INTENSITY²

Start here => Games => Topic started by: Peter on February 09, 2007, 10:36:59 AM

Title: Flame warriors
Post by: Peter on February 09, 2007, 10:36:59 AM
Which people correspond to which warriors? (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/)

RobertN: Rebel without a clue (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_74.php) and lonely guy (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_14.php).

Flo: Loopy (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_45.php) and garble (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_79.php) (though less so these days).
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: The_P on February 09, 2007, 10:40:29 AM
The Jekyll and Hyde persona -- that's me without a doubt!
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: El on February 09, 2007, 01:50:49 PM
I can't be arsed to figure out which one I am.  I read thruogh the whole thing a long time ago and don't want to take the time to do it again.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: The_P on February 09, 2007, 02:03:19 PM
I view Calloway as this: http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_23.php
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Pyraxis on February 09, 2007, 02:16:29 PM
I dunno, doesn't Nomaken have more of a reputation for that one?

I say Callaway's Eagle Scout to the core.

I'm probably some kind of cross between Diplomat and Ego.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Callaway on February 09, 2007, 02:34:32 PM
The Jekyll and Hyde persona -- that's me without a doubt!

You need to mix the Grammarian in too, P:

http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_30.php

And I don't even have a cat!    :laugh:

I think Pyraxis has me pegged.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: The_P on February 09, 2007, 03:00:24 PM
The Jekyll and Hyde persona -- that's me without a doubt!

You need to mix the Grammarian in too, P:

http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_30.php



+1
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Litigious on February 09, 2007, 03:46:20 PM
Me (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_64.php)?
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Pyraxis on February 09, 2007, 03:52:24 PM
Aren't you more like this? (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_27.php)
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Litigious on February 09, 2007, 03:55:19 PM
Maybe. Thanks.  8)
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: renaeden on February 11, 2007, 11:08:49 PM
I am probably closest to Bliss Ninny. Everything is just great on the Internet! ;D

I commented to GA on what he might be, he has since walked off in a huff.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Callaway on February 11, 2007, 11:23:06 PM
I am probably closest to Bliss Ninny. Everything is just great on the Internet! ;D

I commented to GA on what he might be, he has since walked off in a huff.

I think you might be closer to the Peacemaker (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_35.php).

Which one did you think GalileoAce might be?  Kung Fu Master (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_21.php)?   ;)

Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: QuirkyCarla on February 11, 2007, 11:40:17 PM
none of them sound like me so far  :'(
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on February 12, 2007, 07:13:10 AM
(http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/rebel.jpg)
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: QuirkyCarla on February 12, 2007, 10:17:00 AM
that's not a very flattering photo of you
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Scrapheap on April 08, 2007, 09:44:23 PM
I think I found Litigious (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_38.php)  :laugh:

Of couse this could be me too.  ;) :laugh:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Litigious on April 09, 2007, 02:10:39 AM
 :laugh:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 09, 2007, 02:35:03 PM
I think I found Litigious (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_38.php)  :laugh:

Of couse this could be me too.  ;) :laugh:
the unibrow looks just like emmonn.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: El on April 09, 2007, 06:55:06 PM
I think I only fit with syncophant.  :/
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: renaeden on April 15, 2007, 08:54:27 PM
I think you might be closer to the Peacemaker (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_35.php).

Which one did you think GalileoAce might be?  Kung Fu Master (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_21.php)?   ;)
Thankyou, Peacemaker is cool. I think the only way I have of "pouring oil on troubled waters" though, is being a complete thread-killer. And then everyone forgets what they were angry about.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Callaway on April 15, 2007, 09:02:20 PM
I think you might be closer to the Peacemaker (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_35.php).

Which one did you think GalileoAce might be?  Kung Fu Master (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_21.php)?   ;)
Thankyou, Peacemaker is cool. I think the only way I have of "pouring oil on troubled waters" though, is being a complete thread-killer. And then everyone forgets what they were angry about.

I see you diplomatically side-stepped saying which one you thought GalileoAce was.   :green:

And I think I am more of a thread slayer than you are.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 15, 2007, 09:15:10 PM
i have killed more threads than the pebbles of sand on the beach.

yet i keep trying....
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Calandale on April 15, 2007, 09:22:48 PM
Watch out, or the rampant thread re-animator will strike.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 15, 2007, 09:24:19 PM
i always appreciate new members for ressurecting dead threads.

there actually are quite alot of great threads on this forum.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on April 15, 2007, 09:26:08 PM
I think you might be closer to the Peacemaker (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_35.php).

