INTENSITY²

Start here => What's your crime? Basic Discussion => Topic started by: Adam on August 03, 2013, 12:24:54 AM

Title: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Adam on August 03, 2013, 12:24:54 AM

As to me not replying in ways you consider similar or relevant, No Adam, I know this comes as a shock and you think it perfectly reasonable for you to think I need to respond in ways that insult about things that are classified as similar to what...
I don't think you "need" to respond in any way I say. However you said yourself that you were "responding in kind." I pointed out that imo the two are totally different.

Quote
No. Insult me over things I think are not "on the table for discussions" and I will start lowballing too.
You've discussed your divorce plenty of times in the past. I also wasn't the first person to bring it up in relation to your strange views re: sexism.

Quote
I don't really care if you think it relevant or similar or worthy. Do not give a shit. The fact you made a song and dance and wanted to callout over is great.
What? Sorry. I don't understand that last bit. Made a song and dance over what? I said that your lame insults were detracting from the actual callout. I said the same thing about your caveman ramble. I don't think I made a song and dance about either. In fact, I couldn't care less about your trans/ocd insults if you actually got down to backing up your arguments and responded to the CALLOUT.

Quote
Going down this path lead to a situation that your partner in crime ended up wishing heart attack on me and accusing me of pedophilia. Something she could not walk away from and something you found a hard to slinking away from whilst saying "OK I WAS encouraging her and supporting hrer and acting like a dick, but I can't support this and please don't associate her actions with mine" and then left her holding the baby.

Bint has nothing to do with this. I have never accused you of paedophilia, so why bring this up? I left her holding the baby? Lol, for someone who was just recently accusing me of always siding by my friends, just becuase they're my friends, now you seem to be complaining about the opposite. Of course I didn't support her in calling you a paedophile.

Quote
Yes very 2010, better not start with that kind of shi or play innocent when you do. It comes off as dishonest and slimy.
Not start with this kind of shit? By making a comment taking the piss out of your divorce? I don't see how I have played innocent here. I'm more than happy to admit that I took the piss out of your divorce. Where's the dishonesty there?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 03, 2013, 05:35:31 AM
If I have to spell it out to you I will.
Jibes about my marriage or divorce or jibes over my kids are out of bounds and you actually know this. It is a shitty thing to insult someone over. So is making shitty comments over your transgenderism, life expectancy of your pets and the like.
They are all lowblow insults So lets not gloss around where I respond in kind with similar lowbrows. Lets not say that they ought not be said or somehow affect the call out or weaken my argument or replace my argument.

Similarly I will spell this out to you as you are acting stupid. In the day you and Bint became Bintsoph. You chased each other around like a pair of incontinent hyperactive puppies, spamming and shitting over threads. You were asked to stop. You laughed it off. You were being little shits. Eventually someone started posting shitty stuff at you two in return. Someone, look at me getting all mysterious, it was me). You guys countered and we were posting lowball after lowball until eventually after backing and laughing over each other's efforts, Bint  wrote something (in defence of you) about her thought that I was a paedophile. You then, though you had been her twin in the efforts up to that point and her loyal supporter and encouraged her to go further and further (and her you), suddenly you started backing away saying "I think that was too far".

So do we want to go down this pat? I thought that was all behind us, but IF you REALLY think that this is the way to go then yes I will respond in kind and be just as unreasonable and low and slimy and will inject it in any post I want.

Up to you Adam. Just knock off the playing stupid. You knew exactly what you were doing and when you got lowblows back do not act like my lowblows are out of line or that I have no place in saying them.

Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 05:40:06 AM
Bringing up stuff from... 2010?

Les, get over yourself.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 03, 2013, 05:44:06 AM
Fuck off you hairy little dwarf. ;)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Adam on August 03, 2013, 08:00:25 AM
Christ. :facepalm:

1. I never said I *didn't* know what I was doing. Yes, I made a low jibe at your divorce. And? I haven't denied that. I'm saying I disagree with you that it's the same as the trans jibes. Carry on making them or don't, I don't care. I'm just pointing out that they're not, as you claim, the same thing.

2. Once again, what Bint do was HER responsibility. I find it strange that you of al people are somehow trying to make me resonspible for what she did. Regardless of whether or not we were "working together" in the spamming etc, it was not me who made the paedophile insult.

3. Why are you bringing up jibes over your kids along with jibes about your marriage. You know as well as I do that I didn't make jobes about your kids
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 03, 2013, 08:12:08 AM
Christ. :facepalm:

1. I never said I *didn't* know what I was doing. Yes, I made a low jibe at your divorce. And? I haven't denied that. I'm saying I disagree with you that it's the same as the trans jibes. Carry on making them or don't, I don't care. I'm just pointing out that they're not, as you claim, the same thing.

