Author Topic: Nuclear Power  (Read 2515 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Icequeen

  • News Box Slave
  • Insane Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 12027
  • Karma: 2031
  • Gender: Female
  • I peopled today.
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #60 on: October 31, 2016, 02:07:13 PM »
They have potential but right now, they are nowhere near nuclear power. And most likely won't be. Fission is more powerful by magnitudes than anything else. Well, until they learn how to control fusion.

Someone needs to channel Tesla. :meditate:

Offline Jack

  • Reiterative Utterance of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 14550
  • Karma: 0
  • You don't know Jack.
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #61 on: October 31, 2016, 04:02:53 PM »
batteries
The environmental repercussions of mining for materials, recycling, and disposing of batteries ranks them at the top of world pollutants.

Offline Gopher Gary

  • sockpuppet alert!
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *
  • Posts: 12680
  • Karma: 652
  • I'm not wearing pants.
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #62 on: October 31, 2016, 09:33:37 PM »
 :zoinks:

:gopher:

Offline 'andersom'

  • Pure Chocolate Bovine PIMP of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 39199
  • Karma: 2556
  • Gender: Female
  • well known as hyke.
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #63 on: November 01, 2016, 02:58:53 AM »
They have potential but right now, they are nowhere near nuclear power. And most likely won't be. Fission is more powerful by magnitudes than anything else. Well, until they learn how to control fusion.

Someone needs to channel Tesla. :meditate:

 :agreed:

* sets her self next to IQ, at an appropriate distance * :meditate:
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108911
  • Karma: 4482
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #64 on: November 01, 2016, 11:55:38 AM »
They have potential but right now, they are nowhere near nuclear power. And most likely won't be. Fission is more powerful by magnitudes than anything else. Well, until they learn how to control fusion.

Someone needs to channel Tesla. :meditate:

 :agreed:

* sets her self next to IQ, at an appropriate distance * :meditate:

Me too, me too!

:meditate:
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein

Offline 'andersom'

  • Pure Chocolate Bovine PIMP of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 39199
  • Karma: 2556
  • Gender: Female
  • well known as hyke.
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #65 on: November 01, 2016, 12:58:18 PM »
batteries
The environmental repercussions of mining for materials, recycling, and disposing of batteries ranks them at the top of world pollutants.

Batteries or other ways to store energy. Stored hydrogen won by electrolysis does not have to be as dangerous as assumed, apparently. Would not be a top pollutant.
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!

Offline Gopher Gary

  • sockpuppet alert!
  • Maniacal Postwhore
  • *
  • Posts: 12680
  • Karma: 652
  • I'm not wearing pants.
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #66 on: November 01, 2016, 07:40:43 PM »
They have potential but right now, they are nowhere near nuclear power. And most likely won't be. Fission is more powerful by magnitudes than anything else. Well, until they learn how to control fusion.

Someone needs to channel Tesla. :meditate:

 :agreed:

* sets her self next to IQ, at an appropriate distance * :meditate:

Me too, me too!

:meditate:

I heard he's dead.  :zoinks:

*shoots spitballs at the closed eyed spirit guides*  :whistle:
:gopher:

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108911
  • Karma: 4482
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #67 on: November 02, 2016, 01:43:09 PM »
batteries
The environmental repercussions of mining for materials, recycling, and disposing of batteries ranks them at the top of world pollutants.

Batteries or other ways to store energy. Stored hydrogen won by electrolysis does not have to be as dangerous as assumed, apparently. Would not be a top pollutant.

You still have to charge them.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein

Offline Lestat

  • Pharmaceutical dustbin of the autie elite
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 8965
  • Karma: 451
  • Gender: Male
  • Homo stercore veteris, heterodiem
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #68 on: November 02, 2016, 11:33:37 PM »
Using combination of solar, tidal, hydro and thermoelectric power generation plus that available from rivers to prepare hyrides and use those for fuel, as well as direct methanol fuel cells and microbial fuel cells would help.
Beyond the pale. Way, way beyond the pale.

Requiescat in pacem, Wolfish, beloved of Pyraxis.

Offline 'andersom'

  • Pure Chocolate Bovine PIMP of the Aspie Elite
  • Elder
  • Almighty Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 39199
  • Karma: 2556
  • Gender: Female
  • well known as hyke.
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #69 on: November 03, 2016, 04:41:28 AM »
batteries
The environmental repercussions of mining for materials, recycling, and disposing of batteries ranks them at the top of world pollutants.

Batteries or other ways to store energy. Stored hydrogen won by electrolysis does not have to be as dangerous as assumed, apparently. Would not be a top pollutant.

You still have to charge them.

Solar energy, via electrolysis stored in a hydrogen/oxigen "battery". Decentralized energy making. Every household/apartment-complex becomes an energy producing unit. 
I can do upside down chocolate moo things!

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108911
  • Karma: 4482
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #70 on: November 03, 2016, 03:03:14 PM »
batteries
The environmental repercussions of mining for materials, recycling, and disposing of batteries ranks them at the top of world pollutants.

Batteries or other ways to store energy. Stored hydrogen won by electrolysis does not have to be as dangerous as assumed, apparently. Would not be a top pollutant.

You still have to charge them.

Solar energy, via electrolysis stored in a hydrogen/oxigen "battery". Decentralized energy making. Every household/apartment-complex becomes an energy producing unit. 

Sure, and it wouldn't be anywhere near enough.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein

Offline Lestat

  • Pharmaceutical dustbin of the autie elite
  • Elder
  • Obsessive Postwhore
  • *****
  • Posts: 8965
  • Karma: 451
  • Gender: Male
  • Homo stercore veteris, heterodiem
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #71 on: November 05, 2016, 03:56:41 PM »
What about massive sulfuric acid/vanadium based redox cells? those are rechargable with sulfuric acid addition, and we have access to plentiful sulfuric, sulfuric di- and trioxide, from volcanic fumaroles etc.


I am given to favouring a combined approach, including tidal generators, river-mouth redox devices, wind and solar farms, with lenses focused on  the solar cells, and using cell material that can take infra-red, in the near IR range.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2016, 03:59:33 PM by Lestat »
Beyond the pale. Way, way beyond the pale.

Requiescat in pacem, Wolfish, beloved of Pyraxis.

Offline odeon

  • Witchlet of the Aspie Elite
  • Webmaster
  • Postwhore Beyond Repair
  • *****
  • Posts: 108911
  • Karma: 4482
  • Gender: Male
  • Replacement Despot
Re: Nuclear Power
« Reply #72 on: November 05, 2016, 05:36:42 PM »
It's certainly interesting when compared to some other technologies, but you still need to charge them.

Nuclear power is beyond them. Please complete basic quantum physics and get back to me.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

- Albert Einstein