INTENSITY²

Start here => What's your crime? Basic Discussion => Topic started by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 05:08:22 AM

Title: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 05:08:22 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?

Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Lucifer on August 16, 2007, 05:15:24 AM
generically, i have to agree.  however, when it becomes specific (i.e. a bloke who's my lover), then i find them very attractive.  association with the person, rather than an abstract aesthetic, i believe.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Soph on August 16, 2007, 05:15:43 AM
I don't think it's abnormal. I've heard other girls say that as well.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 16, 2007, 05:22:03 AM
I quote Elaine from Seinfeld:

"The female body is a work of art. The male body is utilitarian. It's for gettin' around. It's like a Jeep."
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 05:27:23 AM
Guys tend to assume we love looking at them naked because they love looking at us naked.

Lucifer - True -  but I haven't been mutually attracted to someone like that before.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Lucifer on August 16, 2007, 05:28:30 AM
i agree with both points there, FM.  it's be interesting to see how, and even if, your views change when/if you do become attracted in that way, eh?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 05:35:24 AM
i agree with both points there, FM.  it's be interesting to see how, and even if, your views change when/if you do become attracted in that way, eh?

One could only hope :)
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: purposefulinsanity on August 16, 2007, 05:36:44 AM
I don't find looking at random cocks a turn on, but I do think there can be something aesthetically pleasing about them.  If there is some kind of sexual connection there, no matter how brief, that can be a different story.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Peter on August 16, 2007, 05:55:57 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?

Didn't you say ages ago that you were sad that you didn't think you'd get a cock to suck on again?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 05:58:27 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?

Didn't you say ages ago that you were sad that you didn't think you'd get a cock to suck on again?

Probably. I was in emo mode. Why are you bringing this up about a year after it was said?

Sucking a dick doesn't have to mean I jerk off to pictures of dicks.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: McGiver on August 16, 2007, 06:07:08 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?

Didn't you say ages ago that you were sad that you didn't think you'd get a cock to suck on again?

Probably. I was in emo mode. Why are you bringing this up about a year after it was said?

Sucking a dick doesn't have to mean I jerk off to pictures of dicks.
do you jerk off to pictures of girls?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 06:09:28 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?

Didn't you say ages ago that you were sad that you didn't think you'd get a cock to suck on again?

Probably. I was in emo mode. Why are you bringing this up about a year after it was said?

Sucking a dick doesn't have to mean I jerk off to pictures of dicks.
do you jerk off to pictures of girls?

I don't jerk off to pictures - period.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: McGiver on August 16, 2007, 06:16:23 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?

Didn't you say ages ago that you were sad that you didn't think you'd get a cock to suck on again?

Probably. I was in emo mode. Why are you bringing this up about a year after it was said?

Sucking a dick doesn't have to mean I jerk off to pictures of dicks.
do you jerk off to pictures of girls?

I don't jerk off to pictures - period.  :laugh:
oh, i see.

,you imagine yourself laying on the straw in a barn and some hero comes in riding a stallion and takes you into his arms, inside, on a rug made of fur next to a blazing fire.....
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 06:22:19 AM
I'm anti hunting.  :P
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 06:23:30 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly; same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?



I find this statement to be an oxymoron. How can you even be attracted to males if they're devoid of aesthetics?

HB -- "This boner looks rank, but I'll suck it anyway! ;)"

:P
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Peter on August 16, 2007, 06:26:52 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?

Didn't you say ages ago that you were sad that you didn't think you'd get a cock to suck on again?

Probably. I was in emo mode. Why are you bringing this up about a year after it was said?

Sucking a dick doesn't have to mean I jerk off to pictures of dicks.

It seemed to imply that you liked something about them.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Lucifer on August 16, 2007, 06:27:14 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?



I find this statement to be an oxymoron. How can you even be attracted to males if they're devoid of aesthetics?

most men don't walk round bollock naked all the time, pea.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 06:28:08 AM
i dont know why girls are so uptight about nudie pics, i always think hey if i was a girl and hot, wouldnt you want to see me butt naked? this is the formula i use everytime when i post noodz
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Soph on August 16, 2007, 06:30:06 AM
hey if i was a girl and hot, wouldnt you want to see me butt naked?
Yes.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 06:30:45 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly; same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?