2. Once again, what Bint do was HER responsibility. I find it strange that you of al people are somehow trying to make me resonspible for what she did. Regardless of whether or not we were "working together" in the spamming etc, it was not me who made the paedophile insult.

3. Why are you bringing up jibes over your kids along with jibes about your marriage. You know as well as I do that I didn't make jobes about your kids


1. Yes you disagree and I don't. I think it is same ballpark and I thought we were past that kind of shit. I thought we left that buried in 2010. If you are wanting to be a dickhead again and go through another round, I am ok with that. Would not have been my choice.
2. I do not make you responsible for her. I do not call you an innocent bystander either.
3. Same ballpark.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 08:28:25 AM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 03, 2013, 08:35:23 AM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

In fact I am doing the opposite. I am drawing a line in the sand and saying "This shit here, probably a good idea not to go there. If you do go there Adam then we both have danced to this tune before in 2010 and it got a little ugly. Let's not"
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Adam on August 03, 2013, 08:41:32 AM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

In fact I am doing the opposite. I am drawing a line in the sand and saying "This shit here, probably a good idea not to go there. If you do go there Adam then we both have danced to this tune before in 2010 and it got a little ugly. Let's not"

You're doing the opposite? Hahaha! You seriously believe that?
Come on, Les. I tried repeatedly to get you to actually stick to the call out. But you haven't.

I made a dig about your divorce in a separate thread, days ago.
I have since made a callout on a perfectly sensible subject and you came in with a load of random insults from three years ago. I foudn them kind of strange and suggested we focus on the callout. You then came back and responded only to that. Entirely ignoring the sexism issue.
Then you started talking about Bint and how she once called you a paedophile.

Um... ok.....?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 03, 2013, 08:49:27 AM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

Actually, you're shit stirring. I always see you joining in on these, trying to turn it into a gangbang. Not this time, faggot. This is none of your business, so fuck off.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Jack on August 03, 2013, 08:51:23 AM
I made a dig about your divorce in a separate thread, days ago.
I have since made a callout on a perfectly sensible subject and you came in with a load of random insults from three years ago. I foudn them kind of strange and suggested we focus on the callout. You then came back and responded only to that. Entirely ignoring the sexism issue.
Then you started talking about Bint and how she once called you a paedophile.

Um... ok.....?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Adam on August 03, 2013, 09:21:56 AM
Hey jack, what did you quote that for?

Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 03, 2013, 09:23:51 AM
Yeah.. kind of random huh?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Jack on August 03, 2013, 09:31:49 AM
Hey jack, what did you quote that for?

Truth. :laugh:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Jack on August 03, 2013, 09:40:23 AM
Hey jack, what did you quote that for?

Truth. :laugh:

Though the callout topic didn't die for it, so this argument is moot. Stop making callout threads in general discussion.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 09:51:04 AM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

In fact I am doing the opposite. I am drawing a line in the sand and saying "This shit here, probably a good idea not to go there. If you do go there Adam then we both have danced to this tune before in 2010 and it got a little ugly. Let's not"

Bullshit.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 09:51:35 AM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

Actually, you're shit stirring. I always see you joining in on these, trying to turn it into a gangbang. Not this time, faggot. This is none of your business, so fuck off.

I point out bullshit when I see it.

What are you doing?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 03, 2013, 10:05:23 AM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

In fact I am doing the opposite. I am drawing a line in the sand and saying "This shit here, probably a good idea not to go there. If you do go there Adam then we both have danced to this tune before in 2010 and it got a little ugly. Let's not"

Bullshit.

Nope. I dressed up the concept and I got a few jibes in first before Adam asked why I was doing what I was doing. But that is exactly what I was saying. If you can not see that then.....well fucked if I care really.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 03, 2013, 10:12:34 AM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

In fact I am doing the opposite. I am drawing a line in the sand and saying "This shit here, probably a good idea not to go there. If you do go there Adam then we both have danced to this tune before in 2010 and it got a little ugly. Let's not"

You're doing the opposite? Hahaha! You seriously believe that?
Come on, Les. I tried repeatedly to get you to actually stick to the call out. But you haven't.

I made a dig about your divorce in a separate thread, days ago.
I have since made a callout on a perfectly sensible subject and you came in with a load of random insults from three years ago. I foudn them kind of strange and suggested we focus on the callout. You then came back and responded only to that. Entirely ignoring the sexism issue.
Then you started talking about Bint and how she once called you a paedophile.

Um... ok.....?

You are not that stupid, so do not pretend to be or pretend that you can not see how it relates. OK?

