I had a really funny joke... but auto correct ruined the lunchtime.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
firstly, i love the mod. it is a good way to read what made a positive or negative impression on others.secondly, i wish that members would stop writing generic reasons why they applaud or smite other. why aren't the reasons given a little more entertaining?
Because if you come up with a really good reason, it behooves you to reply in-thread, where all can see it. Also, there's a character limit in the comment field, which some may find constraining.
Quote from: SleepyDragon on March 04, 2010, 05:36:09 PMBecause if you come up with a really good reason, it behooves you to reply in-thread, where all can see it. Also, there's a character limit in the comment field, which some may find constraining.i have noticed these constraints. it has forced me, at times to be creative. it has also forced me to be concise. concise is something that i have a problem with.
Quote from: McMorrison on March 04, 2010, 06:09:45 PMQuote from: SleepyDragon on March 04, 2010, 05:36:09 PMBecause if you come up with a really good reason, it behooves you to reply in-thread, where all can see it. Also, there's a character limit in the comment field, which some may find constraining.i have noticed these constraints. it has forced me, at times to be creative. it has also forced me to be concise. concise is something that i have a problem with.Yet you refuse to read stuff if it is lengthy. Is there not some hypocrisy here?
Quote from: Christopher McCandless on March 04, 2010, 06:16:00 PMQuote from: McMorrison on March 04, 2010, 06:09:45 PMQuote from: SleepyDragon on March 04, 2010, 05:36:09 PMBecause if you come up with a really good reason, it behooves you to reply in-thread, where all can see it. Also, there's a character limit in the comment field, which some may find constraining.i have noticed these constraints. it has forced me, at times to be creative. it has also forced me to be concise. concise is something that i have a problem with.Yet you refuse to read stuff if it is lengthy. Is there not some hypocrisy here?you would think.what i mean by concise is giving one clear instruction. i tend to use too many wordsay the be frt or thirty to say what i could have in 20 characters or less.
Quote from: McMorrison on March 04, 2010, 06:20:55 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on March 04, 2010, 06:16:00 PMQuote from: McMorrison on March 04, 2010, 06:09:45 PMQuote from: SleepyDragon on March 04, 2010, 05:36:09 PMBecause if you come up with a really good reason, it behooves you to reply in-thread, where all can see it. Also, there's a character limit in the comment field, which some may find constraining.i have noticed these constraints. it has forced me, at times to be creative. it has also forced me to be concise. concise is something that i have a problem with.Yet you refuse to read stuff if it is lengthy. Is there not some hypocrisy here?you would think.what i mean by concise is giving one clear instruction. i tend to use too many wordsay the be frt or thirty to say what i could have in 20 characters or less.I know what you mean - I used to find that difficult. But my degree has taught me how to be a lot more laconic, over time.
Quote from: Christopher McCandless on March 04, 2010, 06:21:54 PMQuote from: McMorrison on March 04, 2010, 06:20:55 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on March 04, 2010, 06:16:00 PMQuote from: McMorrison on March 04, 2010, 06:09:45 PMQuote from: SleepyDragon on March 04, 2010, 05:36:09 PMBecause if you come up with a really good reason, it behooves you to reply in-thread, where all can see it. Also, there's a character limit in the comment field, which some may find constraining.i have noticed these constraints. it has forced me, at times to be creative. it has also forced me to be concise. concise is something that i have a problem with.Yet you refuse to read stuff if it is lengthy. Is there not some hypocrisy here?you would think.what i mean by concise is giving one clear instruction. i tend to use too many wordsay the be frt or thirty to say what i could have in 20 characters or less.I know what you mean - I used to find that difficult. But my degree has taught me how to be a lot more laconic, over time. at work when i need something to happen i have difficulty giving clear concise instructions. i tend to ramble.when teaching my kids a lesson i tend to lecture.i hate this about me.i want to be a man of few words.
Quote from: McMorrison on March 04, 2010, 06:28:42 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on March 04, 2010, 06:21:54 PMQuote from: McMorrison on March 04, 2010, 06:20:55 PMQuote from: Christopher McCandless on March 04, 2010, 06:16:00 PMQuote from: McMorrison on March 04, 2010, 06:09:45 PMQuote from: SleepyDragon on March 04, 2010, 05:36:09 PMBecause if you come up with a really good reason, it behooves you to reply in-thread, where all can see it. Also, there's a character limit in the comment field, which some may find constraining.i have noticed these constraints. it has forced me, at times to be creative. it has also forced me to be concise. concise is something that i have a problem with.Yet you refuse to read stuff if it is lengthy. Is there not some hypocrisy here?you would think.what i mean by concise is giving one clear instruction. i tend to use too many wordsay the be frt or thirty to say what i could have in 20 characters or less.I know what you mean - I used to find that difficult. But my degree has taught me how to be a lot more laconic, over time. at work when i need something to happen i have difficulty giving clear concise instructions. i tend to ramble.when teaching my kids a lesson i tend to lecture.i hate this about me.i want to be a man of few words.Take a few seconds to think through exactly you want to say before saying anything would be my advice. If you watch any great orator, this is exactly what they do. Or they stall by other means.
^I have the same, which is why most of my posts are short. I forget most of what I wanted to say.