I find this statement to be an oxymoron. How can you even be attracted to males if they're devoid of aesthetics?

HB -- "This boner looks rank, but I'll suck it anyway! ;)"

:P

Oh my god, typical male answer.  It's not all about peoples bits for women. I like being hugged by someone large and strong, Kissed by someone I'm attracted to (and attraction is not all about the look of peoples bodies.)

Quote
It seemed to imply that you liked something about them.

Well, mostly it's peer pressure, and the part i like about it is pleasuring men. Not actually doing the sucking. It doesn't get me off.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 06:31:11 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?



I find this statement to be an oxymoron. How can you even be attracted to males if they're devoid of aesthetics?

most men don't walk round bollock naked all the time, pea.  :laugh:

Still a contradiction though -- what HB said.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 06:31:46 AM
hey if i was a girl and hot, wouldnt you want to see me butt naked?
Yes
just close your eyes and pretend im seven of nine from star trek when you look at my noodz :)
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 06:33:21 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly; same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?



I find this statement to be an oxymoron. How can you even be attracted to males if they're devoid of aesthetics?

HB -- "This boner looks rank, but I'll suck it anyway! ;)"

:P

Oh my god, typical male answer.  It's not all about peoples bits for women. I like being hugged by someone large and strong, Kissed by someone I'm attracted to (and attraction is not all about the look of peoples bodies.)

Quote
It seemed to imply that you liked something about them.

Well, mostly it's peer pressure, and the part i like about it is pleasuring men. Not actually doing the sucking. It doesn't get me off.

Don't play the gender argument with me; what you stated in your introduction puzzled the fuck out of me because it's an oxymoron, which is like saying you need to be cruel to be kind.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Peter on August 16, 2007, 06:35:35 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly. Same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?



I find this statement to be an oxymoron. How can you even be attracted to males if they're devoid of aesthetics?

most men don't walk round bollock naked all the time, pea.  :laugh:

A fact for which I am eternally grateful.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 06:35:59 AM
I don't get off from looking at naked men was my point.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 06:36:40 AM
hale_bopp please! >:( :laugh:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 06:40:30 AM
I don't get off from looking at naked men was my point.

Do you even wear a blindfold?  :-\
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Peter on August 16, 2007, 06:49:48 AM
Aren't there particularly attractive guys who are aesthetically pleasing?  Not every guy looks like this:

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 06:51:19 AM
hahaha damn son, that chains off the hook!!

 :P
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 06:52:30 AM
Aren't there particularly attractive guys who are aesthetically pleasing?  Not every guy looks like this:

hahahhaah, lol. I would crack up laughing if he stripped off in front of me.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: McGiver on August 16, 2007, 06:54:16 AM
I'm anti hunting.  :P
i imagine a favio type from a romance novel sweeping you away in your fantasy wanks.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 06:56:00 AM
you know halebopp always struck me as the type of gal that fancied a good romance novel
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 06:57:54 AM
you know halebopp always struck me as the type of gal that fancied a good romance novel

She always struck me as high-maintenance.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: mordok on August 16, 2007, 06:59:59 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly; same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?



I find this statement to be an oxymoron. How can you even be attracted to males if they're devoid of aesthetics?

HB -- "This boner looks rank, but I'll suck it anyway! ;)"

:P

Oh my god, typical male answer.  It's not all about peoples bits for women. I like being hugged by someone large and strong, Kissed by someone I'm attracted to (and attraction is not all about the look of peoples bodies.)

Quote
It seemed to imply that you liked something about them.

Well, mostly it's peer pressure, and the part i like about it is pleasuring men. Not actually doing the sucking. It doesn't get me off.

Don't play the gender argument with me; what you stated in your introduction puzzled the fuck out of me because it's an oxymoron, which is like saying you need to be cruel to be kind.

How is it contradictory in any way?  There's a lot more to attraction than mere appearance.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 07:00:19 AM
well when you look good you can be high maintenance, it doesnt bother me
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 07:03:38 AM
you know halebopp always struck me as the type of gal that fancied a good romance novel

She always struck me as high-maintenance.