Yes you did decide to do a lowblow insult something you have not tried since......
Think about it. I did respond to that and have continued to. Now you may have somehow consider that because you did not want those insults in the callout or that I should not be responding with insults still or in the callout.
I just don't much give a fuck.
So going back to when you decided last to try it on with those kind of insults and what kind of insults was I throwing at you then and where did it all culminate?
Yeah all pretty easy to join the dots. It is not all over the place and random and unable to be placed in context.

Don't pretend you are struggling with this. It is silly to pretend to be silly.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 03, 2013, 10:40:35 AM
Hey jack, what did you quote that for?

Truth. :laugh:

Though the callout topic didn't die for it, so this argument is moot. Stop making callout threads in general discussion.

Oooooh. I see.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Kapkao on August 03, 2013, 01:27:34 PM
(something about schleed being a faggot)

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTZ2URUI7sujAah8GycBebYfa515l0QlIP6BEnne-FKo7mFAsfw)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 03, 2013, 01:32:08 PM
(something about schleed being a faggot)

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTZ2URUI7sujAah8GycBebYfa515l0QlIP6BEnne-FKo7mFAsfw)

(http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmccho4dP81qblhcho1_500.jpg)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 03, 2013, 01:36:44 PM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

Actually, you're shit stirring. I always see you joining in on these, trying to turn it into a gangbang. Not this time, faggot. This is none of your business, so fuck off.

I point out bullshit when I see it.

What are you doing?

Standing up to a bully.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 01:50:47 PM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

Actually, you're shit stirring. I always see you joining in on these, trying to turn it into a gangbang. Not this time, faggot. This is none of your business, so fuck off.

I point out bullshit when I see it.

What are you doing?

Standing up to a bully.

I'm bullying now?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Pyraxis on August 03, 2013, 01:52:32 PM
Actually I'm curious, Rage, about this thing of schleed trying to turn callouts into gangbangs. I've seen him snipe mercilessly, sure, and respect nothing, but where's the gangbang part?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 03, 2013, 01:57:36 PM
Actually I'm curious, Rage, about this thing of schleed trying to turn callouts into gangbangs. I've seen him snipe mercilessly, sure, and respect nothing, but where's the gangbang part?

This isn't a callout, and that's my point. The guy likes it when people get mobbed.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 03, 2013, 01:58:29 PM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

Actually, you're shit stirring. I always see you joining in on these, trying to turn it into a gangbang. Not this time, faggot. This is none of your business, so fuck off.

I point out bullshit when I see it.

What are you doing?

Standing up to a bully.

I'm bullying now?

You are, because mind your own fucking business.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 02:02:13 PM
Using your logic, shouldn't you mind your own business too?

Piss off Ragey. Attention seek elsewhere.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 03, 2013, 02:39:04 PM
Using your logic, shouldn't you mind your own business too?

Piss off Ragey. Attention seek elsewhere.

Im not gonna leave you alone, schleed. You're not going to gang up on anyone else.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 02:41:49 PM
Are you getting a blowjob out of this?  :zoinks:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 03, 2013, 02:42:35 PM
Are you getting a blowjob out of this?  :zoinks:

I should, huh? :zoinks:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Adam on August 03, 2013, 02:51:21 PM
Don't pretend you are struggling with this. It is silly to pretend to be silly.

I think it's you who's struggling with this actually
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 02:55:20 PM
He struggles with keeping his posts to the point and under 1000 words. :laugh:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Adam on August 03, 2013, 03:20:11 PM
Tell me about it. I just replied to his last and I gotta say, I was losing the will to live by about half way through
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 03, 2013, 03:20:29 PM
Are you getting a blowjob out of this?  :zoinks:

Yup. ;)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Pyraxis on August 03, 2013, 03:58:13 PM
 :lol1:

It's a public forum. It's herding cats to get anybody to mind their own business.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 03, 2013, 04:05:23 PM
This happens more than you can imagine, Bulling is rabbit on these types of web sites, the parents either think its kids being kids or don't care, when several group up on one in any fashion its called a bulling , and any parent that thinks its "Kids being Kids" should not be aloud to be parents.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 04:19:27 PM
Are you getting a blowjob out of this?  :zoinks:

Yup. ;)

That explains everything.

I may draw the mental image in my head later and post it here. D:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: 'Butterflies' on August 03, 2013, 04:24:25 PM
Are you getting a blowjob out of this?  :zoinks:

Yup. ;)

That explains everything.

I may draw the mental image in my head later and post it here. D:

Please do :2thumbsup:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Pyraxis on August 03, 2013, 04:25:23 PM
This happens more than you can imagine, Bulling is rabbit on these types of web sites, the parents either think its kids being kids or don't care, when several group up on one in any fashion its called a bulling , and any parent that thinks its "Kids being Kids" should not be aloud to be parents.

