, and how much should be public and how much shouldn't, and how to spot abuse of power. That's what I'm learning.

Key word- LEARNING.

Thats never a bad thing. Ever. 

[Pyraxis]

Trial and error is (perhaps unfortunately for some?) a good way to learn.

Better than not trying and drowning in the theoretical, at least.

[odeon]

Odeon - yeah, the "until" was intentional, 'cause I'm still suspicious. Join the club, though - I'm not completely trusting of most people. It's just paranoia.

I don't really know what it means to be a good leader, and how much should be public and how much shouldn't, and how to spot abuse of power. That's what I'm learning.

Fair enough--I won't pursue this further. Thanks for the explanation.

[Blasted]

Do you want those gloves?  Finished the blanket and need a new knitting project   If yes, I need you to measure your hands for me

[RageBeoulve]

Do you want those gloves?  Finished the blanket and need a new knitting project   If yes, I need you to measure your hands for me

You're gonna make gloves for me? Ok well.. how do I measure my hands? Like the length of each finger?

[Blasted]

Measure the circumference of your wrist, length from wrist bone to middle/longest finger and the length of your thumb

[RageBeoulve]

Measure the circumference of your wrist, length from wrist bone to middle/longest finger and the length of your thumb

K one sec.

[RageBeoulve]

Measure the circumference of your wrist, length from wrist bone to middle/longest finger and the length of your thumb

Ok. Wrist circumference: six inches

      Wrist bone to middle finger: 8 inches

      Thumb: 2 and a half inches

[Blasted]

No chance of getting that in cms?   Am too lazy to convert it

[P7PSP]

No chance of getting that in cms?   Am too lazy to convert it

2.54 cm = 1".

[RageBeoulve]

No chance of getting that in cms?   Am too lazy to convert it

Hang on.

[RageBeoulve]

Wrist circumference: six inches                  =15.24 cm

      Wrist bone to middle finger: 8 inches   =20.32 cm    

      Thumb: 2 and a half inches                =6.35 cm



I think.... I mean if i'm wrong I hope one of you smart aspies corrects it. Lol.