Richards guess was closer. Why would I be high maintenence?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 07:05:30 AM
you know halebopp always struck me as the type of gal that fancied a good romance novel

She always struck me as high-maintenance.

Richards guess was closer. Why would I be high maintenence?

Because you bitch about men here all the damn time.

Well, not all the time, but mostly.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 07:06:17 AM
i wanna see halebopps tight ass :laugh:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 07:07:16 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly; same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?



I find this statement to be an oxymoron. How can you even be attracted to males if they're devoid of aesthetics?

HB -- "This boner looks rank, but I'll suck it anyway! ;)"

:P

Oh my god, typical male answer.  It's not all about peoples bits for women. I like being hugged by someone large and strong, Kissed by someone I'm attracted to (and attraction is not all about the look of peoples bodies.)

Quote
It seemed to imply that you liked something about them.

Well, mostly it's peer pressure, and the part i like about it is pleasuring men. Not actually doing the sucking. It doesn't get me off.

Don't play the gender argument with me; what you stated in your introduction puzzled the fuck out of me because it's an oxymoron, which is like saying you need to be cruel to be kind.

How is it contradictory in any way?  There's a lot more to attraction than mere appearance.

I know that, but nearly every relationship is born from physical aesthetics. 'Tis human nature.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 07:07:42 AM
you know halebopp always struck me as the type of gal that fancied a good romance novel

She always struck me as high-maintenance.

Richards guess was closer. Why would I be high maintenence?

Because you bitch about men here all the damn time.

Well, not all the time, but mostly.

And that means that I make them buy me things, and they have to drive flash cars?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 07:08:11 AM
i wanna see halebopps tight ass :laugh:

She won't; she's high maintenance; she's outta our leagues.

:(
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: mordok on August 16, 2007, 07:09:51 AM
Ok, Girls: Do you enjoy looking at knobs? I personally find them rather ugly; same with male bodies. Is anyone in the same boat or am I just abnormal?



I find this statement to be an oxymoron. How can you even be attracted to males if they're devoid of aesthetics?

HB -- "This boner looks rank, but I'll suck it anyway! ;)"

:P

Oh my god, typical male answer.  It's not all about peoples bits for women. I like being hugged by someone large and strong, Kissed by someone I'm attracted to (and attraction is not all about the look of peoples bodies.)

Quote
It seemed to imply that you liked something about them.

Well, mostly it's peer pressure, and the part i like about it is pleasuring men. Not actually doing the sucking. It doesn't get me off.

Don't play the gender argument with me; what you stated in your introduction puzzled the fuck out of me because it's an oxymoron, which is like saying you need to be cruel to be kind.

How is it contradictory in any way?  There's a lot more to attraction than mere appearance.

I know that, but nearly every relationship is born from physical aesthetics. 'Tis human nature.

This is becoming less true in the internet age.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 07:10:23 AM
you know halebopp always struck me as the type of gal that fancied a good romance novel

She always struck me as high-maintenance.

Richards guess was closer. Why would I be high maintenence?

Because you bitch about men here all the damn time.

Well, not all the time, but mostly.

And that means that I make them buy me things, and they have to drive flash cars?

High maintenance isn't limited to material things or status preferences. It can also apply to an impoverished female who would do the guy's head in with her constant moans and such.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 07:10:47 AM
that doesnt necessarly mean shes high maintenance pea, maybe shes a private person or something. personally i have no embarress button at all, i'll post pictures of anything

Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 07:12:30 AM
you know halebopp always struck me as the type of gal that fancied a good romance novel

She always struck me as high-maintenance.

Richards guess was closer. Why would I be high maintenence?

Because you bitch about men here all the damn time.

Well, not all the time, but mostly.

And that means that I make them buy me things, and they have to drive flash cars?

High maintenance isn't limited to material things or status preferences. It can also apply to an impoverished female who would do the guy's head in with her constant moans and such.