Hey you're talking to someone who's been here since early days when just about any argument here devolved into accusations of bullying.

That's why I was surprised to see Rage going at Schleed and I wanted to know what pattern he was looking at, since it didn't seem like it had gone far enough to qualify as a gangup yet, at least not like past gangups. I'm not out to try and stop Rage or you from speaking your minds. (It would be futile anyway.)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 03, 2013, 04:40:09 PM
This happens more than you can imagine, Bulling is rabbit on these types of web sites, the parents either think its kids being kids or don't care, when several group up on one in any fashion its called a bulling , and any parent that thinks its "Kids being Kids" should not be aloud to be parents.

Hey you're talking to someone who's been here since early days when just about any argument here devolved into accusations of bullying.

That's why I was surprised to see Rage going at Schleed and I wanted to know what pattern he was looking at, since it didn't seem like it had gone far enough to qualify as a gangup yet, at least not like past gangups. I'm not out to try and stop Rage or you from speaking your minds. (It would be futile anyway.)

That wasn't a serious post. :P I copied it from Megan Meier ED page.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 03, 2013, 04:41:51 PM
Are you getting a blowjob out of this?  :zoinks:

Yup. ;)

That explains everything.

I may draw the mental image in my head later and post it here. D:

Coooool. I am glad I inspired you as an artist. :P
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: 'Butterflies' on August 03, 2013, 04:45:52 PM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

Actually, you're shit stirring. I always see you joining in on these, trying to turn it into a gangbang. Not this time, faggot. This is none of your business, so fuck off.

I point out bullshit when I see it.

What are you doing?

Standing up to a bully.

Is Rage actually claiming that Schleed is bullying Les? :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 03, 2013, 04:47:18 PM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

Actually, you're shit stirring. I always see you joining in on these, trying to turn it into a gangbang. Not this time, faggot. This is none of your business, so fuck off.

I point out bullshit when I see it.

What are you doing?

Standing up to a bully.

Is Rage actually claiming that Schleed is bullying Les? :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

Tbh, I don't see a difference between schleed and other members who shit stir. Maybe Rage sees something I do not?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Pyraxis on August 03, 2013, 04:52:54 PM
That wasn't a serious post. :P I copied it from Megan Meier ED page.

 :asthing:

Who the hell is Megan Meier?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 03, 2013, 04:55:45 PM
That wasn't a serious post. :P I copied it from Megan Meier ED page.

 :asthing:

Who the hell is Megan Meier?

Was.

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Megan_Meier
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 04:58:37 PM
Why is calling you out bringing up stuff from 2010? That makes no sense. If it were anyone else calling you out for the exact same reasons, I bet you'd not react the same.

No one gives a fuck what was said. The past is the past. Adam wasn't trying to bring what was said to the present. In fact Les, you have without any provocation. You're shit stirring.

Actually, you're shit stirring. I always see you joining in on these, trying to turn it into a gangbang. Not this time, faggot. This is none of your business, so fuck off.

I point out bullshit when I see it.

What are you doing?

Standing up to a bully.

Is Rage actually claiming that Schleed is bullying Les? :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

That and I'm a muhfuggen GAYNGBANGUR BIATCH
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 05:36:19 PM
Are you getting a blowjob out of this?  :zoinks:

Yup. ;)

That explains everything.

I may draw the mental image in my head later and post it here. D:

Please do :2thumbsup:

Here we go...

(http://i.imgur.com/7FOrCjs.png)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 03, 2013, 05:40:36 PM
Is that you and Emma? :zoinks:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 05:41:35 PM
I wish. :zoinks:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 03, 2013, 05:42:17 PM
This song goes perfectly with it:

America fuck yeah-team america (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhnUgAaea4M#)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Al Swearegen on August 03, 2013, 05:43:23 PM
I get the short hairy guy. That has to be you. Rest rest of the allusion is lost to me.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 03, 2013, 05:44:29 PM
He wish he looked that good.  :zoinks:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 04, 2013, 11:36:02 AM
Are you getting a blowjob out of this?  :zoinks:

Yup. ;)

That explains everything.

I may draw the mental image in my head later and post it here. D:

Please do :2thumbsup:

Here we go...

(http://i.imgur.com/7FOrCjs.png)

You really want to get personal huh?  It just so happens my girlfriend has a piece of personal information about you, that could cause you quite a bit of trouble. Knock it off with that stuff dude. If you have an argument with me, keep it to the argument. I'm warning you.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 04, 2013, 11:39:20 AM
This happens more than you can imagine, Bulling is rabbit on these types of web sites, the parents either think its kids being kids or don't care, when several group up on one in any fashion its called a bulling , and any parent that thinks its "Kids being Kids" should not be aloud to be parents.