Which one did you think GalileoAce might be?  Kung Fu Master (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_21.php)?   ;)
Thankyou, Peacemaker is cool. I think the only way I have of "pouring oil on troubled waters" though, is being a complete thread-killer. And then everyone forgets what they were angry about.

I see you diplomatically side-stepped saying which one you thought GalileoAce was.   :green:

And I think I am more of a thread slayer than you are.

I'm probably more of a Philosopher (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_16.php) ;)  But there is a little bit of the Kung Fu Master within me. :)
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Scrapheap on April 16, 2007, 09:55:07 AM
i always appreciate new members for ressurecting dead threads.

there actually are quite alot of great threads on this forum.


Ahem .... I was the one wo ressurected this........ I get bored because nobody posts at the same time I do, so I end up going through the old threads.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 16, 2007, 02:25:17 PM
there are several threads in anti philosophy and the sex mature forums.

hint, hint.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Pyraxis on April 16, 2007, 02:26:29 PM
Why don't you go resurrect them yourself, you lazy ass?
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 16, 2007, 02:28:15 PM
Why don't you go resurrect them yourself, you lazy ass?
after 20k plus threads, i think i have probably offered my opinions in them.

nice try though.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 18, 2007, 07:35:00 AM
several threads in the anti philosophy, and sex forums.
several
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on April 18, 2007, 07:40:32 AM
Stop it  :laugh:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 18, 2007, 07:41:56 AM
ok.

but i have an angle here.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Scrapheap on April 18, 2007, 08:01:40 AM
ok.

but i have an angle here.

or possibly diarrhea of the mouth.  :laugh:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 18, 2007, 08:05:16 AM
trust me.....
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Callaway on April 18, 2007, 09:31:00 AM
I think I only fit with syncophant.  :/

Maybe Philosopher (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_16.php)?

I wanted to say Therapist (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_24.php), but the description is not quite right.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on April 19, 2007, 01:14:05 AM
trust me.....

Trust you?  :GA:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: El on April 19, 2007, 06:03:13 AM
I think I only fit with syncophant.  :/

Maybe Philosopher (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_16.php)?

I wanted to say Therapist (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_24.php), but the description is not quite right.

Maybe, but I'm not that good and I'm usually too lazy to post even on the rare occasion that I have a substantial opinion on something.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 19, 2007, 07:06:24 AM
trust me.....

Trust you?  :GA:
sure.

it may take a while, but i always repay in dividends.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on April 19, 2007, 07:15:18 AM
But: :GA:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: McGiver on April 19, 2007, 07:15:59 AM
it'll come.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on July 07, 2009, 09:55:37 AM
I think you might be closer to the Peacemaker (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_35.php).

Which one did you think GalileoAce might be?  Kung Fu Master (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_21.php)?   ;)
Thankyou, Peacemaker is cool. I think the only way I have of "pouring oil on troubled waters" though, is being a complete thread-killer. And then everyone forgets what they were angry about.

I see you diplomatically side-stepped saying which one you thought GalileoAce was.   :green:

And I think I am more of a thread slayer than you are.

I'm probably more of a Philosopher (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_16.php) ;)  But there is a little bit of the Kung Fu Master within me. :)


(Thread Necroing!)

I'm definitely the Philosopher.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: earthboundmisfit on July 17, 2009, 03:52:47 AM

Randy - http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_79.php

or this one? http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_45.php
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on July 17, 2009, 04:02:02 AM
A little from column A.....
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Frolic_Fun on July 17, 2009, 04:27:00 AM
I think you might be closer to the Peacemaker (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_35.php).

Which one did you think GalileoAce might be?  Kung Fu Master (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_21.php)?   ;)
Thankyou, Peacemaker is cool. I think the only way I have of "pouring oil on troubled waters" though, is being a complete thread-killer. And then everyone forgets what they were angry about.

I see you diplomatically side-stepped saying which one you thought GalileoAce was.   :green:

And I think I am more of a thread slayer than you are.

I'm probably more of a Philosopher (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_16.php) ;)  But there is a little bit of the Kung Fu Master within me. :)


(Thread Necroing!)