So because I vent here, I would complain constantly to someone i'm dating and crazy about??
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 07:13:42 AM
that doesnt necessarly mean shes high maintenance pea, maybe shes a private person or something. personally i have no embarress button at all, i'll post pictures of anything



I didn't say that she's high maintenance, I said that she comes across as someone who would do my head in -- a high-maintenance person. And I didn't state that my opinions are inherently true.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: McGiver on August 16, 2007, 07:21:25 AM
that doesnt necessarly mean shes high maintenance pea, maybe shes a private person or something. personally i have no embarress button at all, i'll post pictures of anything



I didn't say that she's high maintenance, I said that she comes across as someone who would do my head in -- a high-maintenance person. And I didn't state that my opinions are inherently true.
i think you have a crush on her, pea.

and you just like getting attention from her.

why don't you just act polite with her, you might like the responses you get in return alot more.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 07:23:02 AM
She's good-looking in her own right, but I don't have a crush on her. I tend to avoid that bollocks online now.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: McGiver on August 16, 2007, 07:25:07 AM
She's good-looking in her own right, but I don't have a crush on her. I tend to avoid that bollocks online now.
suit yourself.  but the way you are acting may keep you from making a good friend. :-\
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: The_P on August 16, 2007, 07:33:44 AM
She's good-looking in her own right, but I don't have a crush on her. I tend to avoid that bollocks online now.
suit yourself.  but the way you are acting may keep you from making a good friend. :-\

I made some effort with her on MSN last year, but due to our different time-zones and lack of common interests, it was short-lived. I'm not holding that against her because that's how it happens when you try to make overtures of friendship with other people -- not everyone may return the favour. Nothing personal.

People will like you, people will hate you, you like some, you hate others. That's how it works in an imperfect world.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: DirtDawg on August 16, 2007, 07:49:33 AM
Aren't there particularly attractive guys who are aesthetically pleasing?  Not every guy looks like this:
I love the title of the pic.

* hairy_beach_dude_for_jesus

:LMAO:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 07:50:13 AM
haha oh shit
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: DirtDawg on August 16, 2007, 07:50:52 AM
Aren't there particularly attractive guys who are aesthetically pleasing?  Not every guy looks like this:

hahahhaah, lol. I would crack up laughing if he stripped off in front of me.

Good point on the difference between men and women. I cracked up just looking at the picture.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: QuirkyCarla on August 16, 2007, 08:25:33 AM
Penises are fugly. I don't know how anyone can find a naked man attractive.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Peter on August 16, 2007, 08:45:27 AM
Does anyone find these men attractive?

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: purposefulinsanity on August 16, 2007, 08:49:38 AM
Penises are fugly. I don't know how anyone can find a naked man attractive.

I wouldn't say penis are fugly, some actually look quite nice :laugh:   A naked pic of either sex on its own isn't enough for me to wank over (I'd rather seem some action), but I think naked men can be just as pleasing to look at as naked women.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Kiriana on August 16, 2007, 08:50:49 AM
Those photos are nicely done but they don't turn me on or anything.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: vodz on August 16, 2007, 08:50:55 AM
Does anyone find these men attractive?

Numbers 2 and 4.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: mordok on August 16, 2007, 08:52:43 AM
Does anyone find these men attractive?

All except the last one.  Never been too keen on the heavily muscled look.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: richard on August 16, 2007, 08:52:56 AM
Penises are fugly. I don't know how anyone can find a naked man attractive.
I wouldn't say penis are fugly, some actually look quite nice :laugh:
heres your oppurtunity to do me :laugh:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: El on August 16, 2007, 09:27:58 AM
Does anyone find these men attractive?
The first one, yes.  The second might be if he didn't look like he was made of frickin' plastic.  The third guy's face is obscured so I can't tell (and what the hell is he pulling off?  A dress?  Is he a drag queen and the face is tiltled back to hide the makeup???); the fourth guy, no.

I quote Elaine from Seinfeld:

"The female body is a work of art. The male body is utilitarian. It's for gettin' around. It's like a Jeep."

Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 16, 2007, 09:39:57 AM
Does anyone find these men attractive?
The first one, yes.  The second might be if he didn't look like he was made of frickin' plastic.  The third guy's face is obscured so I can't tell (and what the hell is he pulling off?  A dress?  Is he a drag queen and the face is tiltled back to hide the makeup???); the fourth guy, no.

I quote Elaine from Seinfeld:

"The female body is a work of art. The male body is utilitarian. It's for gettin' around. It's like a Jeep."

Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
If you need a lab rat Ms Molly, you let me know.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Lucifer on August 16, 2007, 10:41:39 AM
Does anyone find these men attractive?

nope.  apart from anything else, they've shaved the most interesting bit.

anyway, a lot of the attractiveness for me is sensual (in the true sense of the word) - the smell and feel.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: El on August 16, 2007, 10:58:41 AM
Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
If you need a lab rat Ms Molly, you let me know.

Let me just go grab a condom and an informed consent...
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 16, 2007, 12:43:32 PM
Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
If you need a lab rat Ms Molly, you let me know.

Let me just go grab a condom and an informed consent...
Oh... an informed consent form... so this could get dangerous.   :eyebrows:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Calandale on August 16, 2007, 01:12:21 PM
Does anyone find these men attractive?

They're pretty enough, but I'm not aroused by
them.

As to the original question, I don't know that
I particularly find other penises all that compelling.
I'm not disgusted by them though, and kinda curious
enough to probably enjoy watching one orgasm close
up, but it doesn't mean anything to me.

My wife was absolutely disgusted by the thought of men
and especially of the penis. She found me something less
manly, and was attracted. Eventually, she grew quite attached
to my penis.

Other women I've been with have been kind of a mix.
Most seem to not mind them too much though.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Calandale on August 16, 2007, 01:14:48 PM
The third guy's face is obscured so I can't tell (and what the hell is he pulling off?  A dress?

I rather found him the most interesting.
Mainly for the pose.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Peter on August 16, 2007, 01:17:59 PM
Does anyone find these men attractive?

They're pretty enough, but I'm not aroused by
them.

As to the original question, I don't know that
I particularly find other penises all that compelling.
I'm not disgusted by them though, and kinda curious
enough to probably enjoy watching one orgasm close
up, but it doesn't mean anything to me.

My wife was absolutely disgusted by the thought of men
and especially of the penis. She found me something less
manly, and was attracted. Eventually, she grew quite attached
to my penis.

Other women I've been with have been kind of a mix.
Most seem to not mind them too much though.

Your wife liked that you're a girlyman?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: El on August 16, 2007, 01:25:45 PM
Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
If you need a lab rat Ms Molly, you let me know.

Let me just go grab a condom and an informed consent...
Oh... an informed consent form... so this could get dangerous.   :eyebrows:

Sounds kinkier than it necessarily is.  Nowadays you have to fill out an informed consent to fill out a survey that involves nothing but circling a number on a Likert 1-7 scale.

So, tell me, on a scale of 1-7, how freaky do you want it to get?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Calandale on August 16, 2007, 01:34:13 PM


Your wife liked that you're a girlyman?

That's a way it could be put,
I suppose.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 16, 2007, 01:39:11 PM
Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
If you need a lab rat Ms Molly, you let me know.

Let me just go grab a condom and an informed consent...
Oh... an informed consent form... so this could get dangerous.   :eyebrows:

Sounds kinkier than it necessarily is.  Nowadays you have to fill out an informed consent to fill out a survey that involves nothing but circling a number on a Likert 1-7 scale.

So, tell me, on a scale of 1-7, how freaky do you want it to get?
With 7 being Calandale?  2π.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: McGiver on August 16, 2007, 02:02:07 PM
some penis' are cute.  given the opportunity i would really like to suck a cute cock.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Eclair on August 16, 2007, 02:14:54 PM
Pick photo number one.  I think the photo's would be sexier if the penis was hard and ready to go.
When they are soft, it just looks to me like the guy is in cuddle mode, which I don't really equate to sex.

Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Peter on August 16, 2007, 02:28:41 PM
Pick photo number one.  I think the photo's would be P.I.ier if the penis was hard and ready to go.
When they are soft, it just looks to me like the guy is in cuddle mode, which I don't really equate to P.I..



But surely the guy would get hard during the cuddling?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Eclair on August 16, 2007, 02:48:51 PM
Pick photo number one.  I think the photo's would be P.I.ier if the penis was hard and ready to go.
When they are soft, it just looks to me like the guy is in cuddle mode, which I don't really equate to P.I..



But surely the guy would get hard during the cuddling?

Yes, but we are talking about a visual turn on. 
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Calandale on August 16, 2007, 03:06:08 PM

With 7 being Calandale?  2π.

I'm not that freaky. Just curious how things
will feel.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: El on August 16, 2007, 08:15:47 PM
Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
If you need a lab rat Ms Molly, you let me know.

Let me just go grab a condom and an informed consent...
Oh... an informed consent form... so this could get dangerous.   :eyebrows:

Sounds kinkier than it necessarily is.  Nowadays you have to fill out an informed consent to fill out a survey that involves nothing but circling a number on a Likert 1-7 scale.

So, tell me, on a scale of 1-7, how freaky do you want it to get?
With 7 being Calandale?  2π.
You used an option that wasn't intended to be used by the original maker of the survey.  You just fucked up my experiment.  I want nothing more to do with you.  I'll take my duct tape, whipped cream, riding crop, and live chicken elsewhere, thank you.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Alex179 on August 16, 2007, 08:17:59 PM
You use a live chicken?   Hmmm.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: El on August 16, 2007, 08:22:07 PM
You use a live chicken?   Hmmm.

Erotic is using a feather.  Kinky is using the whole chicken.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Alex179 on August 16, 2007, 08:23:54 PM
You use a live chicken?   Hmmm.

Erotic is using a feather.  Kinky is using the whole chicken.

Kinky it is.   More impressed that you use a live one.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 16, 2007, 10:08:29 PM
Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
If you need a lab rat Ms Molly, you let me know.

Let me just go grab a condom and an informed consent...
Oh... an informed consent form... so this could get dangerous.   :eyebrows:

Sounds kinkier than it necessarily is.  Nowadays you have to fill out an informed consent to fill out a survey that involves nothing but circling a number on a Likert 1-7 scale.

So, tell me, on a scale of 1-7, how freaky do you want it to get?
With 7 being Calandale?  2π.
You used an option that wasn't intended to be used by the original maker of the survey.  You just fucked up my experiment.  I want nothing more to do with you.  I'll take my duct tape, whipped cream, riding crop, and live chicken elsewhere, thank you.
Can we at least fry up the chicken and have dinner?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Alex179 on August 16, 2007, 10:10:26 PM
Can we at least fry up the chicken and have dinner?

Original recipe or extra spicy?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: mordok on August 16, 2007, 10:11:11 PM
Can we at least fry up the chicken and have dinner?

Who's gonna' choke the chicken?
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Mr Smith on August 16, 2007, 11:12:26 PM
Penises are ugly. I find none of those guys bodies attractive. It looks like they've got an overcooked savoloy hanging off their front.  :puke:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: El on August 17, 2007, 06:22:22 AM
Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
If you need a lab rat Ms Molly, you let me know.

Let me just go grab a condom and an informed consent...
Oh... an informed consent form... so this could get dangerous.   :eyebrows:

Sounds kinkier than it necessarily is.  Nowadays you have to fill out an informed consent to fill out a survey that involves nothing but circling a number on a Likert 1-7 scale.

So, tell me, on a scale of 1-7, how freaky do you want it to get?
With 7 being Calandale?  2π.
You used an option that wasn't intended to be used by the original maker of the survey.  You just fucked up my experiment.  I want nothing more to do with you.  I'll take my duct tape, whipped cream, riding crop, and live chicken elsewhere, thank you.
Can we at least fry up the chicken and have dinner?

Sorry; I'm a vegetarian.

Now, if you'd be up for eating the chicken yourself while I eat CHEESECAKE...
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: DirtDawg on August 17, 2007, 06:51:58 AM
Can we at least fry up the chicken and have dinner?

Who's gonna' choke the chicken?

We'll leave that for your talented moves.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 17, 2007, 09:28:07 AM
Plus.  A hundred thousand fucking times, if I could.  I always want to quote that when something like this comes into question.

And my own comment:  No, I don't find genetalia specifically attractive.  What I find attractive as far as the male body goes, you could show in a PG movie.  However, I might add that on the idea of the male body being utilitarian/function being a priority, I'd imagine that if something was repeatedly paired with pleasure, I'd probably wind up enjoying the sight of it, or at the very least, the thought of it.  Simple classical conditioning.  (This is only a hypothesis, though.  I should probably try and test it at some point.  As a scientist.)
If you need a lab rat Ms Molly, you let me know.

Let me just go grab a condom and an informed consent...
Oh... an informed consent form... so this could get dangerous.   :eyebrows:

Sounds kinkier than it necessarily is.  Nowadays you have to fill out an informed consent to fill out a survey that involves nothing but circling a number on a Likert 1-7 scale.

So, tell me, on a scale of 1-7, how freaky do you want it to get?
With 7 being Calandale?  2π.
You used an option that wasn't intended to be used by the original maker of the survey.  You just fucked up my experiment.  I want nothing more to do with you.  I'll take my duct tape, whipped cream, riding crop, and live chicken elsewhere, thank you.
Can we at least fry up the chicken and have dinner?

Sorry; I'm a vegetarian.

Now, if you'd be up for eating the chicken yourself while I eat CHEESECAKE...
You're on.  A whole chicken for me, a whole cheesecake for you.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: El on August 17, 2007, 09:46:18 AM
You're on.  A whole chicken for me, a whole cheesecake for you.
The problem is, if you are what you eat, afterward I'll look twenty or thirty pounds heavier but be totally into having my photo taken in very little clothing- but you'll be too nervous to be able to follow through.  :P
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 17, 2007, 10:10:04 AM
You're on.  A whole chicken for me, a whole cheesecake for you.
The problem is, if you are what you eat, afterward I'll look twenty or thirty pounds heavier but be totally into having my photo taken in very little clothing- but you'll be too nervous to be able to follow through.  :P
You assume I'm not already.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: El on August 17, 2007, 10:50:12 AM
You're on.  A whole chicken for me, a whole cheesecake for you.
The problem is, if you are what you eat, afterward I'll look twenty or thirty pounds heavier but be totally into having my photo taken in very little clothing- but you'll be too nervous to be able to follow through.  :P
You assume I'm not already.

Hmm.  Damn my irrepresible optimism.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 17, 2007, 12:34:38 PM
You're on.  A whole chicken for me, a whole cheesecake for you.
The problem is, if you are what you eat, afterward I'll look twenty or thirty pounds heavier but be totally into having my photo taken in very little clothing- but you'll be too nervous to be able to follow through.  :P
You assume I'm not already.

Hmm.  Damn my irrepresible optimism.
I do cook a mean cheesecake though.  It's all about managing the heat and moisture...   :eyelash:
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 17, 2007, 01:03:31 PM
I just noticed that you had a Cafepress store.  I'll have to pick something out, I've got some cafepress cash kickin around.  :)
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: El on August 17, 2007, 01:05:08 PM
I just noticed that you had a Cafepress store.  I'll have to pick something out, I've got some cafepress cash kickin around.  :)

Bitchin', if you see anything you like, that is.  Every so often they shoot me a check.  :D
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Tesla on August 17, 2007, 02:04:16 PM
I just noticed that you had a Cafepress store.  I'll have to pick something out, I've got some cafepress cash kickin around.  :)

Bitchin', if you see anything you like, that is.  Every so often they shoot me a check.  :D
Yeah I get a check every so often.  I like how they hold onto the money as long as possible, send you all kinds of emails trying to get you to spend the money before they cut you a check.   ::)

It's a great way to make some extra money though.  It's completely free too, which is awesome.  I actually was supposed to declare my Cafepress earnings on my taxes last year.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Randy on August 17, 2007, 02:28:16 PM
Honestly, I keep seeing this thread girls on girls.
Title: Re: Guys and Girls....
Post by: Calandale on August 17, 2007, 03:29:20 PM
  I'll take my duct tape, whipped cream, riding crop, and live chicken elsewhere, thank you.

Be careful, you're beginning to sound like me.