Hey you're talking to someone who's been here since early days when just about any argument here devolved into accusations of bullying.

That's why I was surprised to see Rage going at Schleed and I wanted to know what pattern he was looking at, since it didn't seem like it had gone far enough to qualify as a gangup yet, at least not like past gangups. I'm not out to try and stop Rage or you from speaking your minds. (It would be futile anyway.)

I saw one brewing. And schleed sure loves those. You know that.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Pyraxis on August 04, 2013, 12:15:59 PM
Gotcha.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Kapkao on August 04, 2013, 12:38:18 PM
(http://emotibot.net/pix/25.jpg)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 06:05:18 PM
You really want to get personal huh?  It just so happens my girlfriend has a piece of personal information about you, that could cause you quite a bit of trouble. Knock it off with that stuff dude. If you have an argument with me, keep it to the argument. I'm warning you.

I see I have hit a nerve.  :laugh:

I wonder what this "personal information" is, but frankly I don't think it'll cause trouble for me at all. Not like I showed my dick or anything. :zoinks:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 06:17:48 PM
You really want to get personal huh?  It just so happens my girlfriend has a piece of personal information about you, that could cause you quite a bit of trouble. Knock it off with that stuff dude. If you have an argument with me, keep it to the argument. I'm warning you.

I see I have hit a nerve.  :laugh:

I wonder what this "personal information" is, but frankly I don't think it'll cause trouble for me at all. Not like I showed my dick or anything. :zoinks:
Not hard to do. His name is Rage after all. You said you hate pig on chat. Pig sure ruffled your feathers. For someone so "apathetic" he sure got to you. The cryptic message on FB you said made it sound like Pig and Emma were having an emotional affair. Pig won't tell me what it is, but I wouldn't be surprised if it had anything to do with your confession in 2012.

 :pwned:

I have it all in my backup files. It is in XML form.  :yarly: Unchanged since last year. So you can't accuse me of doctoring it. :hahaha:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 06:23:33 PM
www.youtube.com/watch?v=98T3PVaRrHU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98T3PVaRrHU#)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 06:26:18 PM
You know, I actually forgot. I remember Emma telling me to PM pig to leave her alone, that's about it. Seems to have worked. :P
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 06:28:40 PM
I recall something of the effect of "they became too close too fast."
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Gopher Gary on August 04, 2013, 06:31:21 PM
He's I2's very own phantom of the opera.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 06:31:37 PM
I was wary of him, true. Who wouldn't be when the person in question is a complete mental fuck up? In the end Emma decided to end it because she too became wary of him, not me.

She left i2 for similar reasons, which is a shame because she got on with quite a number of people on here.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: "couldbecousin" on August 04, 2013, 06:39:37 PM
I was wary of him, true. Who wouldn't be when the person in question is a complete mental fuck up? In the end Emma decided to end it because she too became wary of him, not me.

She left i2 for similar reasons, which is a shame because she got on with quite a number of people on here.

  I was sorry to see her go.  I miss her.  :(
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 06:44:03 PM
She didn't really like forums and wanted to leave this kind of community. I was the same until I came back here due to Shleed's Law. :zoinks:

Never was a huge fan of the aspie community myself. Didn't really "relate" with it. If it weren't for friends I know on here, I doubt I would've even come back in the first place.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 06:50:39 PM
She didn't really like forums and wanted to leave this kind of community. I was the same until I came back here due to Shleed's Law. :zoinks:

Never was a huge fan of the aspie community myself. Didn't really "relate" with it. If it weren't for friends I know on here, I doubt I would've even come back in the first place.

That's right, play it cool. :)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 06:51:32 PM
If you're prodding me over pig, I don't see how that's huge. :zoinks:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Jack on August 04, 2013, 07:03:28 PM


  I was sorry to see her go.  I miss her.  :(

She should come back.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 07:10:07 PM
If you're prodding me over pig, I don't see how that's huge. :zoinks:

Playing dumb I see. You admitted to me last year that could actually cause damage to your relationship with Emma. I suggest you behave yourself. I have the xml documents with everything you told me. Do you really want to play this game with me? I may be soft hearted, but if pushed I can become ruthless. Don't take my kind nature for granted. ;)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Jack on August 04, 2013, 07:14:04 PM
He's I2's very own phantom of the opera.

He must be a smooth talker. He seems to get quite a bit of lady attention. Or maybe it's all the mystery. :laugh:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 07:16:49 PM
Do you honestly expect me to remember details from a year ago? Pig was sorted, our relationship was sorted. Things are fine now.

I'm finding it funny that past drama has to be dug up because of a drawing, really. :laugh:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: 'Butterflies' on August 04, 2013, 07:18:50 PM
He's I2's very own phantom of the opera.

He must be a smooth talker. He seems to get quite a bit of lady attention. Or maybe it's all the mystery. :laugh:

Ive noticed that. I dunno how he manages it. I know I would have nothing to do with him.

I have to admit, he can be kinda funny sometimes, but he's scary :laugh:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 07:21:24 PM
I'm scary? :laugh:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: 'Butterflies' on August 04, 2013, 07:23:49 PM
I'm scary? :laugh:

We're talking about Pig :laugh:

Or at least, Im talking about Pig. I assume Jacks talking about Pig too :laugh:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Jack on August 04, 2013, 07:24:26 PM
I'm scary? :laugh:

We're talking about Pig :laugh:

Or at least, Im talking about Pig. I assume Jacks talking about Pig too :laugh:
Jack is talking about Pig. :laugh:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 07:25:59 PM
Oh, right.

I've no real issue with him anymore. We drew our boundaries ages ago and he kept his word.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 04, 2013, 07:32:15 PM
You really want to get personal huh?  It just so happens my girlfriend has a piece of personal information about you, that could cause you quite a bit of trouble. Knock it off with that stuff dude. If you have an argument with me, keep it to the argument. I'm warning you.

I see I have hit a nerve.  :laugh:

I wonder what this "personal information" is, but frankly I don't think it'll cause trouble for me at all. Not like I showed my dick or anything. :zoinks:

Its something that would upset Emma, bro. About you.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 04, 2013, 07:35:28 PM
If you're prodding me over pig, I don't see how that's huge. :zoinks:

Playing dumb I see. You admitted to me last year that could actually cause damage to your relationship with Emma. I suggest you behave yourself. I have the xml documents with everything you told me. Do you really want to play this game with me? I may be soft hearted, but if pushed I can become ruthless. Don't take my kind nature for granted. ;)

Oh, well. There it is. I'd watch my fucking mouth if I were you, Schleed. She means it.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 07:40:54 PM
Emma never comes onto here, so it's not like she can read any of this to be upset over. :P

I'm failing how to see that taking the piss equals to dragging up stuff from the past, especially if it came from logs that DFG mentioned. Shit happened with Pig and things happened with me and Emma over it, big deal.

Personally, I think I did my job here with that drawing. It has both of you all riled up. :laugh:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 04, 2013, 07:45:11 PM
Emma never comes onto here, so it's not like she can read any of this to be upset over. :P

I'm failing how to see that taking the piss equals to dragging up stuff from the past, especially if it came from logs that DFG mentioned. Shit happened with Pig and things happened with me and Emma over it, big deal.

Personally, I think I did my job here with that drawing. It has both of you all riled up. :laugh:

I tried to help, dude. This has nothing to do with pig, and its quite just. You decided to get cocky and poke fun at my girl, and our relationship. That leaves you open for the consequences of such an act. She has information that has nothing to do with pig, and everything to do with you. And yes, it would upset Emma.

I'd apologize to DFG if I were you, man. You're really asking for trouble.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 07:45:20 PM
Oh, right.

I've no real issue with him anymore. We drew our boundaries ages ago and he kept his word.

You are a really good bullshitter. Better than MLA. If he kept his word, why do you hate him so much?
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 07:47:25 PM
Emma never comes onto here, so it's not like she can read any of this to be upset over. :P

I'm failing how to see that taking the piss equals to dragging up stuff from the past, especially if it came from logs that DFG mentioned. Shit happened with Pig and things happened with me and Emma over it, big deal.

Personally, I think I did my job here with that drawing. It has both of you all riled up. :laugh:

I tried to help, dude. This has nothing to do with pig, and its quite just. You decided to get cocky and poke fun at my girl, and our relationship. That leaves you open for the consequences of such an act. She has information that has nothing to do with pig, and everything to do with you. And yes, it would upset Emma.

I'd apologize to DFG if I were you, man. You're really asking for trouble.

To be frank, the drawing was made to piss you off more than DFG, since you are easily riled up. I've no real issues with her and figured she could take it.

Quote
You are a really good bullshitter. Better than MLA. If he kept his word, why do you hate him so much?
I don't hate him anymore.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 04, 2013, 07:51:55 PM
Emma never comes onto here, so it's not like she can read any of this to be upset over. :P

I'm failing how to see that taking the piss equals to dragging up stuff from the past, especially if it came from logs that DFG mentioned. Shit happened with Pig and things happened with me and Emma over it, big deal.

Personally, I think I did my job here with that drawing. It has both of you all riled up. :laugh:

I tried to help, dude. This has nothing to do with pig, and its quite just. You decided to get cocky and poke fun at my girl, and our relationship. That leaves you open for the consequences of such an act. She has information that has nothing to do with pig, and everything to do with you. And yes, it would upset Emma.

I'd apologize to DFG if I were you, man. You're really asking for trouble.

To be frank, the drawing was made to piss you off more than DFG, since you are easily riled up. I've no real issues with her and figured she could take it.

Quote
You are a really good bullshitter. Better than MLA. If he kept his word, why do you hate him so much?
I don't hate him anymore.

You thought wrong. Yep.

(http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/167/571/Abandon-Thread.gif)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 08:01:44 PM
Thought wrong about what? I got the response I was looking for, even if I wasn't expecting past stuff being brought up.

If anything it proves nothing about me being a "gang-bangin' bully", really. Unless I brought up personal information about you two (which I'm lacking), bringing up personal stuff about me isn't exactly the best way of doing things. In fact, even if I did, I wouldn't stoop that low (at least I wouldn't these days).

Get over yourself, Rage. ;)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 08:05:13 PM
Emma never comes onto here, so it's not like she can read any of this to be upset over. :P

I'm failing how to see that taking the piss equals to dragging up stuff from the past, especially if it came from logs that DFG mentioned. Shit happened with Pig and things happened with me and Emma over it, big deal.

Personally, I think I did my job here with that drawing. It has both of you all riled up. :laugh:

I tried to help, dude. This has nothing to do with pig, and its quite just. You decided to get cocky and poke fun at my girl, and our relationship. That leaves you open for the consequences of such an act. She has information that has nothing to do with pig, and everything to do with you. And yes, it would upset Emma.

I'd apologize to DFG if I were you, man. You're really asking for trouble.

To be frank, the drawing was made to piss you off more than DFG, since you are easily riled up. I've no real issues with her and figured she could take it.

Quote
You are a really good bullshitter. Better than MLA. If he kept his word, why do you hate him so much?
I don't hate him anymore.

You made Ragey look like Goranchev. :D

I am angry with you because you are a liar. You threatened my friend. You said you would dox him. (He gave me permission to disclose this.)

You leave him alone. You have far more to lose than he does. Trolling is also illegal where you live.

Your own hypocrisy is staggering.

Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 08:12:40 PM
I said I was going to disclose information on him? Is that why you had this kind of response? Why does this have to do with you and Rage?

I probably said shit to scare him off, but that was then. I've no "dox" on him. Telling him "Emma doesn't want to talk to you" wasn't going to exactly work on it's own.

Quote
Trolling is also illegal where you live.
Nope, it isn't. You're thinking of the UK.

Quote
You have far more to lose than he does.
If it's that bad, perhaps. But dragging Pig and past stuff into this, which is something I really did not expect, is highly irrelevant to me pissing off Rage with a drawing.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 04, 2013, 08:18:58 PM
Thought wrong about what? I got the response I was looking for, even if I wasn't expecting past stuff being brought up.

If anything it proves nothing about me being a "gang-bangin' bully", really. Unless I brought up personal information about you two (which I'm lacking), bringing up personal stuff about me isn't exactly the best way of doing things. In fact, even if I did, I wouldn't stoop that low (at least I wouldn't these days).

Get over yourself, Rage. ;)

Uh huh. So you were looking for relationship problems with Emma? Because if you keep pressing, that's whats going to happen. I'm not the one you need to be discussing this with, by the way. I'm not the one you pissed off. Dude. I'm serious, let it go.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 08:22:18 PM
I'll let it go if you two stop fussing over a bloody drawing. ::)

Jesus, I wasn't even trolling all that well.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 04, 2013, 08:23:45 PM
I'll let it go if you two stop fussing over a bloody drawing. ::)

Jesus, I wasn't even trolling all that well.

Actually, I don't know if she'll let you go at this point.


Abandoning thread! (for real this time)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 08:24:23 PM
I said I was going to disclose information on him? Is that why you had this kind of response? Why does this have to do with you and Rage?

I probably said shit to scare him off, but that was then. I've no "dox" on him. Telling him "Emma doesn't want to talk to you" wasn't going to exactly work on it's own.

Quote
Trolling is also illegal where you live.
Nope, it isn't. You're thinking of the UK.

Quote
You have far more to lose than he does.
If it's that bad, perhaps. But dragging Pig and past stuff into this, which is something I really did not expect, is highly irrelevant to me pissing off Rage with a drawing.

If Rage doesn't like it, I don't either. He wants you to not do that. You should comply if your don't want it returned to you in kind.  Also, your treatment of pig is unfair. I thought so for the longest time. I never said anything much because it is your opinion. You threatened pig that you would expose his personal data. That is going too far. Way too far. You have your own massive footprint on the internet as well. You are not immune to the reverse happening.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 08:27:54 PM
I said I was going to disclose information on him? Is that why you had this kind of response? Why does this have to do with you and Rage?

I probably said shit to scare him off, but that was then. I've no "dox" on him. Telling him "Emma doesn't want to talk to you" wasn't going to exactly work on it's own.

Quote
Trolling is also illegal where you live.
Nope, it isn't. You're thinking of the UK.

Quote
You have far more to lose than he does.
If it's that bad, perhaps. But dragging Pig and past stuff into this, which is something I really did not expect, is highly irrelevant to me pissing off Rage with a drawing.

If Rage doesn't like it, I don't either. He wants you to not do that. You should comply if your don't want it returned to you in kind.  Also, your treatment of pig is unfair. I thought so for the longest time. I never said anything much because it is your opinion. You threatened pig that you would expose his personal data. That is going too far. Way too far. You have your own massive footprint on the internet as well. You are not immune to the reverse happening.

I do not take kindly to blackmail. I am not going to stop criticising people and taking the piss, if that's what you aim. I'll let this go and that's it.

As for my internet footprint, there's nothing really interesting on me.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: RageBeoulve on August 04, 2013, 08:32:56 PM
Its not blackmail, bud. Cause and consequence is all it is. When you fuck with people, you better be ready for some backlash.

Quote
there's nothing really interesting on me

Yeah ok.

(http://www.reactionface.info/sites/default/files/images/1310571199396.jpg)
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 08:34:57 PM
I said I was going to disclose information on him? Is that why you had this kind of response? Why does this have to do with you and Rage?

I probably said shit to scare him off, but that was then. I've no "dox" on him. Telling him "Emma doesn't want to talk to you" wasn't going to exactly work on it's own.

Quote
Trolling is also illegal where you live.
Nope, it isn't. You're thinking of the UK.

Quote
You have far more to lose than he does.
If it's that bad, perhaps. But dragging Pig and past stuff into this, which is something I really did not expect, is highly irrelevant to me pissing off Rage with a drawing.

If Rage doesn't like it, I don't either. He wants you to not do that. You should comply if your don't want it returned to you in kind.  Also, your treatment of pig is unfair. I thought so for the longest time. I never said anything much because it is your opinion. You threatened pig that you would expose his personal data. That is going too far. Way too far. You have your own massive footprint on the internet as well. You are not immune to the reverse happening.

I do not take kindly to blackmail.
I am not going to stop criticising people and taking the piss, if that's what you aim. I'll let this go and that's it.

As for my internet footprint, there's nothing really interesting on me.

You blackmailed pig.  :CanofWorms:
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 08:41:14 PM
There really isn't anything interesting about me online. Google if you want, at least that stuff's not personal.

I somewhat remember Pea trying the same on me before. Only came up with a profile I made on a support website because I said I had "depression" on it. That was 2007, back before I even got serious in the aspie community. :zoinks:

Quote
You blackmailed pig. 

It was false. Like I said, I have nothing on him and don't really care enough to do so. Besides, that was a year ago. Things I did back then I wouldn't even dare to do these days.

I can apologise to Pig over that, but what is done now is a cuntish way to turn the tides, to be honest. I wouldn't bring up people's personal info these days.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Bastet on August 04, 2013, 08:47:07 PM
Alright. Fine. Truce. I have been sick of some the crap that has gone on here for quite a while.

*claws retract*
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: Beardy McFuckface on August 04, 2013, 08:50:29 PM
Truce it is then.
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: bodie on August 05, 2013, 01:05:32 AM
I was wary of him, true. Who wouldn't be when the person in question is a complete mental fuck up? In the end Emma decided to end it because she too became wary of him, not me.

She left i2 for similar reasons, which is a shame because she got on with quite a number of people on here.

  I was sorry to see her go.  I miss her.  :(
Emma is lovely.  Say hi
Title: Re: FAO Les (continued...)
Post by: 'andersom' on August 06, 2013, 03:14:42 AM
I was wary of him, true. Who wouldn't be when the person in question is a complete mental fuck up? In the end Emma decided to end it because she too became wary of him, not me.

She left i2 for similar reasons, which is a shame because she got on with quite a number of people on here.

  I was sorry to see her go.  I miss her.  :(
Emma is lovely.  Say hi
:agreed:

Say hi from me too, please.