I'm definitely the Philosopher.

You're this:

http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_15.php

Myself:

http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_43.php
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on July 17, 2009, 04:28:34 AM
I think you might be closer to the Peacemaker (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_35.php).

Which one did you think GalileoAce might be?  Kung Fu Master (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_21.php)?   ;)
Thankyou, Peacemaker is cool. I think the only way I have of "pouring oil on troubled waters" though, is being a complete thread-killer. And then everyone forgets what they were angry about.

I see you diplomatically side-stepped saying which one you thought GalileoAce was.   :green:

And I think I am more of a thread slayer than you are.

I'm probably more of a Philosopher (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_16.php) ;)  But there is a little bit of the Kung Fu Master within me. :)


(Thread Necroing!)

I'm definitely the Philosopher.

You're this:

http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_15.php

"Philosopher differs from Profundus Maximus in that she actually does know something."
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Frolic_Fun on July 17, 2009, 04:33:55 AM
I beg to differ. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on July 17, 2009, 04:34:20 AM
Beg all you like.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: ProfessorFarnsworth on July 17, 2009, 05:05:24 AM
I'm the philosopher usually, but have tendencies of becoming a rebel leader or picador on a few occasions.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: renaeden on July 17, 2009, 05:28:40 AM
I have changed into a lamer:
http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_60.php
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on July 17, 2009, 05:36:40 AM
I have changed into a lamer:
http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_60.php

Lamer is a Warrior who appears in different guises to different people, and is therefore difficult to describe in full detail.
No comment here.

Nonetheless, he is readily identifiable because of his mediocre wit, utter lack of insight and vacuous comment.
Your comments are not vacuous. There are concise and efficient. And anything but devoid of meaning.

You begin to sense Lamer's presence when you are able to anticipate the content of his messages even before reading them.
I can't anticipate your posts. And I'm married to you.

Lamer actively participates in forum discourse and readily jumps into battle,
I wouldn't call you the most active member of this forum, and you rarely participate in battle....

but his ineffectuality renders him relatively harmless when encountered in single combat.
...but when you do participate you are anything but harmless.

Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: renaeden on July 17, 2009, 05:38:57 AM
That's what you think. :zoinks:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on July 17, 2009, 05:41:24 AM
I think this is the closest one...But you're not old.
http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_04.php
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on July 17, 2009, 05:42:06 AM
That's what you think. :zoinks:
:asthing:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Adam on July 17, 2009, 07:32:25 AM
I think I am this one

http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_60.php
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: renaeden on July 17, 2009, 07:33:48 AM
^That is what I said I am.

I think you are a lot more interesting than a lamer.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Adam on July 17, 2009, 07:35:37 AM
Hey I think YOU are more interestong than a lamer :agreed:

I tend to only be interesting to a couple of other equally-spazzy people  :laugh:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: Adam on July 17, 2009, 07:38:25 AM
I also recognise this guy in a few people on these AS sites :P

http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_14.php
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: renaeden on July 17, 2009, 07:46:30 AM
Hey I think YOU are more interestong than a lamer :agreed:

I tend to only be interesting to a couple of other equally-spazzy people  :laugh:
We have equal spazziness then. All  :agreed:

That Lonely Guy is everywhere. :D
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: El on July 17, 2009, 07:58:07 AM
I'm surprised nobody's called Callaway an Archivist (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_40.php) yet, given current contravercy in the callout forum.  (Else someone did and I missed it.)  I think eagle scout still fits better.

I don't know WTF I am anymore.   :laugh:
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: GalileoAce on July 17, 2009, 08:02:00 AM
I'm surprised nobody's called Callaway an Archivist (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_40.php) yet, given current contravercy in the callout forum.  (Else someone did and I missed it.)  I think eagle scout still fits better.

I didn't want to go there.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: El on July 17, 2009, 08:06:59 AM
I'm surprised nobody's called Callaway an Archivist (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_40.php) yet, given current contravercy in the callout forum.  (Else someone did and I missed it.)  I think eagle scout still fits better.

I didn't want to go there.
I figured if I brought it up from the "someone will bring it up" standpoint, it might keep it from being brought up with more of an edge.
Title: Re: Flame warriors
Post by: SleepyDragon on July 17, 2009, 08:08:36 AM
I have the occasional "Jekyll and Hyde" problem.  :evillaugh: